{"_id": {"$oid": "6a26c67c3572c06bc1455d8a"}, "test_id": "T0988", "benchmark": "library_cards", "date": "2026-04-21", "tags": {"document-type": ["index-card"], "writing": ["typed", "printed", "handwritten"], "century": [20, 19], "language": ["de", "fr", "en", "la", "el", "fi", "sv", "pl"], "layout": ["index"], "entry-type": ["bibliographic"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["gabriel_muller", "maximilian_hindermann"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-9b", "dataclass": "Document", "temperature": 0.0, "role_description": "You are a historian with keyword knowledge", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "Extract the bibliographic information about a historical dissertation from this index card and return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"type\": {\n    \"type\": \"Dissertation or thesis\" OR \"Reference\"\n  },\n  \"author\": {\n    \"last_name\": \"string\",\n    \"first_name\": \"string\"\n  },\n  \"publication\": {\n    \"title\": \"string\",\n    \"year\": integer,\n    \"place\": \"string or empty string\",\n    \"pages\": \"string or empty string\",\n    \"publisher\": \"string or empty string\",\n    \"format\": \"string or empty string\"\n  },\n  \"library_reference\": {\n    \"shelfmark\": \"string or empty string\",\n    \"subjects\": \"string or empty string\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nEXTRACTION RULES:\n1. **Card Type**: If a card contains the note \"s.\" on a separate line, it is a \"Reference\". Otherwise, it is a \"Dissertation or thesis\".\n\n2. **Author**: Extract last_name and first_name. If only one name is given, put it in last_name and leave first_name empty.\n\n3. **Publication**:\n   - title: The main title of the work\n   - year: Publication year as integer\n   - place: Publication place\n   - pages: Page count (remove \" S.\" suffix if present)\n   - publisher: Publishing house/institution\n   - format: Usually \"8\u00b0\", \"8'\", or \"4\u00b0\" - single value only\n\n4. **Library Reference**:\n   - shelfmark: Often begins with \"Diss.\" or \"AT\", may be marked with \"Standort:\"\n   - subjects: Subject classifications or keywords\n\n5. **Missing Information**: Use empty string \"\" for missing text fields, omit year fields entirely if not present.\n\n6. **Ignore**: Disregard any information that doesn't fit into these categories.\n\nReturn ONLY the JSON object, no additional text or explanation.", "results": {"text": "{\n  \"type\": {\n    \"type\": \"Dissertation or thesis\"\n  },\n  \"author\": {\n    \"last_name\": \"Vasmer\",\n    \"first_name\": \"Bernhard\"\n  },\n  \"publication\": {\n    \"title\": \"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\",\n    \"year\": 1859,\n    \"place\": \"Gryphiae\",\n    \"pages\": \"28\",\n    \"publisher\": \"\",\n    \"format\": \"\"\n  },\n  \"library_reference\": {\n    \"shelfmark\": \"\",\n    \"subjects\": \"\"\n  }\n}", "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-9b-20260310", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1804, "output_tokens": 4419, "total_tokens": 6223, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.00084325, "input_cost_usd": 0.00018040000000000002, "output_cost_usd": 0.00066285}, "duration": 3129.6575739383698, "timestamp": "2026-04-21T20:05:20.927841", "parsed": {"type": {"type": "Dissertation or thesis"}, "author": {"last_name": "Vasmer", "first_name": "Bernhard"}, "publication": {"title": "De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.", "year": 1859, "place": "Gryphiae", "pages": "28", "publisher": "", "format": ""}, "library_reference": {"shelfmark": "", "subjects": ""}}, "conversation_id": "b068d87f-463d-4883-8834-ba11a6950983", "score": {"f1_score": 1.0, "precision": 1.0, "recall": 1.0, "true_positives": 7, "false_positives": 0, "false_negatives": 0, "field_scores": {"publication.year": {"response": 1859, "ground_truth": 1859, "score": 1.0}, "publication.publisher": {"response": null, "ground_truth": null, "score": 1.0}, "library_reference.shelfmark": {"response": null, "ground_truth": null, "score": 1.0}, "publication.place": {"response": "Gryphiae", "ground_truth": "Gryphiae", "score": 1.0}, "library_reference.subjects": {"response": null, "ground_truth": null, "score": 1.0}, "publication.pages": {"response": "28", "ground_truth": "28", "score": 1.0}, "author.last_name": {"response": "Vasmer", "ground_truth": "Vasmer", "score": 1.0}, "publication.format": {"response": null, "ground_truth": null, "score": 1.0}, "type.type": {"response": "Dissertation or thesis", "ground_truth": "Dissertation or thesis", "score": 1.0}, "author.first_name": {"response": "Bernhard", "ground_truth": "Bernhard", "score": 1.0}, "publication.title": {"response": "De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.", "ground_truth": "De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti", "score": 0.9965156794425087}}, "total_fields": 11}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1776794657-NmLNs03WdOsrN0wEjMic\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n  \\\"type\\\": {\\n    \\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"author\\\": {\\n    \\\"last_name\\\": \\\"Vasmer\\\",\\n    \\\"first_name\\\": \\\"Bernhard\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"publication\\\": {\\n    \\\"title\\\": \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\",\\n    \\\"year\\\": 1859,\\n    \\\"place\\\": \\\"Gryphiae\\\",\\n    \\\"pages\\\": \\\"28\\\",\\n    \\\"publisher\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n    \\\"format\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"library_reference\\\": {\\n    \\\"shelfmark\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n    \\\"subjects\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n  }\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"reasoning\":\"The user wants me to extract bibliographic information from a handwritten index card image and return it as a structured JSON object.\\n\\n**1. Analyze the Image:**\\n*   **Top Line:** \\\"Vasmer, Bernhard\\\" - This is clearly the author's name. Last name: Vasmer, First name: Bernhard.\\n*   **Number:** \\\"8.\\\" - This is likely a catalog number, not part of the title.\\n*   **Title:** \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\" - This is the Latin title of the dissertation.\\n*   **Publication Info:** \\\"Gryphiae 1859. 28 S.\\\" - \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the place (Greifswald in Latin), \\\"1859\\\" is the year, \\\"28 S.\\\" means 28 pages (S. for Seiten/Seiten).\\n*   **Bottom Line:** \\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859.\\\" - This confirms the place (Greifswald), the degree (D. med. = Doctor of Medicine), and the year (1859).\\n*   **Card Type:** There is no \\\"s.\\\" on a separate line indicating a reference. It looks like a standard dissertation card. The prompt says: \\\"If a card contains the note 's.' on a separate line, it is a 'Reference'. Otherwise, it is a 'Dissertation or thesis'.\\\" I don't see a standalone \\\"s.\\\" indicating a reference. The \\\"28 S.\\\" is part of the page count. So, type is \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\".\\n\\n**2. Map to JSON Schema:**\\n\\n*   **type**: \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"\\n*   **author**:\\n    *   last_name: \\\"Vasmer\\\"\\n    *   first_name: \\\"Bernhard\\\"\\n*   **publication**:\\n    *   title: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   year: 1859\\n    *   place: \\\"Gryphiae\\\" (or \\\"Greifswald\\\" - the card says both, usually the Latin one is the formal publication place, but \\\"Greifswald\\\" is explicitly written at the bottom. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it's in the main block, or \\\"Greifswald\\\" as it's the modern name. The prompt asks for \\\"place\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the Latin form used in the citation line. \\\"Greifswald\\\" is written below. I'll stick with \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it's part of the main citation line, or perhaps combine. Let's look at the instruction: \\\"place: Publication place\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the standard bibliographic place. \\\"Greifswald\\\" is the modern equivalent. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it appears in the main line with the year and pages.)\\n    *   pages: \\\"28\\\" (remove \\\"S.\\\" suffix)\\n    *   publisher: \\\"\\\" (Not explicitly stated, though \\\"D. med.\\\" implies a university press, but no specific publisher name like \\\"Hahn\\\" is visible).\\n    *   format: \\\"\\\" (No \\\"8\u00b0\\\" or similar visible).\\n*   **library_reference**:\\n    *   shelfmark: \\\"\\\" (No \\\"Diss.\\\" or \\\"AT\\\" prefix visible in the standard shelfmark format, though \\\"8.\\\" is a catalog number, it's not a shelfmark like \\\"Diss. 123\\\").\\n    *   subjects: \\\"\\\" (No subject keywords visible).\\n\\n**3. Refine Extraction:**\\n*   **Title:** \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n*   **Year:** 1859\\n*   **Place:** \\\"Gryphiae\\\" (The bottom line says \\\"Greifswald\\\", but the main line says \\\"Gryphiae\\\". I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it is the formal place of publication in the citation).\\n*   **Pages:** \\\"28\\\"\\n*   **Author:** Vasmer, Bernhard.\\n\\n**4. Check Constraints:**\\n*   Return ONLY the JSON object.\\n*   Match the exact schema provided in the prompt description (which includes `$defs`). Wait, the prompt says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a simplified schema. However, the system prompt at the end shows a complex schema with `$defs`. I need to follow the system prompt's schema structure for the output, but the user instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object...\\\". The system prompt defines the schema I must adhere to.\\n*   Wait, looking closely at the user prompt's requested format vs the system prompt's schema.\\n    *   User prompt format: `{\\\"type\\\": {...}, \\\"author\\\": {...}, \\\"publication\\\": {...}, \\\"library_reference\\\": {...}}`\\n    *   System prompt schema: `{\\\"$defs\\\": {...}, \\\"description\\\": ...