{"_id": {"$oid": "6a478c6124b401ab26c43dac"}, "test_id": "T1261", "benchmark": "general_meeting_minutes", "date": "2026-07-03", "tags": {"document-type": ["minutes"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["it", "fr", "de"], "layout": ["table"], "entry-type": ["person", "location"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["alexandra_binnenkade", "sven_lienhard", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "qwen/qwen3-vl-8b-thinking", "dataclass": "MinutesPage", "temperature": 0.0, "role_description": "You are a historian with expertise in analyzing and summarizing historical meeting minutes", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "Please extract the metadata according to the given output format.\nName and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields.\nLose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\nBe aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \"visual splitting characters\" between name and address.\nFilename: {filename}\nPage: {page_number}", "results": {"text": "{\"document\":\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\",\"page_number\":4,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"I\",\"name\":\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\",\"address\":\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Mr Marc BREHAM\",\"address\":\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"3\",\"name\":\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"168\",\"actions_p\":\"822\",\"no_de_voix\":\"990\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"4\",\"name\":\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"45\",\"actions_p\":\"355\",\"no_de_voix\":\"400\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"5\",\"name\":\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"6\",\"name\":\"Mr PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"7\",\"name\":\"Mr MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"601\",\"total_p\":\"2247\",\"total_voix\":\"2818\"}}", "model": "qwen/qwen3-vl-8b-thinking", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 3111, "output_tokens": 9826, "total_tokens": 12937, "input_cost_usd": 0.000363987, "output_cost_usd": 0.01341249, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.013776476999999999}, "duration": 109.04870009422302, "timestamp": "2026-07-03T09:51:43.155683", "parsed": {"document": "Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4", "page_number": 4, "entries": [{"number": "I", "name": "Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU", "address": "I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8", "actions_o": "179", "actions_p": "520", "no_de_voix": "699", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "2", "name": "Mr Marc BREHAM", "address": "La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che", "actions_o": "179", "actions_p": "520", "no_de_voix": "699", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "3", "name": "COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI", "address": "II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e", "actions_o": "168", "actions_p": "822", "no_de_voix": "990", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "4", "name": "St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS", "address": "II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e", "actions_o": "45", "actions_p": "355", "no_de_voix": "400", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "5", "name": "St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES", "address": "II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "10", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "6", "name": "Mr PANI Antonio", "address": "SESSA (Tessin) Suisse", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "10", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "7", "name": "Mr MASSON Daniel", "address": "Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "10", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}], "total_actions": {"total_o": "601", "total_p": "2247", "total_voix": "2818"}}, "conversation_id": "2848ea7b-65e6-4d0b-ae87-e33ad8d253d6", "score": {"fuzzy": 0.9194548981114581}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1783064994-LHsgFEKfy48rly54kDhU\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\",\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"I\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"168\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"822\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"990\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"3\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"45\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"355\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"400\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"4\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"5\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"6\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"7\\\",\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 4,\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"601\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2247\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"2818\\\"\\n  }\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"parsed\":{\"document\":\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\",\"page_number\":4,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"I\",\"name\":\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\",\"address\":\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Mr Marc BREHAM\",\"address\":\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"3\",\"name\":\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"168\",\"actions_p\":\"822\",\"no_de_voix\":\"990\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"4\",\"name\":\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"45\",\"actions_p\":\"355\",\"no_de_voix\":\"400\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"5\",\"name\":\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\",\"address\":\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"6\",\"name\":\"Mr PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"7\",\"name\":\"Mr MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"10\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"601\",\"total_p\":\"2247\",\"total_voix\":\"2818\"}},\"reasoning\":\"let's see. I need to extract the metadata from this meeting minutes image and format it according to the provided JSON schema. The user mentioned that the Name and Address are in the same table field but need to be split into separate fields. Also, I have to remove any dashes between name and address but keep the line breaks. Addresses with multiple dashes should keep them, only remove visual splitting characters.\\n\\nFirst, I'll look at the image. The table has columns: N\u00b0 d'ordre, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS Ordinaires, de Priorit\u00e9, NOMBRE DE VOIX, SIGNATURE.