{"_id": {"$oid": "6abd11422c9d37fedb8af8d2"}, "test_id": "T0951", "benchmark": "blacklist_cards", "date": "2026-04-21", "tags": {"document-type": ["index-card"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["de"], "entry-type": ["company"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["lea_kasper", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b", "dataclass": "Card", "temperature": 0.5, "role_description": "You are a Historian", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "You are a meticulous archivist extracting data from an index card image. Analyze the provided image and extract the following information. Return the data ONLY as a valid JSON object.\n\n- \"company\": The primary company name, usually in the top-left. Exclude the location.\n- \"location\": The city or town, often following the company name.\n- \"b_id\": The identifier code, usually in the top-right, starting with \"B.\".\n- \"date\": Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string.\n- \"information\": A list of text blocks from the main body of the card. Each block should be a separate string in the list. Maintain line breaks with \\\\n.\n\nHere is the required JSON format:\n{\n  \"company\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"location\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"b_id\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"date\": \"\",\n  \"information\": [\n    {\"transcription\": \"\"}\n  ]\n}\n\nIf you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string. Do not add any explanatory text outside of the JSON object.", "results": {"text": "{\"company\":{\"transcription\":\"Abegg & Cie.\"},\"location\":{\"transcription\":\"Z\u00fcrich\"},\"b_id\":{\"transcription\":\"B.51.322.GB.266\"},\"date\":\"\",\"information\":[]}", "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b-20260216", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 2576, "output_tokens": 2199, "total_tokens": 4775, "input_cost_usd": 0.00100464, "output_cost_usd": 0.00514566, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.0061503}, "duration": 56.21417021751404, "timestamp": "2026-04-21T16:34:41.936297", "parsed": {"company": {"transcription": "Abegg & Cie."}, "location": {"transcription": "Z\u00fcrich"}, "b_id": {"transcription": "B.51.322.GB.266"}, "date": "", "information": []}, "conversation_id": "4d5e0f68-8584-4888-b376-05c9713decbe", "score": {"fuzzy": 0.8}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1776782026-LGtidnjAmOcAghuZZH9l\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n  \\\"company\\\": {\\n    \\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"location\\\": {\\n    \\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"b_id\\\": {\\n    \\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"date\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n  \\\"information\\\": []\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"parsed\":{\"company\":{\"transcription\":\"Abegg & Cie.\"},\"location\":{\"transcription\":\"Z\u00fcrich\"},\"b_id\":{\"transcription\":\"B.51.322.GB.266\"},\"date\":\"\",\"information\":[]},\"reasoning\":\"The user wants me to extract data from an image of an index card.\\n\\n**1. Analyze the image:**\\n*   **Top Left:** \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" - This looks like a company name.\\n*   **Top Middle/Right:** \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\" - This is a city, so it's the location.\\n*   **Top Right:** \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\" - This matches the \\\"b_id\\\" pattern described (starts with \\\"B.\\\").\\n*   **Body:** The rest of the card is blank lined paper. There is no handwritten text or other printed text in the main body area.\\n*   **Date:** I don't see any specific date stamped on the card.\\n\\n**2. Map to JSON fields:**\\n*   `company`: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"\\n*   `location`: \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"\\n*   `b_id`: \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"\\n*   `date`: \\\"\\\" (empty string)\\n*   `information`: [] (empty list, as the body is blank)\\n\\n**3. Format the output:**\\nConstruct the JSON object according to the specified schema.\\n\\n*   `company`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"}\\n*   `location`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"}\\n*   `b_id`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"}\\n*   `date`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `information`: [] (Wait, the prompt says \\\"A list of text blocks... Each block should be a separate string\\\". If there is no text, an empty list is appropriate, or perhaps a list with an empty string? The prompt says \\\"If you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string.\\\" For `information`, it's a list of objects. If there's no info, an empty list `[]` makes the most sense. Let's look at the example format: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This suggests if there *is* info, it goes there. If there is *no* info, I should probably return an empty list or a list with an empty transcription. Given the card is blank, I will return an empty list to be precise, or perhaps a list with one empty string if strictly following the \\\"block\\\" idea. However, usually, blank cards result in empty lists. Let's look at the instruction: \\\"A list of text blocks from the main body...\\\". Since there are no text blocks, `[]` is the most accurate representation. Wait, looking at the provided JSON format example: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This implies the key exists and is a list. I will provide an empty list `[]` because there is literally no information. Actually, re-reading \\\"If you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string.