}`. This is a Pydantic model definition.\\n    *   Usually, when the system prompt provides a schema definition like this, it expects the output to conform to that structure. However, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a flat JSON structure.\\n    *   Actually, looking at the \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" instruction at the very end, it refers to the schema defined in the system prompt (the `$defs` one).\\n    *   BUT, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a specific JSON structure.\\n    *   Let's look at the \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" block. It defines a `Document` type with `WorkType`, `Author`, `Publication`, `LibraryReference`.\\n    *   The user instruction shows a slightly different structure: `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"type\\\": ...}, \\\"author\\\": {\\\"last_name\\\": ..., \\\"first_name\\\": ...}, ...}`.\\n    *   The system prompt's schema for `WorkType` has `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"enum\\\": [\\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\", \\\"Reference\\\"], ...}}`.\\n    *   The user instruction's `type` field is `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\" OR \\\"Reference\\\"}`.\\n    *   I need to align with the system prompt's schema definition because that is the \\\"exact schema\\\" I must match according to the final instruction.\\n    *   Wait, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a specific JSON block. Then the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" and shows a Pydantic model.\\n    *   Usually, the system prompt's schema is the ground truth for the output structure.\\n    *   Let's check the fields in the system prompt schema:\\n        *   `type`: `WorkType` (which has `type` field).\\n        *   `author`: `Author` (which has `last_name`, `first_name`).\\n        *   `publication`: `Publication` (which has `title`, `year`, `place`, `pages`, `publisher`, `format`, `editor`).\\n        *   `library_reference`: `LibraryReference` (which has `shelfmark`, `subjects`).\\n    *   This matches the user's requested structure perfectly, just nested differently in the definition.\\n    *   I will construct the JSON based on the extracted data.\\n\\n**5. Final Data Construction:**\\n*   `type`: `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"}`\\n*   `author`: `{\\\"last_name\\\": \\\"Vasmer\\\", \\\"first_name\\\": \\\"Bernhard\\\"}`\\n*   `publication`:\\n    *   `title`: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   `year`: 1859\\n    *   `place`: \\\"Gryphiae\\\"\\n    *   `pages`: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   `publisher`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `format`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `library_reference`:\\n    *   `shelfmark`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `subjects`: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n**6. Formatting:**\\n*   Ensure valid JSON.\\n*   Ensure no markdown code blocks if the instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object\\\". Wait, the instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object, no additional text or explanation.\\\" but often markdown blocks are acceptable for JSON. However, strict adherence suggests raw JSON. I will output raw JSON.\\n*   Wait, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\n*   I will output the JSON directly.\\n\\n**Correction on Place:** The card says \\\"Gryphiae 1859\\\" and \\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the Latin name for Greifswald. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it is the formal publication place listed in the main citation line.\\n\\n**Correction on Pages:** \\\"28 S.\\\" -> \\\"28\\\".\\n\\n**Correction on Type:** No \\\"s.\\\" on a separate line. It is a dissertation.\\n\\n**Double Check Schema:**\\nThe system prompt defines `Publication` with `year` as `string` in the schema definition (`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`). But the user instruction says `year: integer`.\\nThe system prompt schema is: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThe user instruction says: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nThis is a conflict. The system prompt's schema definition usually overrides for the \\\"exact schema\\\" requirement. However, the user instruction explicitly says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows `year: integer`.\\nLet's look at the system prompt's `Publication` definition again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nWait, looking at the user instruction's format: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nLooking at the system prompt's schema: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nI should probably follow the user instruction's format for the content, but the system prompt's schema for the structure.\\nActually, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\". This usually implies the structure defined in the `$defs`.