\\n\\nEach row corresponds to an entry. The first row is entry 1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8. Wait, the address here is split between two lines. The name part is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\", then the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the user says to split Name and Address into separate fields, so the name should be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and the address \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the instruction says to lose dashes between name and address, but preserve line breaks. Wait, the original table has a dash between the name and address parts. For example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". The problem says to remove dashes between name and address, so the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and the address starts with \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But wait, the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So perhaps the dash that's between the name and address (like the \\\"-\\\") should be removed, but internal dashes in the address should stay. For example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" becomes \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" as name and \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" as address. But the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So the dash that's splitting name and address is removed, but the dashes in the address are kept. So in entry 1, the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", and the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Here, the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Wait, but the original table has the name as \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\", so the name part is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So the dash after the name is removed, so name becomes \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the instruction says: \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\"\\n\\nSo the table field has the name followed by address, with a dash (or some visual splitting character) between them. We need to split them, so the name is before the dash, address after, but remove the dash.\\n\\nFor example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" becomes name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\" becomes name: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So perhaps the dash that's separating name and address is removed, but internal dashes in the address are kept.\\n\\nNow, looking at the entries:\\n\\nEntry 1:\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nBut wait, in the image, the first entry's name field is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". The \\\"- \\\" is the separator between name and address, so we need to split them there.\\n\\nBut in entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Here, the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So the \\\"- \\\" is part of the address, but the separator is the dash after the name. So we need to remove the dash after the name, but keep the dashes in the address.\\n\\nWait, the problem states: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So the dashes that are between name and address (the visual splitting characters) should be removed. So for example, if the name is \\\"Mr X - Y\\\", then \\\"Mr X\\\" is name, \\\"Y\\\" is address. But in the case where the address has dashes, like \\\"La Tuilerie - 78...\\\", those dashes are part of the address and should be preserved.\\n\\nSo in entry 2, the original text is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The separator here is the dash after \\\"BREHAM\\\", so the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The dashes in the address are kept.\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 3: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". The name is \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address is \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 4: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". So name: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 5: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". Same as above.\\n\\nEntry 6: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\" followed by \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\". So name: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nEntry 7: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" followed by \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So name: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"? Wait, original text for entry 7: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, the image shows: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So the separator is the dash after \\\"Daniel\\\", so name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, looking at the image:\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 7\\n\\nName field: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\"\\n\\nAddress field: \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nWait, no. The table has two rows for each entry? Wait, the image shows that each entry spans two rows. For example, entry 1 has:\\n\\nFirst row: \\\"I\\\" in the N\u00b0 column, then \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" as the name/address.\\n\\nWait, maybe the structure is that the name and address are split across two rows for each entry. Wait, looking at the image:\\n\\nThe columns are:\\n\\nN\u00b0 d'ordre | NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES | ACTIONS Ordinaires | de Priorit\u00e9 | NOMBRE DE VOIX | SIGNATURE\\n\\nFor entry 1:\\n\\nRow 1: I | Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - | I79 | 520 | 699\\n\\nRow 2: | I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8 | | | |\\n\\nWait, perhaps the \\\"NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE\\\" column is split into two parts: first line is the name, second line is the address. So for entry 1:\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\nName: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n\\nAddress: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\nWait, but the image shows:\\n\\nRow 2 for entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nWait, the N\u00b0 d'ordre is 2, then the name/address column has \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So perhaps the separator between name and address is the dash, but the address continues.\\n\\nWait, perhaps the way it's structured is that each entry's name and address are in two lines. For example, entry 1:\\n\\nFirst line (under NOM): Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\n\\nSecond line: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nBut the user says to split into Name and Address fields. So the Name would be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" (removing the dash), and the Address would be \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the image shows that in entry 1, the first line of the name/address column is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\", then the second line is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". So the dash is part of the name line, but according to the instructions, we should remove the dash between name and address.\\n\\nWait, perhaps the problem is that the name and address are in the same cell, split by a dash. So for each entry, the name is followed by a dash and then the address. So we need to split them there.\\n\\nFor example, entry 1:\\n\\n\\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"\\n\\nHere, the \\\"- \\\" is the separator between name and address. So name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\n\\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nEntry 3:\\n\\n\\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nEntry 4:\\n\\n\\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nSame.