\\\" This applies to fields with transcription values. `information` is a list of objects. I will return an empty list `[]`.)\\n\\nLet's refine the `information` field. The prompt says: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]` in the example format. This is a bit ambiguous. Does it mean \\\"always have one object\\\"? Or is that just an example of what an object looks like? \\\"A list of text blocks... Each block should be a separate string\\\". If there are no blocks, the list should be empty. I will use an empty list.\\n\\nLet's double check the text.\\n\\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"\\n\\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"\\n\\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"\\n\\nThe text is typewritten.\\n\\nFinal JSON construction:\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"company\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"},\\n  \\\"location\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"},\\n  \\\"b_id\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"},\\n  \\\"date\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n  \\\"information\\\": []\\n}\\n```\\nWait, looking closer at the prompt's example format:\\n```json\\n  \\\"information\\\": [\\n    {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"}\\n  ]\\n```\\nIt shows a list with one object containing an empty string. This might be a template. However, logically, if there is no text, an empty list is better. But to be safe and strictly follow the \\\"If you cannot find a value... leave transcription value as empty string\\\" rule, maybe I should put one empty object? No, \\\"information\\\" is a list of blocks. If there are no blocks, the list is empty. I'll stick with an empty list.\\n\\nActually, let's look at the prompt again. \\\"Return the data ONLY as a valid JSON object.\\\" and \\\"Here is the required JSON format\\\". The format shows `information` as a list of objects. I will provide an empty list `[]` because the body is empty.\\n\\nRe-evaluating the `information` field based on typical behavior for these tasks: usually, if the field is blank, it's an empty string or empty list. I'll provide an empty list.\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" has spaces between letters? \\\"A b e g g\\\". Looking closely at the image... yes, it looks like \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\". The kerning is very wide. \\\"A b e g g\\\". Let me look really closely.\\n\\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" -> Yes, there are significant spaces.\\n\\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\" -> Standard spacing.\\n\\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\" -> Standard spacing.\\n\\nLet's transcribe \\\"Abegg\\\" carefully. It looks like `A b e g g`. It's typewritten with wide spacing. I should probably transcribe it as it appears: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" or \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\". Standard transcription usually normalizes spaces unless it's a specific code. However, looking at the image, the letters are distinct. \\\"A b e g g\\\". I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because that is the company name, and the spacing is likely just the typewriter setting or font. Wait, looking at \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\", the spacing is normal. \\\"A b e g g\\\" has wide spacing. \\\"Cie.\\\" has normal spacing. This suggests the company name might be styled that way or it's just a specific typewriter quirk. I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" to be helpful, or \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" to be literal. Literal is usually safer for OCR tasks. Let's look at the spacing again. A-space-b-space-e-space-g-space-g. It's very distinct. I will transcribe it literally as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" but maybe normalize the spaces? No, let's look at the prompt \\\"meticulous archivist\\\". Meticulous implies accuracy. \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" is what is visually there. But \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" is the semantic content. I'll go with \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it's the standard name format, assuming the wide spacing is a stylistic choice of the letterhead. Actually, looking really close, it looks like `A b e g g`. I'll stick to \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it's the most reasonable interpretation of the entity name. Wait, let me look at the spacing in \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\". Z-\u00fc-r-i-c-h. Normal. \\\"B.51...\\\" Normal. So \\\"A b e g g\\\" is definitely spaced out. I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because usually, extra spaces in headers like this are ignored in data extraction unless it's a code.\\n\\nLet's reconsider. If I type \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\", it captures the essence. If I type \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\", it captures the visual layout. I'll go with \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it is the company name.\\n\\nWait, looking at the very top left, there are some staple holes or marks.\\nThe text is: `A b e g g & Cie.`\\nI will transcribe it as `Abegg & Cie.` removing the extra spaces for clarity, as it is a company name.\\n\\nLet's check the date again. No date.\\n\\nFinal check of fields:\\n- company: Abegg & Cie.\\n- location: Z\u00fcrich\\n- b_id: B.51.322.GB.266\\n- date: \\\"\\\"\\n- information: []\\n\\nOne final check on the `information` field. The prompt says: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This implies a list of objects. If I return `[]`, it's valid JSON. If I return `[{\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"}]`, it implies there is one block that is empty. Since the card is blank, `[]` is semantically correct.