{"_id": {"$oid": "6a66748861a88b1924cbcf9f"}, "test_id": "T1269", "benchmark": "general_meeting_minutes", "date": "2026-07-03", "tags": {"document-type": ["minutes"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["it", "fr", "de"], "layout": ["table"], "entry-type": ["person", "location"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["alexandra_binnenkade", "sven_lienhard", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "qwen/qwen3.6-plus", "dataclass": "MinutesPage", "temperature": 0.0, "role_description": "You are a historian with expertise in analyzing and summarizing historical meeting minutes", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "Please extract the metadata according to the given output format.\nName and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields.\nLose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\nBe aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \"visual splitting characters\" between name and address.\nFilename: {filename}\nPage: {page_number}", "results": {"text": "{\"document\":\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\",\"page_number\":3,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"21\",\"name\":\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\",\"address\":\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\",\"actions_o\":\"2\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"22\",\"name\":\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\",\"address\":\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Aut. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"23\",\"name\":\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\",\"address\":\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\nBRUXELLES.\",\"actions_o\":\"\",\"actions_p\":\"150\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"24\",\"name\":\"M.MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Ant. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"25\",\"name\":\"M. PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"1\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Ant. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"26\",\"name\":\"M. POUQUET Maurice\",\"address\":\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"27\",\"name\":\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\",\"address\":\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"28\",\"name\":\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\",\"address\":\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\nNICE (A-M)\",\"actions_o\":\"32\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"29\",\"name\":\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\",\"address\":\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"30\",\"name\":\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\",\"address\":\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"933\",\"total_p\":\"2,554\",\"total_voix\":\"\"}}", "model": "qwen/qwen3.6-plus-04-02", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 3122, "output_tokens": 10205, "total_tokens": 13327, "input_cost_usd": 0.0010146500000000002, "output_cost_usd": 0.01989975, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.0209144}, "duration": 207.81488919258118, "timestamp": "2026-07-03T11:52:08.151616", "parsed": {"document": "Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3", "page_number": 3, "entries": [{"number": "21", "name": "M.de la FONTAINE Lionel", "address": "Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA", "actions_o": "2", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "22", "name": "M.LAUMAIN Robert", "address": "24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE", "actions_o": "1", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": true, "signature": "Aut. Pavi"}, {"number": "23", "name": "Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)", "address": "1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\nBRUXELLES.", "actions_o": "", "actions_p": "150", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "24", "name": "M.MASSON Daniel", "address": "3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": true, "signature": "Ant. Pavi"}, {"number": "25", "name": "M. PANI Antonio", "address": "SESSA (Tessin) Suisse", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "1", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": true, "signature": "Ant. Pavi"}, {"number": "26", "name": "M. POUQUET Maurice", "address": "Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)", "actions_o": "1", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "27", "name": "Mme RAOULT Suzanne", "address": "195 rue de Grenelle PARIS", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "28", "name": "Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)", "address": "37bis Promenade des Anglais\nNICE (A-M)", "actions_o": "32", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "29", "name": "Mme SAVAEY M.L.", "address": "5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "30", "name": "M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe", "address": "34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)", "actions_o": "1", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}], "total_actions": {"total_o": "933", "total_p": "2,554", "total_voix": ""}}, "conversation_id": "21516911-aaf0-4161-a312-b5c9d546833a", "score": {"fuzzy": 0.9584734998015382}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1783072121-fCY51Z1RGA7awz7eKVPZ\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n    \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\",\\n    \\\"page_number\\\": 3,\\n    \\\"entries\\\": [\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"21\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"22\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"23\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"150\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"24\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"25\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"26\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"27\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"28\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"32\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"29\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        },\\n        {\\n           \\\"number\\\": \\\"30\\\",\\n           \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\",\\n           \\\"address\\\": \\\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n           \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n           \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n           \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n        }\\n    ],\\n    \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n        \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"933\\\",\\n        \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2,554\\\",\\n        \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"parsed\":{\"document\":\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\",\"page_number\":3,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"21\",\"name\":\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\",\"address\":\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\",\"actions_o\":\"2\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"22\",\"name\":\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\",\"address\":\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Aut. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"23\",\"name\":\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\",\"address\":\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\nBRUXELLES.\",\"actions_o\":\"\",\"actions_p\":\"150\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"24\",\"name\":\"M.MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Ant. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"25\",\"name\":\"M. PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"1\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":true,\"signature\":\"Ant. Pavi\"},{\"number\":\"26\",\"name\":\"M. POUQUET Maurice\",\"address\":\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"27\",\"name\":\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\",\"address\":\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"28\",\"name\":\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\",\"address\":\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\nNICE (A-M)\",\"actions_o\":\"32\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"29\",\"name\":\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\",\"address\":\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"30\",\"name\":\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\",\"address\":\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\",\"actions_o\":\"1\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"933\",\"total_p\":\"2,554\",\"total_voix\":\"\"}},\"reasoning\":\"The user wants me to extract data from a table in an image of a document.\\nThe document appears to be a list of shareholders for a company, likely \\\"Mines de Costano S.A.\\\" based on the prompt's context, though the image itself doesn't explicitly state the company name at the top, the prompt implies it.\\nThe output format is JSON, adhering to a specific schema.\\n\\n**Schema Analysis:**\\n- `document`: \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\" (from prompt)\\n- `page_number`: 3 (from prompt)\\n- `entries`: A list of objects, each representing a row in the table.\\n    - `number`: The row number (N\u00b0 D'ORDRE).\\n    - `name`: The name of the shareholder.\\n    - `address`: The address of the shareholder.\\n    - `actions_o`: Number of \\\"Actions de priorit\u00e9\\\" (implied by the column header \\\"ACTIONS de priorit\u00e9\\\").\\n    - `actions_p`: Number of \\\"Actions ordinaires\\\" (implied by the column header \\\"ordinaires\\\"). Wait, let's look closer at the headers.\\n        - Header: \\\"ACTIONS\\\"\\n        - Sub-headers: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" (left column under Actions) and \\\"ordinaires\\\" (right column under Actions).\\n        - So `actions_o` corresponds to \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" and `actions_p` corresponds to \\\"ordinaires\\\"? Or is it the other way around?\\n        - Let's look at the schema: `actions_o` and `actions_p`. Usually 'o' stands for 'ordinaires' and 'p' for 'privil\u00e9gi\u00e9es' or 'priorit\u00e9'.\\n        - Let's re-examine the headers.\\n        - Left sub-column: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n        - Right sub-column: \\\"ordinaires\\\".\\n        - So `actions_o` likely maps to \\\"ordinaires\\\" and `actions_p` likely maps to \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\"? Or maybe `actions_o` is \\\"Actions O...\\\" and `actions_p` is \\\"Actions P...\\\".\\n        - Let's assume standard naming: `actions_o` = ordinaires, `actions_p` = priorit\u00e9.\\n        - Wait, let's look at the \\\"REPORT\\\" row.\\n            - Left column (under \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\"): 2403.\\n            - Right column (under \\\"ordinaires\\\"): 856.\\n        - Let's look at the totals at the bottom.\\n            - \\\"A REPORTER\\\" row.\\n            - Left column total: 2,554.\\n            - Right column total: 926.\\n            - Let's check the math.\\n            - Left column entries:\\n                - 21: (blank)\\n                - 22: (blank)\\n                - 23: 150\\n                - 24: (blank)\\n                - 25: 1\\n                - 26: (blank)\\n                - 27: (blank)\\n                - 28: (blank)\\n                - 29: (blank)\\n                - 30: (blank)\\n                - Sum: 150 + 1 = 151.\\n                - Previous total (REPORT): 2403.\\n                - New total: 2403 + 151 = 2554. This matches the bottom left number \\\"2,554\\\".\\n                - So the left column is indeed the one summing to 2554. The header for the left column is \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n            - Right column entries:\\n                - 21: 2\\n                - 22: 1\\n                - 23: (blank)\\n                - 24: 10\\n                - 25: 10\\n                - 26: 1\\n                - 27: 10\\n                - 28: 32\\n                - 29: 10\\n                - 30: 1\\n                - Sum: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - Previous total (REPORT): 856.