\\n\\nEntry 5:\\n\\n\\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nEntry 6:\\n\\n\\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\" followed by \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\"\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\n\\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" followed by \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nSo for entry 7, name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, no. Original entry 7:\\n\\nName line: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\"\\n\\nAddress line: \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nBut according to the separator instruction, the dash between name and address is to be removed. So the name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", and the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, but the address line starts with \\\"Avenue de la Cava\\\", which is part of the address. So perhaps the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, maybe the entry 7's name and address are split as:\\n\\nName: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n\\nAddress: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nBecause the first line of the name/address column is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\", so the separator is the dash after \\\"Daniel\\\", making the name \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\" and address \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, but in the image, the address line for entry 7 is \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So perhaps the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\", which is split across two lines.\\n\\nThis is getting a bit complicated. Let's process each entry one by one.\\n\\nFirst, let's list all entries:\\n\\n1. Entry I:\\n   - Name: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n   - Address: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\n2. Entry 2:\\n   - Name: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n   - Address: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\n3. Entry 3:\\n   - Name: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n4. Entry 4:\\n   - Name: St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n5. Entry 5:\\n   - Name: St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n6. Entry 6:\\n   - Name: Mr PANI Antonio\\n   - Address: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n\\n7. Entry 7:\\n   - Name: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n   - Address: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nWait, for entry 7, the name/address column has \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" on the first line and \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\" on the second line. So the separator dash is between name and address, so name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, the other fields:\\n\\n- Number (N\u00b0 d'ordre): entries are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.\\n\\n- Actions O (Ordinaires): numbers like 179, 179, 168, 45, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- Actions P (de Priorit\u00e9): 520, 520, 822, 355, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- No De Voix (NOMBRE DE VOIX): 699, 699, 990, 400, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- Signature Present: All are blank, so false.\\n\\n- Signature: empty.\\n\\nAlso, the Total Actions:\\n\\nTotal O: sum of Actions O: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 179+179=358, +168=526, +45=571, +10*3=60. Total O: 571+60=631.\\n\\nWait, but the bottom of the image has \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with some numbers. Let me check:\\n\\nAt the bottom, there's a line:\\n\\nA REPORTER | 601 | 2217 | 2818\\n\\nWait, the columns for A REPORTER would be:\\n\\n- Actions Ordinaires: 601\\n\\n- Actions de Priorit\u00e9: 2217\\n\\n- NOMBRE DE VOIX: 2818\\n\\nBut the Total Actions in the schema should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 2217\\n\\ntotal_voix: 2818\\n\\nWait, but the entries are 7, but the \\\"A REPORTER\\\" line seems to be a summary. Wait, in the original problem statement, the user provided the image, which includes a line at the bottom: \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with numbers 601, 2217, 2818.\\n\\nBut the instructions say: the total_actions should be the sum of all entries. Wait, looking at the entries:\\n\\nEach entry has Actions O and P. Let's sum them:\\n\\nEntry 1: O=179, P=520 \u2192 total O=179, total P=520\\n\\nEntry 2: O=179, P=520\\n\\nEntry 3: O=168, P=822\\n\\nEntry 4: O=45, P=355\\n\\nEntry 5: O=10, P=10\\n\\nEntry 6: O=10, P=10\\n\\nEntry 7: O=10, P=10\\n\\nSum of O: 179+179=358; 358+168=526; 526+45=571; 571+10=581; 581+10=591; 591+10=601.\\n\\nSum of P: 520+520=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10=2227; 2227+10=2237; 2237+10=2247.\\n\\nBut the bottom line says \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with 601, 2217, 2818.\\n\\nWait, the entries' O sum is 601, which matches the A REPORTER O value.\\n\\nThe P sum: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = 520*2=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10*3=2247. But the A REPORTER P is 2217. Hmm, discrepancy here.\\n\\nWait, maybe the A REPORTER line is a different summary. Let's check:\\n\\nThe columns at the bottom:\\n\\nN\u00b0 d'ordre: (probably empty)\\n\\nNOM: A REPORTER\\n\\nACTIONS Ordinaires: 601\\n\\nde Priorit\u00e9: 2217\\n\\nNOMBRE DE VOIX: 2818\\n\\nSo the total actions O is 601, which matches the sum of O from entries.\\n\\nTotal actions P: 2217, which is the sum of P from entries: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = let's calculate again:\\n\\n520 (entry1) + 520 (entry2) = 1040\\n\\n+822 (entry3) = 1862\\n\\n+355 (entry4) = 2217\\n\\n+10 (entry5) = 2227\\n\\n+10 (entry6) = 2237\\n\\n+10 (entry7) = 2247\\n\\nWait, but according to A REPORTER, it's 2217. So why the discrepancy?\\n\\nAh, maybe entry4's Actions P is 355, which when added to previous sum (1862 + 355 = 2217), then entries 5,6,7 have 10 each, so 10*3=30. So total P would be 2217 + 30 = 2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So perhaps the entries 5,6,7 have P=10, but maybe in the image, the values are different.\\n\\nLooking back at the image:\\n\\nEntry 5: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\" | IO | IO\\n\\nSo Actions O: 10, Actions P: 10\\n\\nEntry 6: same, 10 and 10\\n\\nEntry 7: same, 10 and 10\\n\\nSo total O: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 179*2=358; 358+168=526; 526+45=571; 571+10*3=601.\\n\\nTotal P: 520*2=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10*3=2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So maybe the entries 5,6,7's P values are actually 0? No, the image shows \\\"IO\\\" which is probably \\\"10\\\".\\n\\nWait, maybe the \\\"IO\\\" is written as 10, but in the sum, the P sum is 2217 (from entry1-4) plus 10*3=30, totaling 2247. But the A REPORTER says 2217. Hmm, maybe the A REPORTER is the sum of entries 1-4 only?\\n\\nWait, maybe the entries 5,6,7 have different values. Let me check the image again.\\n\\nFor entry 5: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" | II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e | IO | IO | IO\\n\\nWait, the columns for entry 5: Actions Ordinaires: IO (probably 10), de Priorit\u00e9: IO (10), Voix: IO (10)\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 6: same.\\n\\nEntry 7: same.\\n\\nSo sum of P:\\n\\nEntries 1-4: 520 + 520 + 822 + 355 = 520+520=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217\\n\\nEntries 5-7: 10 each, so 30.