\\n\\nLet's refine the company name transcription. \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" -> The spaces are quite deliberate. I will include the spaces to be meticulous. \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" is probably what a human would read, but \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" is what is there. I'll compromise and write \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because \\\"A b e g g\\\" looks like a specific typesetting for the header. Actually, looking at crop 1, it is clearly `A b e g g`. I will transcribe it as `Abegg & Cie.` because standardizing spaces in names is common practice unless it's a code.\\n\\nLet's look at the `b_id`. `B.51.322.GB.266`.\\nLet's look at `location`. `Z\u00fcrich`.\\n\\nOkay, ready to generate JSON.\\n\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"The user wants me to extract data from an image of an index card.\\n\\n**1. Analyze the image:**\\n*   **Top Left:** \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" - This looks like a company name.\\n*   **Top Middle/Right:** \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\" - This is a city, so it's the location.\\n*   **Top Right:** \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\" - This matches the \\\"b_id\\\" pattern described (starts with \\\"B.\\\").\\n*   **Body:** The rest of the card is blank lined paper. There is no handwritten text or other printed text in the main body area.\\n*   **Date:** I don't see any specific date stamped on the card.\\n\\n**2. Map to JSON fields:**\\n*   `company`: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"\\n*   `location`: \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"\\n*   `b_id`: \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"\\n*   `date`: \\\"\\\" (empty string)\\n*   `information`: [] (empty list, as the body is blank)\\n\\n**3. Format the output:**\\nConstruct the JSON object according to the specified schema.\\n\\n*   `company`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"}\\n*   `location`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"}\\n*   `b_id`: {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"}\\n*   `date`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `information`: [] (Wait, the prompt says \\\"A list of text blocks... Each block should be a separate string\\\". If there is no text, an empty list is appropriate, or perhaps a list with an empty string? The prompt says \\\"If you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string.\\\" For `information`, it's a list of objects. If there's no info, an empty list `[]` makes the most sense. Let's look at the example format: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This suggests if there *is* info, it goes there. If there is *no* info, I should probably return an empty list or a list with an empty transcription. Given the card is blank, I will return an empty list to be precise, or perhaps a list with one empty string if strictly following the \\\"block\\\" idea. However, usually, blank cards result in empty lists. Let's look at the instruction: \\\"A list of text blocks from the main body...\\\". Since there are no text blocks, `[]` is the most accurate representation. Wait, looking at the provided JSON format example: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This implies the key exists and is a list. I will provide an empty list `[]` because there is literally no information. Actually, re-reading \\\"If you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string.\\\" This applies to fields with transcription values. `information` is a list of objects. I will return an empty list `[]`.)\\n\\nLet's refine the `information` field. The prompt says: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]` in the example format. This is a bit ambiguous. Does it mean \\\"always have one object\\\"? Or is that just an example of what an object looks like? \\\"A list of text blocks... Each block should be a separate string\\\". If there are no blocks, the list should be empty. I will use an empty list.\\n\\nLet's double check the text.\\n\\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"\\n\\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"\\n\\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"\\n\\nThe text is typewritten.\\n\\nFinal JSON construction:\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"company\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\"},\\n  \\\"location\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\"},\\n  \\\"b_id\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\"},\\n  \\\"date\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n  \\\"information\\\": []\\n}\\n```\\nWait, looking closer at the prompt's example format:\\n```json\\n  \\\"information\\\": [\\n    {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"}\\n  ]\\n```\\nIt shows a list with one object containing an empty string. This might be a template. However, logically, if there is no text, an empty list is better. But to be safe and strictly follow the \\\"If you cannot find a value... leave transcription value as empty string\\\" rule, maybe I should put one empty object? No, \\\"information\\\" is a list of blocks. If there are no blocks, the list is empty. I'll stick with an empty list.\\n\\nActually, let's look at the prompt again. \\\"Return the data ONLY as a valid JSON object.\\\" and \\\"Here is the required JSON format\\\". The format shows `information` as a list of objects. I will provide an empty list `[]` because the body is empty.\\n\\nRe-evaluating the `information` field based on typical behavior for these tasks: usually, if the field is blank, it's an empty string or empty list. I'll provide an empty list.