\\n                - New total: 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The bottom right number looks like \\\"926\\\" or \\\"933\\\". Let's look really closely at the bottom right. It looks like \\\"933\\\" actually, but the last digit is a bit scribbled. Or maybe \\\"926\\\". Let's re-add.\\n                - 21: 2\\n                - 22: 1\\n                - 24: 10\\n                - 25: 10\\n                - 26: 1\\n                - 27: 10\\n                - 28: 32\\n                - 29: 10\\n                - 30: 1\\n                - Total: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The handwritten number at the bottom right looks like \\\"933\\\" but the middle 3 is weird. Or maybe it's \\\"926\\\" and I misread a number.\\n                - Let's re-read row 28. \\\"32\\\". Looks like 32.\\n                - Let's re-read row 21. \\\"2\\\". Looks like 2.\\n                - Let's re-read row 22. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Let's re-read row 24. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 25. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 26. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Let's re-read row 27. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 29. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 30. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Sum: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The number at the bottom looks like \\\"933\\\" written messily. The last digit has a loop like a 3 or a 6. The middle digit looks like a 3.\\n                - Wait, let's look at the \\\"REPORT\\\" row again.\\n                - Left: 2403. Right: 856.\\n                - Bottom Left: 2,554. (2403 + 151 = 2554). Correct.\\n                - Bottom Right: Looks like \\\"933\\\" or \\\"926\\\". If it's 933, my sum is correct. If it's 926, then sum is 70. Difference is 7. Maybe row 28 is 25? No, looks like 32. Maybe row 21 is blank? No, looks like a 2.\\n                - Let's assume the sum is correct (933) and the handwriting is just messy. Or maybe the bottom number is \\\"933\\\".\\n    - `no_de_voix`: \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\". This column is empty for all rows.\\n    - `signature_present`: Boolean. True if there is a signature.\\n    - `signature`: The text of the signature.\\n\\n**Row by Row Extraction:**\\n\\n*   **Header Row:**\\n    *   N\u00b0 D'ORDRE\\n    *   NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES\\n    *   ACTIONS (de priorit\u00e9 / ordinaires)\\n    *   NOMBRE DE VOIX\\n    *   SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\\n\\n*   **REPORT Row:**\\n    *   This is a carry-over row.\\n    *   Number: (Empty/Implicitly before 21)\\n    *   Name: REPORT\\n    *   Address: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions O (Priorit\u00e9): 2403\\n    *   Actions P (Ordinaires): 856\\n    *   Wait, the schema asks for `actions_o` and `actions_p`.\\n    *   Let's check the column headers again.\\n    *   Left sub-column: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n    *   Right sub-column: \\\"ordinaires\\\".\\n    *   Usually, O = Ordinaires, P = Priorit\u00e9/Privil\u00e9gi\u00e9es.\\n    *   So `actions_o` -> Right column (ordinaires). `actions_p` -> Left column (de priorit\u00e9).\\n    *   Let's verify this mapping.\\n    *   If `actions_o` is ordinaires, then for REPORT, `actions_o` = 856.\\n    *   If `actions_p` is priorit\u00e9, then for REPORT, `actions_p` = 2403.\\n    *   Let's look at the totals at the bottom.\\n    *   Left total: 2,554. Right total: 933 (assumed).\\n    *   If `actions_p` is the left column, total_p = 2554.\\n    *   If `actions_o` is the right column, total_o = 933.\\n    *   Total voix: The column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty. But usually 1 action = 1 voice, or there's a specific rule. The column is empty, so `total_voix` might be the sum of actions or just empty. The schema has `total_voix`. The column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty in the rows. I will leave it empty or calculate if obvious. The prompt says \\\"extract metadata\\\". I should extract what is there. The column is empty.\\n    *   Wait, let's look at the bottom right number again. It looks like \\\"933\\\" but the last digit is very looped. It could be \\\"926\\\".\\n    *   Let's re-calculate: 856 + 70 = 926.\\n    *   Where could I lose 7?\\n    *   Row 28: 32. If it was 25? No, looks like 32.\\n    *   Row 21: 2. If it was blank? No, looks like a 2.\\n    *   Row 25: 10.\\n    *   Row 27: 10.\\n    *   Row 29: 10.\\n    *   Maybe row 28 is 25? \\\"32\\\" is written. The 3 is distinct.\\n    *   Maybe row 21 is not 2? It's a squiggle. Could be a checkmark? No, looks like a '2'.\\n    *   Let's assume the handwritten total is correct and I am misreading a digit.\\n    *   Or maybe the \\\"REPORT\\\" right column is 856.\\n    *   Let's look at row 23. Left column has \\\"150\\\".\\n    *   Let's look at row 25. Left column has \\\"1\\\".\\n    *   Total Left: 2403 + 150 + 1 = 2554. This is solid.\\n    *   So Left Column = Priorit\u00e9.\\n    *   Right Column = Ordinaires.\\n    *   So `actions_p` (Priorit\u00e9) = Left Column values.\\n    *   `actions_o` (Ordinaires) = Right Column values.\\n    *   This seems the most logical mapping given \\\"o\\\" and \\\"p\\\".\\n\\n*   **Row 21:**\\n    *   Number: 21\\n    *   Name: M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\n    *   Address: Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\n    *   Actions O (Ordinaires): 2\\n    *   Actions P (Priorit\u00e9): (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 22:**\\n    *   Number: 22\\n    *   Name: M.LAUMAIN Robert\\n    *   Address: 24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"? Looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". The signature in row 24 and 25 is similar. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Let's look at row 24. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 25 \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 22 \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". The first letter looks like 'A', then 'u' or 'n', then 't'. \\\"Ant\\\" is common for Antoine. \\\"Aut\\\" is less common. But looking at row 24, it looks like \\\"Ant\\\". Row 22 looks like \\\"Aut\\\". Let's transcribe what I see. \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Or maybe \\\"Avt. Pavi\\\". Let's assume it's a proxy signature \\\"Pour...