\\n\\nTotal P: 2217 + 30 = 2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So perhaps the \\\"A REPORTER\\\" line is just a summary of the previous entries (1-4), and entries 5-7 are separate.\\n\\nWait, but the problem statement says that the Total Actions should be the sum of all entries. So the correct total_actions should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601 (sum of all O)\\n\\ntotal_p: 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: sum of Voix: 699+699+990+400+10+10+10 = 699*2=1398; 1398+990=2388; 2388+400=2788; 2788+10*3=2818.\\n\\nAh, the Voix sum is 2818, which matches the A REPORTER's Voix value.\\n\\nSo the Total Actions should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: 2818\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P, which is sum of entries 1-4. However, the problem says that the total_actions is the sum of all entries, so we should take the sum of all entries, which would be 2247.\\n\\nWait, but the user instruction says: \\\"Your task is to extract the metadata according to the given output format.\\\" The output schema includes total_actions, which should be the sum of all entries.\\n\\nNow, moving to the entries.\\n\\nEach entry has:\\n\\n- number: the N\u00b0 d'ordre (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)\\n\\n- name: extracted from the name part\\n\\n- address: extracted from address part\\n\\n- actions_o: Actions Ordinaires (179,179,168,45,10,10,10)\\n\\n- actions_p: Actions de Priorit\u00e9 (520,520,822,355,10,10,10)\\n\\n- no_de_voix: NOMBRE DE VOIX (699,699,990,400,10,10,10)\\n\\n- signature_present: false for all (as signature fields are empty)\\n\\n- signature: empty string\\n\\nNow, let's process each entry.\\n\\nEntry 1:\\n\\nN\u00b0: I\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nWait, but the address line is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" - the \\\"I32\\\" might be \\\"132\\\", but as per the image, it's written as \\\"I32\\\".\\n\\nWait, the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the user says to preserve linebreaks, so if the address spans multiple lines, but in this case, it's all in one line.\\n\\nEntry 2:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 2\\n\\nName: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n\\nAddress: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\nEntry 3:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 3\\n\\nName: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 4:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 4\\n\\nName: St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 5:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 5\\n\\nName: St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 6:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 6\\n\\nName: Mr PANI Antonio\\n\\nAddress: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 7\\n\\nName: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n\\nAddress: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nWait, for entry 7, the address line is \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So the name part is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", and address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, check if the addresses have any dashes to be preserved. For example, entry 2's address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The dash here is part of the address, so it's kept.\\n\\nNow, the \\\"no_de_voix\\\" for entry 7: 10.\\n\\nNow, the entries:\\n\\n1. number: \\\"I\\\", name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\", actions_o: \\\"179\\\", actions_p: \\\"520\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"699\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n2. number: \\\"2\\\", name: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\", actions_o: \\\"179\\\", actions_p: \\\"520\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"699\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n3. number: \\\"3\\\", name: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"168\\\", actions_p: \\\"822\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"990\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n4. number: \\\"4\\\", name: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"45\\\", actions_p: \\\"355\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"400\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n5. number: \\\"5\\\", name: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n6. number: \\\"6\\\", name: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n7. number: \\\"7\\\", name: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nNow, the total_actions:\\n\\ntotal_o: sum of actions_o for all entries: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: 699+699+990+400+10+10+10 = 2818\\n\\nNow, check the document name: \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\", page number 4.\\n\\nNow, compiling the JSON structure.\\n\\nThe required fields:\\n\\ndocument: \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\"\\n\\npage_number: 4\\n\\nentries: array of 7 entries as described.\\n\\ntotal_actions: {total_o: \\\"601\\\", total_p: \\\"2247\\\", total_voix: \\\"2818\\\"}\\n\\nCheck if all required fields are present.\\n\\nNow, for each entry, check the fields:\\n\\n- number: must be string (e.g., \\\"I\\\", \\\"2\\\", etc.)\\n\\n- name: string\\n\\n- address: string\\n\\n- actions_o: string\\n\\n- actions_p: string\\n\\n- no_de_voix: string\\n\\n- signature_present: boolean (false)\\n\\n- signature: string (empty)\\n\\nYes.\\n\\nNow, let's write the JSON.\\n\\nWait, in entry 1, the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". Wait, the original image for entry 1 has:\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - \\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nSo the dash between name and address is removed, so name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2's name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nEntry 3's name is \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address is \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 4: name \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 5: same as entry 4.\\n\\nEntry 6: name \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nEntry 7: name \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, the JSON should be structured as per the schema.\\n\\nCheck if \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\" for entry 6 address is correctly written. The image shows \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nAlso, entry 6's address has \\\"(Tessin) Suisse\\\", which is correct.\\n\\nEntry 7's address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, write the JSON.\\n\\nMake sure that all fields are correctly filled.\\n\\nNote: The user said to lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. In entries where address spans multiple lines (like entry 1's address is on the same line as name), we split them.\\n\\nBut in the image, each entry's name and address are in two rows, so the first row is name part, second row is address part. So for example, entry 1 has:\\n\\nRow 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\"\\n\\nRow 2: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"\\n\\nBut according to instructions, remove the dash between name and address, so name becomes \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\nRow 1: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\"\\n\\nRow 2: \\\"78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nYes.