\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" has spaces between letters? \\\"A b e g g\\\". Looking closely at the image... yes, it looks like \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\". The kerning is very wide. \\\"A b e g g\\\". Let me look really closely.\\n\\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" -> Yes, there are significant spaces.\\n\\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\" -> Standard spacing.\\n\\\"B.51.322.GB.266\\\" -> Standard spacing.\\n\\nLet's transcribe \\\"Abegg\\\" carefully. It looks like `A b e g g`. It's typewritten with wide spacing. I should probably transcribe it as it appears: \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" or \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\". Standard transcription usually normalizes spaces unless it's a specific code. However, looking at the image, the letters are distinct. \\\"A b e g g\\\". I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because that is the company name, and the spacing is likely just the typewriter setting or font. Wait, looking at \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\", the spacing is normal. \\\"A b e g g\\\" has wide spacing. \\\"Cie.\\\" has normal spacing. This suggests the company name might be styled that way or it's just a specific typewriter quirk. I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" to be helpful, or \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" to be literal. Literal is usually safer for OCR tasks. Let's look at the spacing again. A-space-b-space-e-space-g-space-g. It's very distinct. I will transcribe it literally as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" but maybe normalize the spaces? No, let's look at the prompt \\\"meticulous archivist\\\". Meticulous implies accuracy. \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" is what is visually there. But \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" is the semantic content. I'll go with \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it's the standard name format, assuming the wide spacing is a stylistic choice of the letterhead. Actually, looking really close, it looks like `A b e g g`. I'll stick to \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it's the most reasonable interpretation of the entity name. Wait, let me look at the spacing in \\\"Z\u00fcrich\\\". Z-\u00fc-r-i-c-h. Normal. \\\"B.51...\\\" Normal. So \\\"A b e g g\\\" is definitely spaced out. I will transcribe it as \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because usually, extra spaces in headers like this are ignored in data extraction unless it's a code.\\n\\nLet's reconsider. If I type \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\", it captures the essence. If I type \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\", it captures the visual layout. I'll go with \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" as it is the company name.\\n\\nWait, looking at the very top left, there are some staple holes or marks.\\nThe text is: `A b e g g & Cie.`\\nI will transcribe it as `Abegg & Cie.` removing the extra spaces for clarity, as it is a company name.\\n\\nLet's check the date again. No date.\\n\\nFinal check of fields:\\n- company: Abegg & Cie.\\n- location: Z\u00fcrich\\n- b_id: B.51.322.GB.266\\n- date: \\\"\\\"\\n- information: []\\n\\nOne final check on the `information` field. The prompt says: `\\\"information\\\": [ {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"} ]`. This implies a list of objects. If I return `[]`, it's valid JSON. If I return `[{\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"\\\"}]`, it implies there is one block that is empty. Since the card is blank, `[]` is semantically correct.\\n\\nLet's refine the company name transcription. \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" -> The spaces are quite deliberate. I will include the spaces to be meticulous. \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" is probably what a human would read, but \\\"A b e g g & Cie.\\\" is what is there. I'll compromise and write \\\"Abegg & Cie.\\\" because \\\"A b e g g\\\" looks like a specific typesetting for the header. Actually, looking at crop 1, it is clearly `A b e g g`. I will transcribe it as `Abegg & Cie.` because standardizing spaces in names is common practice unless it's a code.\\n\\nLet's look at the `b_id`. `B.51.322.GB.266`.\\nLet's look at `location`. `Z\u00fcrich`.\\n\\nOkay, ready to generate JSON.\\n\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1776782026,\"model\":\"qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b-20260216\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":null,\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":2199,\"prompt_tokens\":2576,\"total_tokens\":4775,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":1974,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":0,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.009462,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.009462,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.0015456,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.0079164}},\"provider\":\"Parasail\"}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.8346888937084868, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 89887, "total_output_tokens": 59145, "total_tokens": 149032, "input_cost_usd": 0.035055930000000006, "output_cost_usd": 0.13839929999999995, "total_cost_usd": 0.17345522999999996}}, "pricing": {"bucket_date": "2026-04-21", "age_days": 0, "input_price_per_million": 0.39, "output_price_per_million": 2.34}, "timing": {"total_response_s": 2182.09, "mean_response_s": 66.12, "slowest_response_s": 315.54, "inputs_timed": 33, "inputs_stored": 33, "span_s": 316.32}, "normalized_score": 83.46888937084867}