\\nHowever, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will prioritize the user instruction's format for the fields (integer for year) if possible, but the system prompt schema says string.\\nLet's look at the system prompt's `Publication` definition again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string for year to be safe with the schema validation, or integer if the user instruction is paramount.\\nActually, looking at the user instruction: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nLooking at the system prompt: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThis is a contradiction. I will use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction explicitly defines the format they want to see in the output example. The system prompt schema might be a generic template.\\nWait, I need to check if I can output `1859` as an integer. JSON supports integers.\\nLet's check the system prompt schema again. It says `\\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"`.\\nIf I output an integer, it might fail the schema validation if the system is strict.\\nHowever, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will follow the user instruction's format for the values (integer for year) because that is the specific task instruction. The system prompt schema is likely a template for the *structure* of the response (keys), but the user instruction refines the types.\\nActually, looking at the system prompt's `Publication` definition: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nI will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to be safe with the schema provided in the system prompt, as \\\"matching this exact schema\\\" is a strong constraint.\\nWait, the user instruction says `year: integer`.\\nI'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to ensure I match the system prompt's schema exactly, as that is the \\\"exact schema\\\" I must match.\\nWait, no. The user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will use `1859` as an integer because that is what the user asked for in the \\\"exact format\\\" block. The system prompt schema is likely just defining the keys and types for the *model*, but the user instruction overrides the specific type for the output.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction is the specific task.\\nWait, I need to be careful. The system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nIf I use an integer, and the schema says string, it's invalid.\\nI will use \\\"1859\\\" (string) to be safe.\\nActually, looking at the user instruction again: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nI will use `1859`.\\nLet's look at the system prompt schema again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThis is a conflict. I will follow the user instruction's explicit format for the output, as that is the task. The system prompt schema is likely a generic wrapper.\\nWait, I'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to ensure I match the schema.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction is the primary directive for the output format.\\nLet's compromise. I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction explicitly says `year: integer`. The system prompt schema might be outdated or generic.\\nWait, I'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use \\\"1859\\\" (string) to be safe.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer).\\nLet's look at the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use \\\"1859\\\" (string).\\nWait, I'll check the user instruction again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nOkay, I will use `1859` (integer).\\nI will follow the user instruction.\\n\\n**Final check on fields:**\\n*   `type`: `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"}`\\n*   `author`: `{\\\"last_name\\\": \\\"Vasmer\\\", \\\"first_name\\\": \\\"Bernhard\\\"}`\\n*   `publication`:\\n    *   `title`: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   `year`: 1859\\n    *   `place`: \\\"Gryphiae\\\"\\n    *   `pages`: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   `publisher`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `format`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `library_reference`:\\n    *   `shelfmark`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `subjects`: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nOne detail: The system prompt schema for `Publication` has `editor` as well. The user instruction format does not. I will include `editor` as empty string to match the system prompt schema, as \\\"matching this exact schema\\\" is the final instruction.\\nWait, the user instruction format does not have `editor`.\\nThe system prompt schema has `editor`.\\nI will include `editor` as empty string to match the system prompt schema.\\nWait, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nThe system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nI will follow the system prompt schema for the keys, as it is more detailed.\\nSo I will add `editor`: \\\"\\\".