\\\"? No, looks like a name. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" seems likely for Antoine Pavi. But row 22 looks like \\\"Aut\\\". Let's look at the 'n' in \\\"Lionel\\\" or \\\"Robert\\\". The 'n' is distinct. The letter in the signature looks like a 'u' or 'n'. Let's go with \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for row 22 and \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" for 24/25 if they differ, or consistent. Actually, row 24 and 25 look identical. Row 22 looks slightly different, maybe \\\"Aut\\\". Let's transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for 22 and \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" for 24/25. Wait, looking really closely at crop 2, row 22 signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Crop 4, row 24 signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Crop 5, row 25 signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Okay, I will distinguish them.\\n\\n*   **Row 23:**\\n    *   Number: 23\\n    *   Name: Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\n    *   Address: 1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES.\\n    *   Actions O: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions P: 150\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 24:**\\n    *   Number: 24\\n    *   Name: M.MASSON Daniel\\n    *   Address: 3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n*   **Row 25:**\\n    *   Number: 25\\n    *   Name: M. PANI Antonio\\n    *   Address: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: 1 (Wait, looking at row 25. Left column has a '1'. Right column has '10'.\\n    *   Let's re-examine row 25.\\n    *   Left column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a vertical mark. Looks like a '1'.\\n    *   Right column (Ordinaires): '10'.\\n    *   So Actions P = 1, Actions O = 10.\\n\\n*   **Row 26:**\\n    *   Number: 26\\n    *   Name: M. POUQUET Maurice\\n    *   Address: Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 27:**\\n    *   Number: 27\\n    *   Name: Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\n    *   Address: 195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 28:**\\n    *   Number: 28\\n    *   Name: Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\n    *   Address: 37bis Promenade des Anglais NICE (A-M)\\n    *   Actions O: 32\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 29:**\\n    *   Number: 29\\n    *   Name: Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\n    *   Address: 5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 30:**\\n    *   Number: 30\\n    *   Name: M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\n    *   Address: 34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Footer Row (A REPORTER):**\\n    *   This is a total row.\\n    *   Number: (Empty)\\n    *   Name: A REPORTER\\n    *   Address: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions O (Ordinaires - Right Col): 933 (or 926). Let's look at the handwritten total again. \\\"2,554 - 933\\\". The dash suggests subtraction? No, it's likely separating the two totals. \\\"2,554\\\" and \\\"933\\\". The second number looks like 933. The middle digit is a 3. The last digit is a 3.\\n    *   Actions P (Priorit\u00e9 - Left Col): 2,554.\\n    *   Wait, the text at the bottom is \\\"2,554 - 933\\\".\\n    *   So Total P = 2554. Total O = 933.\\n    *   Total Voix: The column is empty. I will leave it empty or null. The schema requires a string. I'll use empty string.\\n\\n**Refining the \\\"Name and Address\\\" separation:**\\nThe prompt says: \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\"\\nActually, looking at the image, Name and Address are on separate lines within the cell.\\nExample Row 21:\\nLine 1: M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\nLine 2: Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\nSo Name = \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\", Address = \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\".\\nThe prompt says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\". This might refer to a visual separator if they were on the same line, but here they are on separate lines. I will just split by newline.\\n\\\"preserve linebreaks\\\" -> This probably applies if the address itself has linebreaks.\\nExample Row 23:\\nName: Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\nAddress: 1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES. (This is on two lines in the cell? No, looks like one line wrapped or two lines. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\" then \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" on next line. I should preserve the linebreak in the address if it exists.)\\nLet's look at Row 23 address: \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\"\\nRow 26 address: \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\nRow 28 address: \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\"\\n\\n**Mapping `actions_o` and `actions_p`:**\\nSchema: `actions_o`, `actions_p`.\\nHeaders: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" (Left), \\\"ordinaires\\\" (Right).\\nStandard convention: O = Ordinaires, P = Priorit\u00e9.\\nSo `actions_o` = Right Column. `actions_p` = Left Column.\\n\\n**Total Actions:**\\n`total_o`: Sum of `actions_o` column (Right). Value at bottom: 933.\\n`total_p`: Sum of `actions_p` column (Left). Value at bottom: 2,554.\\n`total_voix`: Column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty. I will output empty string.\\n\\n**Signatures:**\\nRow 22: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" (or similar).\\nRow 24: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check the bottom total text again.**\\n\\\"A REPORTER\\\"\\nBelow the columns: \\\"2,554 - 933\\\".\\nThe dash is likely a separator.\\nSo `total_p` = \\\"2,554\\\". `total_o` = \\\"933\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check Row 25 again.**\\nLeft column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a faint '1'.\\nRight column (Ordinaires): '10'.\\nSo `actions_p` = \\\"1\\\", `actions_o` = \\\"10\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check Row 21 again.**\\nRight column: '2'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 23 again.**\\nLeft column: '150'.\\nRight column: Empty.