\\n\\nNow, the JSON structure:\\n\\n{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\",\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 4,\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"I\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"3\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"168\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"822\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"990\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"4\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"45\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"355\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"400\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"5\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"6\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"7\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"601\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2247\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"2818\\\"\\n  }\\n}\\n\\nWait, but in the schema, the total_actions should be an object with total_o, total_p, total_voix as strings.\\n\\nCheck if all required fields are present.\\n\\nYes. Now, check if the \\\"no_de_voix\\\" is correct for each entry.\\n\\nEntry 1: 699, correct.\\n\\nEntry 2: 699, correct.\\n\\nEntry 3: 990, correct.\\n\\nEntry 4: 400, correct.\\n\\nEntries 5-7: 10 each.\\n\\nSumming up, total_voix is 699*2=1398 + 990=2388 + 400=2788 + 10*3=2818. Correct.\\n\\nTotal_o: 179*2=358 +168=526 +45=571 +10*3=601. Correct.\\n\\nTotal_p: 520*2=1040 +822=1862 +355=2217 +10*3=2247. Correct.\\n\\nLooks good.\\n\\nAlso, the signature_present is false for all, as there are no signatures.\\n\\nAddresses have the required dashes preserved.\\n\\nNames don't have dashes between name and address anymore.\\n\\nThis should meet the schema requirements.\\n\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"let's see. I need to extract the metadata from this meeting minutes image and format it according to the provided JSON schema. The user mentioned that the Name and Address are in the same table field but need to be split into separate fields. Also, I have to remove any dashes between name and address but keep the line breaks. Addresses with multiple dashes should keep them, only remove visual splitting characters.\\n\\nFirst, I'll look at the image. The table has columns: N\u00b0 d'ordre, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS Ordinaires, de Priorit\u00e9, NOMBRE DE VOIX, SIGNATURE.\\n\\nEach row corresponds to an entry. The first row is entry 1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8. Wait, the address here is split between two lines. The name part is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\", then the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the user says to split Name and Address into separate fields, so the name should be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and the address \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the instruction says to lose dashes between name and address, but preserve line breaks. Wait, the original table has a dash between the name and address parts. For example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". The problem says to remove dashes between name and address, so the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and the address starts with \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But wait, the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So perhaps the dash that's between the name and address (like the \\\"-\\\") should be removed, but internal dashes in the address should stay. For example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" becomes \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" as name and \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" as address. But the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So the dash that's splitting name and address is removed, but the dashes in the address are kept. So in entry 1, the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", and the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Here, the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Wait, but the original table has the name as \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\", so the name part is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So the dash after the name is removed, so name becomes \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the instruction says: \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\"\\n\\nSo the table field has the name followed by address, with a dash (or some visual splitting character) between them. We need to split them, so the name is before the dash, address after, but remove the dash.\\n\\nFor example, in entry 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" becomes name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\" becomes name: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the user says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So perhaps the dash that's separating name and address is removed, but internal dashes in the address are kept.\\n\\nNow, looking at the entries:\\n\\nEntry 1:\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nBut wait, in the image, the first entry's name field is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". The \\\"- \\\" is the separator between name and address, so we need to split them there.\\n\\nBut in entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". Here, the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So the \\\"- \\\" is part of the address, but the separator is the dash after the name. So we need to remove the dash after the name, but keep the dashes in the address.\\n\\nWait, the problem states: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So the dashes that are between name and address (the visual splitting characters) should be removed. So for example, if the name is \\\"Mr X - Y\\\", then \\\"Mr X\\\" is name, \\\"Y\\\" is address. But in the case where the address has dashes, like \\\"La Tuilerie - 78...\\\", those dashes are part of the address and should be preserved.\\n\\nSo in entry 2, the original text is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The separator here is the dash after \\\"BREHAM\\\", so the name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", and the address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The dashes in the address are kept.\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 3: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". The name is \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address is \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 4: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". So name: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 5: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". Same as above.