\\n\\nWait, the user instruction format for `publication` is:\\n```json\\n\\\"publication\\\": {\\n  \\\"title\\\": \\\"string\\\",\\n  \\\"year\\\": integer,\\n  \\\"place\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"pages\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"publisher\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"format\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\"\\n}\\n```\\nThe system prompt schema for `Publication` is:\\n```json\\n\\\"Publication\\\": {\\n  \\\"properties\\\": {\\n    \\\"title\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"year\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"place\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"pages\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"publisher\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"format\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"editor\\\": ...\\n  },\\n  ...\\n}\\n```\\nI will follow the user instruction's format for the keys, as that is the specific task instruction. The system prompt schema is likely a generic definition.\\nWait, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nThis is a strong constraint. I will include `editor` if it's in the schema.\\nActually, I'll check the user instruction again. It says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will follow the user instruction's format exactly.\\nSo no `editor`.\\nAnd `year` as integer.\\n\\nWait, I need to check the `type` field.\\nUser instruction: `\\\"type\\\": { \\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\" OR \\\"Reference\\\" }`.\\nSystem prompt schema: `\\\"type\\\": {\\\"$ref\\\": \\\"#/$defs/WorkType\\\"}` where `WorkType` has `type` enum.\\nSo the structure is `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"type\\\": \\\"...\\\"}}`.\\nI will follow the user instruction's structure.\\n\\nOkay, I'm ready.\\n\\nOne last check on the image text.\\n\\\"Vasmer, Bernhard\\\"\\n\\\"8.\\\"\\n\\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n\\\"Gryphiae 1859. 28 S.\\\"\\n\\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859.\\\"\\n\\nAuthor: Vasmer, Bernhard.\\nTitle: De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\nYear: 1859.\\nPlace: Gryphiae.\\nPages: 28.\\nType: Dissertation or thesis.\\n\\nI will construct the JSON now.\\n\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"The user wants me to extract bibliographic information from a handwritten index card image and return it as a structured JSON object.\\n\\n**1. Analyze the Image:**\\n*   **Top Line:** \\\"Vasmer, Bernhard\\\" - This is clearly the author's name. Last name: Vasmer, First name: Bernhard.\\n*   **Number:** \\\"8.\\\" - This is likely a catalog number, not part of the title.\\n*   **Title:** \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\" - This is the Latin title of the dissertation.\\n*   **Publication Info:** \\\"Gryphiae 1859. 28 S.\\\" - \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the place (Greifswald in Latin), \\\"1859\\\" is the year, \\\"28 S.\\\" means 28 pages (S. for Seiten/Seiten).\\n*   **Bottom Line:** \\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859.\\\" - This confirms the place (Greifswald), the degree (D. med. = Doctor of Medicine), and the year (1859).\\n*   **Card Type:** There is no \\\"s.\\\" on a separate line indicating a reference. It looks like a standard dissertation card. The prompt says: \\\"If a card contains the note 's.' on a separate line, it is a 'Reference'. Otherwise, it is a 'Dissertation or thesis'.\\\" I don't see a standalone \\\"s.\\\" indicating a reference. The \\\"28 S.\\\" is part of the page count. So, type is \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\".\\n\\n**2. Map to JSON Schema:**\\n\\n*   **type**: \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"\\n*   **author**:\\n    *   last_name: \\\"Vasmer\\\"\\n    *   first_name: \\\"Bernhard\\\"\\n*   **publication**:\\n    *   title: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   year: 1859\\n    *   place: \\\"Gryphiae\\\" (or \\\"Greifswald\\\" - the card says both, usually the Latin one is the formal publication place, but \\\"Greifswald\\\" is explicitly written at the bottom. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it's in the main block, or \\\"Greifswald\\\" as it's the modern name. The prompt asks for \\\"place\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the Latin form used in the citation line. \\\"Greifswald\\\" is written below. I'll stick with \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it's part of the main citation line, or perhaps combine. Let's look at the instruction: \\\"place: Publication place\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the standard bibliographic place. \\\"Greifswald\\\" is the modern equivalent. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it appears in the main line with the year and pages.)\\n    *   pages: \\\"28\\\" (remove \\\"S.\\\" suffix)\\n    *   publisher: \\\"\\\" (Not explicitly stated, though \\\"D. med.\\\" implies a university press, but no specific publisher name like \\\"Hahn\\\" is visible).\\n    *   format: \\\"\\\" (No \\\"8\u00b0\\\" or similar visible).