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 28 again.**\\nRight column: '32'.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 30 again.**\\nRight column: '1'.\\n\\n**Final check on \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\".**\\nIn Row 21, \\\"MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\" has a dash. This is part of the address. Preserve it.\\nThe instruction likely means if there was a dash *separating* the name field from the address field (like \\\"Name - Address\\\"), remove it. Here they are on separate lines, so no separator dash to remove.\\n\\n**Constructing the JSON:**\\n\\nDocument: \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\"\\nPage: 3\\n\\nEntries:\\n1.  **21**:\\n    *   number: \\\"21\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"2\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n2.  **22**:\\n    *   number: \\\"22\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" (Looking really closely at crop 2, the first letter is A, second is u/n, third is t. \\\"Aut\\\" or \\\"Ant\\\". Given \\\"Ant\\\" in other rows, maybe it's \\\"Ant\\\" written fast. But the loop looks like a 'u'. I'll transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" to be safe, or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" if I assume consistency. The prompt asks to extract. I see \\\"Aut\\\". Wait, looking at row 24, the 'n' is distinct. In row 22, it looks like a 'u'. I will write \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\".) Actually, looking at row 24 and 25, the signature is clearly \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 22 looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". I will stick to what I see.\\n\\n3.  **23**:\\n    *   number: \\\"23\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES.\\\" (Note: \\\"IXELLES-\\\" is on one line, \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" on next. I should preserve linebreak. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\")\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"150\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n4.  **24**:\\n    *   number: \\\"24\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n5.  **25**:\\n    *   number: \\\"25\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n6.  **26**:\\n    *   number: \\\"26\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n7.  **27**:\\n    *   number: \\\"27\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n8.  **28**:\\n    *   number: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"32\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n9.  **29**:\\n    *   number: \\\"29\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n10. **30**:\\n    *   number: \\\"30\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n**Total Actions:**\\n*   total_o: \\\"933\\\" (Based on visual inspection of \\\"933\\\" and sum calculation 856+77=933).\\n*   total_p: \\\"2,554\\\"\\n*   total_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nOne detail: Row 23 address. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\" and \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" are on separate lines.\\nOne detail: Row 26 address. \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\" and \\\"d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\" are on separate lines.\\nOne detail: Row 28 address. \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\" and \\\"NICE (A-M)\\\" are on separate lines.\\n\\nI need to make sure I handle the \\\"REPORT\\\" row. The schema asks for \\\"entries\\\". The \\\"REPORT\\\" row is technically an entry in the table structure, carrying over totals.\\nShould I include it?\\nThe prompt says \\\"extract the metadata\\\". Usually, this implies the data rows. The \\\"REPORT\\\" row is a summary of previous pages.\\nHowever, it is a row in the table.\\nLet's look at the \\\"entries\\\" definition. It has \\\"number\\\". The REPORT row has no number.\\nI will exclude the \\\"REPORT\\\" row from the `entries` list because it doesn't have a sequence number like the others (21-30). It's a header/carry-over.\\nWait, looking at the image, \\\"REPORT\\\" is written in the Name column.\\nIf I include it:\\nnumber: \\\"\\\"\\nname: \\\"REPORT\\\"\\naddress: \\\"\\\"\\nactions_o: \\\"856\\\"\\nactions_p: \\\"2403\\\"\\n...\\nThe prompt asks to extract entries. Usually, this means the numbered items. I will stick to items 21-30.\\n\\nWait, looking at the totals at the bottom \\\"A REPORTER\\\". This is the new total to be carried to the next page.\\nThe \\\"REPORT\\\" at the top is the total from the previous page.\\nI will extract rows 21 through 30.\\n\\nOne final check on signatures.\\nRow 22: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" vs \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 24: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nThe signature in 22 looks slightly different. The middle letter is very rounded, like a 'u'. \\\"Aut\\\".\\nThe signature in 24/25 has a sharper 'n'. \\\"Ant\\\".\\nI will transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for 22.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 25 actions.\\nLeft column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a vertical stroke. It aligns with the '1' in '150' above and '10' below (wait, 10 is in right column).\\nLet's look at the columns again.\\nRow 23: Left '150'.\\nRow 24: Right '10'.\\nRow 25: Left '1', Right '10'.\\nYes, Row 25 has entries in both columns.\\nLeft: 1. Right: 10.\\nSo `actions_p` = \\\"1\\\", `actions_o` = \\\"10\\\".\\n\\nOne final check on Row 21 actions.\\nRight column: '2'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 26 actions.\\nRight column: '1'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 30 actions.\\nRight column: '1'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOkay, I'm ready.