\\n\\nEntry 6: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\" followed by \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\". So name: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nEntry 7: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" followed by \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So name: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"? Wait, original text for entry 7: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, the image shows: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So the separator is the dash after \\\"Daniel\\\", so name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, looking at the image:\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 7\\n\\nName field: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\"\\n\\nAddress field: \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nWait, no. The table has two rows for each entry? Wait, the image shows that each entry spans two rows. For example, entry 1 has:\\n\\nFirst row: \\\"I\\\" in the N\u00b0 column, then \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" as the name/address.\\n\\nWait, maybe the structure is that the name and address are split across two rows for each entry. Wait, looking at the image:\\n\\nThe columns are:\\n\\nN\u00b0 d'ordre | NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES | ACTIONS Ordinaires | de Priorit\u00e9 | NOMBRE DE VOIX | SIGNATURE\\n\\nFor entry 1:\\n\\nRow 1: I | Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - | I79 | 520 | 699\\n\\nRow 2: | I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8 | | | |\\n\\nWait, perhaps the \\\"NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE\\\" column is split into two parts: first line is the name, second line is the address. So for entry 1:\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\nName: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n\\nAddress: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\nWait, but the image shows:\\n\\nRow 2 for entry 2: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nWait, the N\u00b0 d'ordre is 2, then the name/address column has \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". So perhaps the separator between name and address is the dash, but the address continues.\\n\\nWait, perhaps the way it's structured is that each entry's name and address are in two lines. For example, entry 1:\\n\\nFirst line (under NOM): Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\n\\nSecond line: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nBut the user says to split into Name and Address fields. So the Name would be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" (removing the dash), and the Address would be \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nWait, but the image shows that in entry 1, the first line of the name/address column is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\", then the second line is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". So the dash is part of the name line, but according to the instructions, we should remove the dash between name and address.\\n\\nWait, perhaps the problem is that the name and address are in the same cell, split by a dash. So for each entry, the name is followed by a dash and then the address. So we need to split them there.\\n\\nFor example, entry 1:\\n\\n\\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"\\n\\nHere, the \\\"- \\\" is the separator between name and address. So name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\n\\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nEntry 3:\\n\\n\\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nEntry 4:\\n\\n\\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nSame.\\n\\nEntry 5:\\n\\n\\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" followed by \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\"\\n\\nEntry 6:\\n\\n\\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\" followed by \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\"\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\n\\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" followed by \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nSo for entry 7, name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, no. Original entry 7:\\n\\nName line: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\"\\n\\nAddress line: \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\"\\n\\nBut according to the separator instruction, the dash between name and address is to be removed. So the name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", and the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". Wait, but the address line starts with \\\"Avenue de la Cava\\\", which is part of the address. So perhaps the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, maybe the entry 7's name and address are split as:\\n\\nName: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n\\nAddress: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nBecause the first line of the name/address column is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\", so the separator is the dash after \\\"Daniel\\\", making the name \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\" and address \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nWait, but in the image, the address line for entry 7 is \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So perhaps the address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\", which is split across two lines.\\n\\nThis is getting a bit complicated. Let's process each entry one by one.\\n\\nFirst, let's list all entries:\\n\\n1. Entry I:\\n   - Name: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n   - Address: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\n2. Entry 2:\\n   - Name: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n   - Address: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\n3. Entry 3:\\n   - Name: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n4. Entry 4:\\n   - Name: St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n5. Entry 5:\\n   - Name: St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\n   - Address: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\n6. Entry 6:\\n   - Name: Mr PANI Antonio\\n   - Address: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n\\n7. Entry 7:\\n   - Name: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n   - Address: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nWait, for entry 7, the name/address column has \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" on the first line and \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\" on the second line. So the separator dash is between name and address, so name is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, the other fields:\\n\\n- Number (N\u00b0 d'ordre): entries are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.\\n\\n- Actions O (Ordinaires): numbers like 179, 179, 168, 45, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- Actions P (de Priorit\u00e9): 520, 520, 822, 355, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- No De Voix (NOMBRE DE VOIX): 699, 699, 990, 400, 10, 10, 10.\\n\\n- Signature Present: All are blank, so false.\\n\\n- Signature: empty.\\n\\nAlso, the Total Actions:\\n\\nTotal O: sum of Actions O: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 179+179=358, +168=526, +45=571, +10*3=60. Total O: 571+60=631.\\n\\nWait, but the bottom of the image has \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with some numbers. Let me check:\\n\\nAt the bottom, there's a line:\\n\\nA REPORTER | 601 | 2217 | 2818\\n\\nWait, the columns for A REPORTER would be:\\n\\n- Actions Ordinaires: 601\\n\\n- Actions de Priorit\u00e9: 2217\\n\\n- NOMBRE DE VOIX: 2818\\n\\nBut the Total Actions in the schema should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 2217\\n\\ntotal_voix: 2818\\n\\nWait, but the entries are 7, but the \\\"A REPORTER\\\" line seems to be a summary. Wait, in the original problem statement, the user provided the image, which includes a line at the bottom: \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with numbers 601, 2217, 2818.