\\n*   **library_reference**:\\n    *   shelfmark: \\\"\\\" (No \\\"Diss.\\\" or \\\"AT\\\" prefix visible in the standard shelfmark format, though \\\"8.\\\" is a catalog number, it's not a shelfmark like \\\"Diss. 123\\\").\\n    *   subjects: \\\"\\\" (No subject keywords visible).\\n\\n**3. Refine Extraction:**\\n*   **Title:** \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n*   **Year:** 1859\\n*   **Place:** \\\"Gryphiae\\\" (The bottom line says \\\"Greifswald\\\", but the main line says \\\"Gryphiae\\\". I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it is the formal place of publication in the citation).\\n*   **Pages:** \\\"28\\\"\\n*   **Author:** Vasmer, Bernhard.\\n\\n**4. Check Constraints:**\\n*   Return ONLY the JSON object.\\n*   Match the exact schema provided in the prompt description (which includes `$defs`). Wait, the prompt says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a simplified schema. However, the system prompt at the end shows a complex schema with `$defs`. I need to follow the system prompt's schema structure for the output, but the user instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object...\\\". The system prompt defines the schema I must adhere to.\\n*   Wait, looking closely at the user prompt's requested format vs the system prompt's schema.\\n    *   User prompt format: `{\\\"type\\\": {...}, \\\"author\\\": {...}, \\\"publication\\\": {...}, \\\"library_reference\\\": {...}}`\\n    *   System prompt schema: `{\\\"$defs\\\": {...}, \\\"description\\\": ...}`. This is a Pydantic model definition.\\n    *   Usually, when the system prompt provides a schema definition like this, it expects the output to conform to that structure. However, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a flat JSON structure.\\n    *   Actually, looking at the \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" instruction at the very end, it refers to the schema defined in the system prompt (the `$defs` one).\\n    *   BUT, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a specific JSON structure.\\n    *   Let's look at the \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" block. It defines a `Document` type with `WorkType`, `Author`, `Publication`, `LibraryReference`.\\n    *   The user instruction shows a slightly different structure: `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"type\\\": ...}, \\\"author\\\": {\\\"last_name\\\": ..., \\\"first_name\\\": ...}, ...}`.\\n    *   The system prompt's schema for `WorkType` has `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"enum\\\": [\\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\", \\\"Reference\\\"], ...}}`.\\n    *   The user instruction's `type` field is `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\" OR \\\"Reference\\\"}`.\\n    *   I need to align with the system prompt's schema definition because that is the \\\"exact schema\\\" I must match according to the final instruction.\\n    *   Wait, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows a specific JSON block. Then the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\" and shows a Pydantic model.\\n    *   Usually, the system prompt's schema is the ground truth for the output structure.\\n    *   Let's check the fields in the system prompt schema:\\n        *   `type`: `WorkType` (which has `type` field).\\n        *   `author`: `Author` (which has `last_name`, `first_name`).\\n        *   `publication`: `Publication` (which has `title`, `year`, `place`, `pages`, `publisher`, `format`, `editor`).\\n        *   `library_reference`: `LibraryReference` (which has `shelfmark`, `subjects`).\\n    *   This matches the user's requested structure perfectly, just nested differently in the definition.\\n    *   I will construct the JSON based on the extracted data.\\n\\n**5. Final Data Construction:**\\n*   `type`: `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"}`\\n*   `author`: `{\\\"last_name\\\": \\\"Vasmer\\\", \\\"first_name\\\": \\\"Bernhard\\\"}`\\n*   `publication`:\\n    *   `title`: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   `year`: 1859\\n    *   `place`: \\\"Gryphiae\\\"\\n    *   `pages`: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   `publisher`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `format`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `library_reference`:\\n    *   `shelfmark`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `subjects`: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n**6. Formatting:**\\n*   Ensure valid JSON.\\n*   Ensure no markdown code blocks if the instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object\\\". Wait, the instruction says \\\"Return ONLY the JSON object, no additional text or explanation.\\\" but often markdown blocks are acceptable for JSON. However, strict adherence suggests raw JSON. I will output raw JSON.\\n*   Wait, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\n*   I will output the JSON directly.\\n\\n**Correction on Place:** The card says \\\"Gryphiae 1859\\\" and \\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859\\\". \\\"Gryphiae\\\" is the Latin name for Greifswald. I will use \\\"Gryphiae\\\" as it is the formal publication place listed in the main citation line.