\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\",\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 3,\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"21\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"22\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"23\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"150\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"24\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"25\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"26\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"27\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"28\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"32\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"29\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"30\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"933\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2,554\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\nWait, I should check the total_o value again.\\nThe handwritten number is \\\"2,554 - 933\\\" (or 926).\\nIf I sum the visible numbers:\\nRight column (Ordinaires):\\nReport: 856\\n21: 2\\n22: 1\\n24: 10\\n25: 10\\n26: 1\\n27: 10\\n28: 32\\n29: 10\\n30: 1\\nSum of new entries: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\nTotal: 856 + 77 = 933.\\nSo \\\"933\\\" is the mathematically correct sum. The handwriting looks like 933 (the last 3 is just looped). I will use \\\"933\\\".\\n\\nOne small detail: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\". There is a space after M. ? \\\"M.de\\\". It looks like \\\"M.de\\\". I will transcribe as seen.\\n\\\"M.LAUMAIN\\\". No space.\\n\\\"Suc.IHOEST\\\". No space.\\n\\\"M.MASSON\\\". No space.\\n\\\"M. PANI\\\". Space.\\n\\\"M. POUQUET\\\". Space.\\n\\\"Mme RAOULT\\\". Space.\\n\\\"Suc.RICHOMME\\\". No space.\\n\\\"Mme SAVAEY\\\". Space.\\n\\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY\\\". Space.\\n\\nI will try to be faithful to the spacing in the image.\\nRow 21: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.de la\\\".\\nRow 22: \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.LAUMAIN\\\".\\nRow 23: \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Suc.IHOEST\\\".\\nRow 24: \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.MASSON\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. PANI\\\".\\nRow 26: \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. POUQUET\\\".\\nRow 27: \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Mme RAOULT\\\".\\nRow 28: \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Suc.RICHOMME\\\".\\nRow 29: \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Mme SAVAEY\\\".\\nRow 30: \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY\\\".\\n\\nThe prompt says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\".\\nIn row 23, \\\"IXELLES-BRUXELLES\\\" has a dash. This is inside the address.\\nIn row 24, \\\"(S-et-O)\\\" has dashes. Inside address.\\nIn row 28, \\\"(A-M)\\\" has a dash. Inside address.\\nThe instruction likely refers to a separator like \\\"Name - Address\\\". Since they are on new lines, there are no such dashes.\\n\\nFinal check on Row 25 signature.\\nIt looks like \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Same as row 24.\\nFinal check on Row 22 signature.\\nIt looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". The 'u' is quite distinct compared to the 'n' in row 24. I'll stick with \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\".\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"no_de_voix\\\". The column is \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\". It is empty for all rows.\\nThe totals row has \\\"total_voix\\\". I will leave it empty.\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"actions_o\\\" and \\\"actions_p\\\".\\nI've mapped:\\nactions_o (Ordinaires) -> Right Column.\\nactions_p (Priorit\u00e9) -> Left Column.\\nThis is consistent with \\\"o\\\" and \\\"p\\\" and the headers.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 23 address linebreak.\\n\\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\"\\n\\\"BRUXELLES.\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 26 address linebreak.\\n\\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\"\\n\\\"d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 28 address linebreak.\\n\\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\"\\n\\\"NICE (A-M)\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nThe \\\"REPORT\\\" row at the top.\\nI will not include it in `entries` as it has no number and is a carry-over.\\nThe \\\"A REPORTER\\\" row at the bottom.\\nI will not include it in `entries`. I will use its values for `total_actions`.\\n\\nThe values for `total_actions`:\\ntotal_o: \\\"933\\\"\\ntotal_p: \\\"2,554\\\"\\ntotal_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nLooks good.\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"The user wants me to extract data from a table in an image of a document.\\nThe document appears to be a list of shareholders for a company, likely \\\"Mines de Costano S.A.\\\" based on the prompt's context, though the image itself doesn't explicitly state the company name at the top, the prompt implies it.\\nThe output format is JSON, adhering to a specific schema.\\n\\n**Schema Analysis:**\\n- `document`: \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\" (from prompt)\\n- `page_number`: 3 (from prompt)\\n- `entries`: A list of objects, each representing a row in the table.\\n    - `number`: The row number (N\u00b0 D'ORDRE).\\n    - `name`: The name of the shareholder.\\n    - `address`: The address of the shareholder.\\n    - `actions_o`: Number of \\\"Actions de priorit\u00e9\\\" (implied by the column header \\\"ACTIONS de priorit\u00e9\\\").\\n    - `actions_p`: Number of \\\"Actions ordinaires\\\" (implied by the column header \\\"ordinaires\\\"). Wait, let's look closer at the headers.\\n        - Header: \\\"ACTIONS\\\"\\n        - Sub-headers: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" (left column under Actions) and \\\"ordinaires\\\" (right column under Actions).\\n        - So `actions_o` corresponds to \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" and `actions_p` corresponds to \\\"ordinaires\\\"? Or is it the other way around?\\n        - Let's look at the schema: `actions_o` and `actions_p`. Usually 'o' stands for 'ordinaires' and 'p' for 'privil\u00e9gi\u00e9es' or 'priorit\u00e9'.\\n        - Let's re-examine the headers.\\n        - Left sub-column: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n        - Right sub-column: \\\"ordinaires\\\".\\n        - So `actions_o` likely maps to \\\"ordinaires\\\" and `actions_p` likely maps to \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\"? Or maybe `actions_o` is \\\"Actions O...\\\" and `actions_p` is \\\"Actions P...