\\n\\nBut the instructions say: the total_actions should be the sum of all entries. Wait, looking at the entries:\\n\\nEach entry has Actions O and P. Let's sum them:\\n\\nEntry 1: O=179, P=520 \u2192 total O=179, total P=520\\n\\nEntry 2: O=179, P=520\\n\\nEntry 3: O=168, P=822\\n\\nEntry 4: O=45, P=355\\n\\nEntry 5: O=10, P=10\\n\\nEntry 6: O=10, P=10\\n\\nEntry 7: O=10, P=10\\n\\nSum of O: 179+179=358; 358+168=526; 526+45=571; 571+10=581; 581+10=591; 591+10=601.\\n\\nSum of P: 520+520=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10=2227; 2227+10=2237; 2237+10=2247.\\n\\nBut the bottom line says \\\"A REPORTER\\\" with 601, 2217, 2818.\\n\\nWait, the entries' O sum is 601, which matches the A REPORTER O value.\\n\\nThe P sum: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = 520*2=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10*3=2247. But the A REPORTER P is 2217. Hmm, discrepancy here.\\n\\nWait, maybe the A REPORTER line is a different summary. Let's check:\\n\\nThe columns at the bottom:\\n\\nN\u00b0 d'ordre: (probably empty)\\n\\nNOM: A REPORTER\\n\\nACTIONS Ordinaires: 601\\n\\nde Priorit\u00e9: 2217\\n\\nNOMBRE DE VOIX: 2818\\n\\nSo the total actions O is 601, which matches the sum of O from entries.\\n\\nTotal actions P: 2217, which is the sum of P from entries: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = let's calculate again:\\n\\n520 (entry1) + 520 (entry2) = 1040\\n\\n+822 (entry3) = 1862\\n\\n+355 (entry4) = 2217\\n\\n+10 (entry5) = 2227\\n\\n+10 (entry6) = 2237\\n\\n+10 (entry7) = 2247\\n\\nWait, but according to A REPORTER, it's 2217. So why the discrepancy?\\n\\nAh, maybe entry4's Actions P is 355, which when added to previous sum (1862 + 355 = 2217), then entries 5,6,7 have 10 each, so 10*3=30. So total P would be 2217 + 30 = 2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So perhaps the entries 5,6,7 have P=10, but maybe in the image, the values are different.\\n\\nLooking back at the image:\\n\\nEntry 5: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\" | IO | IO\\n\\nSo Actions O: 10, Actions P: 10\\n\\nEntry 6: same, 10 and 10\\n\\nEntry 7: same, 10 and 10\\n\\nSo total O: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 179*2=358; 358+168=526; 526+45=571; 571+10*3=601.\\n\\nTotal P: 520*2=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217; 2217+10*3=2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So maybe the entries 5,6,7's P values are actually 0? No, the image shows \\\"IO\\\" which is probably \\\"10\\\".\\n\\nWait, maybe the \\\"IO\\\" is written as 10, but in the sum, the P sum is 2217 (from entry1-4) plus 10*3=30, totaling 2247. But the A REPORTER says 2217. Hmm, maybe the A REPORTER is the sum of entries 1-4 only?\\n\\nWait, maybe the entries 5,6,7 have different values. Let me check the image again.\\n\\nFor entry 5: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" | II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e | IO | IO | IO\\n\\nWait, the columns for entry 5: Actions Ordinaires: IO (probably 10), de Priorit\u00e9: IO (10), Voix: IO (10)\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 6: same.\\n\\nEntry 7: same.\\n\\nSo sum of P:\\n\\nEntries 1-4: 520 + 520 + 822 + 355 = 520+520=1040; 1040+822=1862; 1862+355=2217\\n\\nEntries 5-7: 10 each, so 30.\\n\\nTotal P: 2217 + 30 = 2247.\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P. So perhaps the \\\"A REPORTER\\\" line is just a summary of the previous entries (1-4), and entries 5-7 are separate.\\n\\nWait, but the problem statement says that the Total Actions should be the sum of all entries. So the correct total_actions should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601 (sum of all O)\\n\\ntotal_p: 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: sum of Voix: 699+699+990+400+10+10+10 = 699*2=1398; 1398+990=2388; 2388+400=2788; 2788+10*3=2818.\\n\\nAh, the Voix sum is 2818, which matches the A REPORTER's Voix value.\\n\\nSo the Total Actions should be:\\n\\ntotal_o: 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: 2818\\n\\nBut the A REPORTER line shows 2217 for P, which is sum of entries 1-4. However, the problem says that the total_actions is the sum of all entries, so we should take the sum of all entries, which would be 2247.\\n\\nWait, but the user instruction says: \\\"Your task is to extract the metadata according to the given output format.\\\" The output schema includes total_actions, which should be the sum of all entries.\\n\\nNow, moving to the entries.\\n\\nEach entry has:\\n\\n- number: the N\u00b0 d'ordre (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)\\n\\n- name: extracted from the name part\\n\\n- address: extracted from address part\\n\\n- actions_o: Actions Ordinaires (179,179,168,45,10,10,10)\\n\\n- actions_p: Actions de Priorit\u00e9 (520,520,822,355,10,10,10)\\n\\n- no_de_voix: NOMBRE DE VOIX (699,699,990,400,10,10,10)\\n\\n- signature_present: false for all (as signature fields are empty)\\n\\n- signature: empty string\\n\\nNow, let's process each entry.\\n\\nEntry 1:\\n\\nN\u00b0: I\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nWait, but the address line is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" - the \\\"I32\\\" might be \\\"132\\\", but as per the image, it's written as \\\"I32\\\".\\n\\nWait, the address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". But the user says to preserve linebreaks, so if the address spans multiple lines, but in this case, it's all in one line.\\n\\nEntry 2:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 2\\n\\nName: Mr Marc BREHAM\\n\\nAddress: La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\n\\nEntry 3:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 3\\n\\nName: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 4:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 4\\n\\nName: St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 5:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 5\\n\\nName: St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\n\\nAddress: II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nEntry 6:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 6\\n\\nName: Mr PANI Antonio\\n\\nAddress: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n\\nEntry 7:\\n\\nN\u00b0: 7\\n\\nName: Mr MASSON Daniel\\n\\nAddress: Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\n\\nWait, for entry 7, the address line is \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So the name part is \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", and address is \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, check if the addresses have any dashes to be preserved. For example, entry 2's address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\". The dash here is part of the address, so it's kept.\\n\\nNow, the \\\"no_de_voix\\\" for entry 7: 10.