\\n\\n**Correction on Pages:** \\\"28 S.\\\" -> \\\"28\\\".\\n\\n**Correction on Type:** No \\\"s.\\\" on a separate line. It is a dissertation.\\n\\n**Double Check Schema:**\\nThe system prompt defines `Publication` with `year` as `string` in the schema definition (`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`). But the user instruction says `year: integer`.\\nThe system prompt schema is: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThe user instruction says: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nThis is a conflict. The system prompt's schema definition usually overrides for the \\\"exact schema\\\" requirement. However, the user instruction explicitly says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\" and shows `year: integer`.\\nLet's look at the system prompt's `Publication` definition again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nWait, looking at the user instruction's format: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nLooking at the system prompt's schema: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nI should probably follow the user instruction's format for the content, but the system prompt's schema for the structure.\\nActually, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\". This usually implies the structure defined in the `$defs`.\\nHowever, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will prioritize the user instruction's format for the fields (integer for year) if possible, but the system prompt schema says string.\\nLet's look at the system prompt's `Publication` definition again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string for year to be safe with the schema validation, or integer if the user instruction is paramount.\\nActually, looking at the user instruction: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nLooking at the system prompt: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThis is a contradiction. I will use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction explicitly defines the format they want to see in the output example. The system prompt schema might be a generic template.\\nWait, I need to check if I can output `1859` as an integer. JSON supports integers.\\nLet's check the system prompt schema again. It says `\\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"`.\\nIf I output an integer, it might fail the schema validation if the system is strict.\\nHowever, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will follow the user instruction's format for the values (integer for year) because that is the specific task instruction. The system prompt schema is likely a template for the *structure* of the response (keys), but the user instruction refines the types.\\nActually, looking at the system prompt's `Publication` definition: `\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nI will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to be safe with the schema provided in the system prompt, as \\\"matching this exact schema\\\" is a strong constraint.\\nWait, the user instruction says `year: integer`.\\nI'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to ensure I match the system prompt's schema exactly, as that is the \\\"exact schema\\\" I must match.\\nWait, no. The user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will use `1859` as an integer because that is what the user asked for in the \\\"exact format\\\" block. The system prompt schema is likely just defining the keys and types for the *model*, but the user instruction overrides the specific type for the output.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction is the specific task.\\nWait, I need to be careful. The system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nIf I use an integer, and the schema says string, it's invalid.\\nI will use \\\"1859\\\" (string) to be safe.\\nActually, looking at the user instruction again: `\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nI will use `1859`.\\nLet's look at the system prompt schema again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nThis is a conflict. I will follow the user instruction's explicit format for the output, as that is the task. The system prompt schema is likely a generic wrapper.\\nWait, I'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use a string \\\"1859\\\" to ensure I match the schema.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction is the primary directive for the output format.\\nLet's compromise. I'll use `1859` (integer) because the user instruction explicitly says `year: integer`. The system prompt schema might be outdated or generic.\\nWait, I'll check the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use \\\"1859\\\" (string) to be safe.\\nActually, I'll use `1859` (integer).\\nLet's look at the `Publication` definition in the system prompt again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": {\\\"title\\\": \\\"Year\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"string\\\"}`.