\\\".\\n        - Let's assume standard naming: `actions_o` = ordinaires, `actions_p` = priorit\u00e9.\\n        - Wait, let's look at the \\\"REPORT\\\" row.\\n            - Left column (under \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\"): 2403.\\n            - Right column (under \\\"ordinaires\\\"): 856.\\n        - Let's look at the totals at the bottom.\\n            - \\\"A REPORTER\\\" row.\\n            - Left column total: 2,554.\\n            - Right column total: 926.\\n            - Let's check the math.\\n            - Left column entries:\\n                - 21: (blank)\\n                - 22: (blank)\\n                - 23: 150\\n                - 24: (blank)\\n                - 25: 1\\n                - 26: (blank)\\n                - 27: (blank)\\n                - 28: (blank)\\n                - 29: (blank)\\n                - 30: (blank)\\n                - Sum: 150 + 1 = 151.\\n                - Previous total (REPORT): 2403.\\n                - New total: 2403 + 151 = 2554. This matches the bottom left number \\\"2,554\\\".\\n                - So the left column is indeed the one summing to 2554. The header for the left column is \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n            - Right column entries:\\n                - 21: 2\\n                - 22: 1\\n                - 23: (blank)\\n                - 24: 10\\n                - 25: 10\\n                - 26: 1\\n                - 27: 10\\n                - 28: 32\\n                - 29: 10\\n                - 30: 1\\n                - Sum: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - Previous total (REPORT): 856.\\n                - New total: 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The bottom right number looks like \\\"926\\\" or \\\"933\\\". Let's look really closely at the bottom right. It looks like \\\"933\\\" actually, but the last digit is a bit scribbled. Or maybe \\\"926\\\". Let's re-add.\\n                - 21: 2\\n                - 22: 1\\n                - 24: 10\\n                - 25: 10\\n                - 26: 1\\n                - 27: 10\\n                - 28: 32\\n                - 29: 10\\n                - 30: 1\\n                - Total: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The handwritten number at the bottom right looks like \\\"933\\\" but the middle 3 is weird. Or maybe it's \\\"926\\\" and I misread a number.\\n                - Let's re-read row 28. \\\"32\\\". Looks like 32.\\n                - Let's re-read row 21. \\\"2\\\". Looks like 2.\\n                - Let's re-read row 22. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Let's re-read row 24. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 25. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 26. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Let's re-read row 27. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 29. \\\"10\\\". Looks like 10.\\n                - Let's re-read row 30. \\\"1\\\". Looks like 1.\\n                - Sum: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\n                - 856 + 77 = 933.\\n                - The number at the bottom looks like \\\"933\\\" written messily. The last digit has a loop like a 3 or a 6. The middle digit looks like a 3.\\n                - Wait, let's look at the \\\"REPORT\\\" row again.\\n                - Left: 2403. Right: 856.\\n                - Bottom Left: 2,554. (2403 + 151 = 2554). Correct.\\n                - Bottom Right: Looks like \\\"933\\\" or \\\"926\\\". If it's 933, my sum is correct. If it's 926, then sum is 70. Difference is 7. Maybe row 28 is 25? No, looks like 32. Maybe row 21 is blank? No, looks like a 2.\\n                - Let's assume the sum is correct (933) and the handwriting is just messy. Or maybe the bottom number is \\\"933\\\".\\n    - `no_de_voix`: \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\". This column is empty for all rows.\\n    - `signature_present`: Boolean. True if there is a signature.\\n    - `signature`: The text of the signature.\\n\\n**Row by Row Extraction:**\\n\\n*   **Header Row:**\\n    *   N\u00b0 D'ORDRE\\n    *   NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES\\n    *   ACTIONS (de priorit\u00e9 / ordinaires)\\n    *   NOMBRE DE VOIX\\n    *   SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\\n\\n*   **REPORT Row:**\\n    *   This is a carry-over row.\\n    *   Number: (Empty/Implicitly before 21)\\n    *   Name: REPORT\\n    *   Address: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions O (Priorit\u00e9): 2403\\n    *   Actions P (Ordinaires): 856\\n    *   Wait, the schema asks for `actions_o` and `actions_p`.\\n    *   Let's check the column headers again.\\n    *   Left sub-column: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\".\\n    *   Right sub-column: \\\"ordinaires\\\".\\n    *   Usually, O = Ordinaires, P = Priorit\u00e9/Privil\u00e9gi\u00e9es.\\n    *   So `actions_o` -> Right column (ordinaires). `actions_p` -> Left column (de priorit\u00e9).\\n    *   Let's verify this mapping.\\n    *   If `actions_o` is ordinaires, then for REPORT, `actions_o` = 856.\\n    *   If `actions_p` is priorit\u00e9, then for REPORT, `actions_p` = 2403.\\n    *   Let's look at the totals at the bottom.\\n    *   Left total: 2,554. Right total: 933 (assumed).\\n    *   If `actions_p` is the left column, total_p = 2554.\\n    *   If `actions_o` is the right column, total_o = 933.\\n    *   Total voix: The column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty. But usually 1 action = 1 voice, or there's a specific rule. The column is empty, so `total_voix` might be the sum of actions or just empty. The schema has `total_voix`. The column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty in the rows. I will leave it empty or calculate if obvious. The prompt says \\\"extract metadata\\\". I should extract what is there. The column is empty.\\n    *   Wait, let's look at the bottom right number again. It looks like \\\"933\\\" but the last digit is very looped. It could be \\\"926\\\".\\n    *   Let's re-calculate: 856 + 70 = 926.\\n    *   Where could I lose 7?\\n    *   Row 28: 32. If it was 25? No, looks like 32.\\n    *   Row 21: 2. If it was blank? No, looks like a 2.\\n    *   Row 25: 10.\\n    *   Row 27: 10.\\n    *   Row 29: 10.\\n    *   Maybe row 28 is 25? \\\"32\\\" is written. The 3 is distinct.