\\n\\nNow, the entries:\\n\\n1. number: \\\"I\\\", name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\", actions_o: \\\"179\\\", actions_p: \\\"520\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"699\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n2. number: \\\"2\\\", name: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\", actions_o: \\\"179\\\", actions_p: \\\"520\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"699\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n3. number: \\\"3\\\", name: \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"168\\\", actions_p: \\\"822\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"990\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n4. number: \\\"4\\\", name: \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"45\\\", actions_p: \\\"355\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"400\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n5. number: \\\"5\\\", name: \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\", address: \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n6. number: \\\"6\\\", name: \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n7. number: \\\"7\\\", name: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\", actions_o: \\\"10\\\", actions_p: \\\"10\\\", no_de_voix: \\\"10\\\", signature_present: false, signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nNow, the total_actions:\\n\\ntotal_o: sum of actions_o for all entries: 179+179+168+45+10+10+10 = 601\\n\\ntotal_p: 520+520+822+355+10+10+10 = 2247\\n\\ntotal_voix: 699+699+990+400+10+10+10 = 2818\\n\\nNow, check the document name: \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\", page number 4.\\n\\nNow, compiling the JSON structure.\\n\\nThe required fields:\\n\\ndocument: \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\"\\n\\npage_number: 4\\n\\nentries: array of 7 entries as described.\\n\\ntotal_actions: {total_o: \\\"601\\\", total_p: \\\"2247\\\", total_voix: \\\"2818\\\"}\\n\\nCheck if all required fields are present.\\n\\nNow, for each entry, check the fields:\\n\\n- number: must be string (e.g., \\\"I\\\", \\\"2\\\", etc.)\\n\\n- name: string\\n\\n- address: string\\n\\n- actions_o: string\\n\\n- actions_p: string\\n\\n- no_de_voix: string\\n\\n- signature_present: boolean (false)\\n\\n- signature: string (empty)\\n\\nYes.\\n\\nNow, let's write the JSON.\\n\\nWait, in entry 1, the name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". Wait, the original image for entry 1 has:\\n\\nName: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - \\n\\nAddress: I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nSo the dash between name and address is removed, so name is \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address is \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2's name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nEntry 3's name is \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\", address is \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 4: name \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\", address \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\".\\n\\nEntry 5: same as entry 4.\\n\\nEntry 6: name \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\", address \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nEntry 7: name \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\", address \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, the JSON should be structured as per the schema.\\n\\nCheck if \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\" for entry 6 address is correctly written. The image shows \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\".\\n\\nAlso, entry 6's address has \\\"(Tessin) Suisse\\\", which is correct.\\n\\nEntry 7's address: \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\".\\n\\nNow, write the JSON.\\n\\nMake sure that all fields are correctly filled.\\n\\nNote: The user said to lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. In entries where address spans multiple lines (like entry 1's address is on the same line as name), we split them.\\n\\nBut in the image, each entry's name and address are in two rows, so the first row is name part, second row is address part. So for example, entry 1 has:\\n\\nRow 1: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\"\\n\\nRow 2: \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"\\n\\nBut according to instructions, remove the dash between name and address, so name becomes \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\", address \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\".\\n\\nSimilarly, entry 2:\\n\\nRow 1: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\"\\n\\nRow 2: \\\"78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\"\\n\\nName: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address: \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\".\\n\\nYes.\\n\\nNow, the JSON structure:\\n\\n{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Bilanz1967_page_4\\\",\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 4,\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"I\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"I32 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret@che\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"3\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"168\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"822\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"990\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"4\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"45\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"355\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"400\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"5\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"St\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"6\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"7\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Villa La Cava Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"601\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2247\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"2818\\\"\\n  }\\n}\\n\\nWait, but in the schema, the total_actions should be an object with total_o, total_p, total_voix as strings.\\n\\nCheck if all required fields are present.\\n\\nYes. Now, check if the \\\"no_de_voix\\\" is correct for each entry.\\n\\nEntry 1: 699, correct.\\n\\nEntry 2: 699, correct.\\n\\nEntry 3: 990, correct.\\n\\nEntry 4: 400, correct.\\n\\nEntries 5-7: 10 each.\\n\\nSumming up, total_voix is 699*2=1398 + 990=2388 + 400=2788 + 10*3=2818. Correct.\\n\\nTotal_o: 179*2=358 +168=526 +45=571 +10*3=601. Correct.\\n\\nTotal_p: 520*2=1040 +822=1862 +355=2217 +10*3=2247. Correct.\\n\\nLooks good.\\n\\nAlso, the signature_present is false for all, as there are no signatures.\\n\\nAddresses have the required dashes preserved.\\n\\nNames don't have dashes between name and address anymore.\\n\\nThis should meet the schema requirements.\\n\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1783064994,\"model\":\"qwen/qwen3-vl-8b-thinking\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":null,\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":9826,\"prompt_tokens\":3111,\"total_tokens\":12937,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":9104,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":0,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.013776477,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.013776477,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.000363987,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.01341249}},\"provider\":\"Alibaba\"}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.7374287419567598, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 28064, "total_output_tokens": 94504, "total_tokens": 122568, "input_cost_usd": 0.003283488, "output_cost_usd": 0.12899796, "total_cost_usd": 0.132281448}}, "normalized_score": 73.74287419567598}