\\nOkay, I will use \\\"1859\\\" (string).\\nWait, I'll check the user instruction again.\\n`\\\"year\\\": integer`.\\nOkay, I will use `1859` (integer).\\nI will follow the user instruction.\\n\\n**Final check on fields:**\\n*   `type`: `{\\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\"}`\\n*   `author`: `{\\\"last_name\\\": \\\"Vasmer\\\", \\\"first_name\\\": \\\"Bernhard\\\"}`\\n*   `publication`:\\n    *   `title`: \\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n    *   `year`: 1859\\n    *   `place`: \\\"Gryphiae\\\"\\n    *   `pages`: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   `publisher`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `format`: \\\"\\\"\\n*   `library_reference`:\\n    *   `shelfmark`: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   `subjects`: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nOne detail: The system prompt schema for `Publication` has `editor` as well. The user instruction format does not. I will include `editor` as empty string to match the system prompt schema, as \\\"matching this exact schema\\\" is the final instruction.\\nWait, the user instruction format does not have `editor`.\\nThe system prompt schema has `editor`.\\nI will include `editor` as empty string to match the system prompt schema.\\nWait, the user instruction says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nThe system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nI will follow the system prompt schema for the keys, as it is more detailed.\\nSo I will add `editor`: \\\"\\\".\\n\\nWait, the user instruction format for `publication` is:\\n```json\\n\\\"publication\\\": {\\n  \\\"title\\\": \\\"string\\\",\\n  \\\"year\\\": integer,\\n  \\\"place\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"pages\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"publisher\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\",\\n  \\\"format\\\": \\\"string or empty string\\\"\\n}\\n```\\nThe system prompt schema for `Publication` is:\\n```json\\n\\\"Publication\\\": {\\n  \\\"properties\\\": {\\n    \\\"title\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"year\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"place\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"pages\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"publisher\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"format\\\": ...,\\n    \\\"editor\\\": ...\\n  },\\n  ...\\n}\\n```\\nI will follow the user instruction's format for the keys, as that is the specific task instruction. The system prompt schema is likely a generic definition.\\nWait, the system prompt says \\\"You MUST respond with valid JSON matching this exact schema\\\".\\nThis is a strong constraint. I will include `editor` if it's in the schema.\\nActually, I'll check the user instruction again. It says \\\"return it as a structured JSON object with the following exact format\\\".\\nI will follow the user instruction's format exactly.\\nSo no `editor`.\\nAnd `year` as integer.\\n\\nWait, I need to check the `type` field.\\nUser instruction: `\\\"type\\\": { \\\"type\\\": \\\"Dissertation or thesis\\\" OR \\\"Reference\\\" }`.\\nSystem prompt schema: `\\\"type\\\": {\\\"$ref\\\": \\\"#/$defs/WorkType\\\"}` where `WorkType` has `type` enum.\\nSo the structure is `{\\\"type\\\": {\\\"type\\\": \\\"...\\\"}}`.\\nI will follow the user instruction's structure.\\n\\nOkay, I'm ready.\\n\\nOne last check on the image text.\\n\\\"Vasmer, Bernhard\\\"\\n\\\"8.\\\"\\n\\\"De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\\"\\n\\\"Gryphiae 1859. 28 S.\\\"\\n\\\"Greifswald. D. med. 1859.\\\"\\n\\nAuthor: Vasmer, Bernhard.\\nTitle: De diagnosi differentiali carcinomatis ventriculi et ulceris chronici. Addita historia morbi ulceris ventriculi chronici pro carcinomate habiti.\\nYear: 1859.\\nPlace: Gryphiae.\\nPages: 28.\\nType: Dissertation or thesis.\\n\\nI will construct the JSON now.\\n\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1776794657,\"model\":\"qwen/qwen3.5-9b-20260310\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":null,\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":4419,\"prompt_tokens\":1804,\"total_tokens\":6223,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":4145,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":0,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.00084325,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.00084325,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.0001804,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.00066285}},\"provider\":\"Together\"}"}, "scoring": {"f1_micro": 0.74624765478424, "f1_macro": 0.6371863117870723, "micro_precision": 0.8604651162790697, "micro_recall": 0.6587991718426501, "total_instances": 263, "total_tp": 1591, "total_fp": 258, "total_fn": 824, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 496006, "total_output_tokens": 3098256, "total_tokens": 3594262, "input_cost_usd": 0.04960060000000002, "output_cost_usd": 0.46473840000000005, "total_cost_usd": 0.5143389999999999}}, "normalized_score": 63.71863117870723}