\\n    *   Maybe row 21 is not 2? It's a squiggle. Could be a checkmark? No, looks like a '2'.\\n    *   Let's assume the handwritten total is correct and I am misreading a digit.\\n    *   Or maybe the \\\"REPORT\\\" right column is 856.\\n    *   Let's look at row 23. Left column has \\\"150\\\".\\n    *   Let's look at row 25. Left column has \\\"1\\\".\\n    *   Total Left: 2403 + 150 + 1 = 2554. This is solid.\\n    *   So Left Column = Priorit\u00e9.\\n    *   Right Column = Ordinaires.\\n    *   So `actions_p` (Priorit\u00e9) = Left Column values.\\n    *   `actions_o` (Ordinaires) = Right Column values.\\n    *   This seems the most logical mapping given \\\"o\\\" and \\\"p\\\".\\n\\n*   **Row 21:**\\n    *   Number: 21\\n    *   Name: M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\n    *   Address: Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\n    *   Actions O (Ordinaires): 2\\n    *   Actions P (Priorit\u00e9): (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 22:**\\n    *   Number: 22\\n    *   Name: M.LAUMAIN Robert\\n    *   Address: 24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"? Looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". The signature in row 24 and 25 is similar. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" or \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Let's look at row 24. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 25 \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 22 \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". The first letter looks like 'A', then 'u' or 'n', then 't'. \\\"Ant\\\" is common for Antoine. \\\"Aut\\\" is less common. But looking at row 24, it looks like \\\"Ant\\\". Row 22 looks like \\\"Aut\\\". Let's transcribe what I see. \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Or maybe \\\"Avt. Pavi\\\". Let's assume it's a proxy signature \\\"Pour...\\\"? No, looks like a name. \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" seems likely for Antoine Pavi. But row 22 looks like \\\"Aut\\\". Let's look at the 'n' in \\\"Lionel\\\" or \\\"Robert\\\". The 'n' is distinct. The letter in the signature looks like a 'u' or 'n'. Let's go with \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for row 22 and \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" for 24/25 if they differ, or consistent. Actually, row 24 and 25 look identical. Row 22 looks slightly different, maybe \\\"Aut\\\". Let's transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for 22 and \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" for 24/25. Wait, looking really closely at crop 2, row 22 signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". Crop 4, row 24 signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Crop 5, row 25 signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Okay, I will distinguish them.\\n\\n*   **Row 23:**\\n    *   Number: 23\\n    *   Name: Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\n    *   Address: 1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES.\\n    *   Actions O: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions P: 150\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 24:**\\n    *   Number: 24\\n    *   Name: M.MASSON Daniel\\n    *   Address: 3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n*   **Row 25:**\\n    *   Number: 25\\n    *   Name: M. PANI Antonio\\n    *   Address: SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: 1 (Wait, looking at row 25. Left column has a '1'. Right column has '10'.\\n    *   Let's re-examine row 25.\\n    *   Left column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a vertical mark. Looks like a '1'.\\n    *   Right column (Ordinaires): '10'.\\n    *   So Actions P = 1, Actions O = 10.\\n\\n*   **Row 26:**\\n    *   Number: 26\\n    *   Name: M. POUQUET Maurice\\n    *   Address: Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 27:**\\n    *   Number: 27\\n    *   Name: Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\n    *   Address: 195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 28:**\\n    *   Number: 28\\n    *   Name: Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\n    *   Address: 37bis Promenade des Anglais NICE (A-M)\\n    *   Actions O: 32\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 29:**\\n    *   Number: 29\\n    *   Name: Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\n    *   Address: 5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\n    *   Actions O: 10\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Row 30:**\\n    *   Number: 30\\n    *   Name: M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\n    *   Address: 34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\n    *   Actions O: 1\\n    *   Actions P: (Empty)\\n    *   Signature: (Empty)\\n\\n*   **Footer Row (A REPORTER):**\\n    *   This is a total row.\\n    *   Number: (Empty)\\n    *   Name: A REPORTER\\n    *   Address: (Empty)\\n    *   Actions O (Ordinaires - Right Col): 933 (or 926). Let's look at the handwritten total again. \\\"2,554 - 933\\\". The dash suggests subtraction? No, it's likely separating the two totals. \\\"2,554\\\" and \\\"933\\\". The second number looks like 933. The middle digit is a 3. The last digit is a 3.\\n    *   Actions P (Priorit\u00e9 - Left Col): 2,554.\\n    *   Wait, the text at the bottom is \\\"2,554 - 933\\\".\\n    *   So Total P = 2554. Total O = 933.\\n    *   Total Voix: The column is empty. I will leave it empty or null. The schema requires a string. I'll use empty string.\\n\\n**Refining the \\\"Name and Address\\\" separation:**\\nThe prompt says: \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\"\\nActually, looking at the image, Name and Address are on separate lines within the cell.\\nExample Row 21:\\nLine 1: M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\nLine 2: Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\nSo Name = \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\", Address = \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\".\\nThe prompt says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\". This might refer to a visual separator if they were on the same line, but here they are on separate lines. I will just split by newline.\\n\\\"preserve linebreaks\\\" -> This probably applies if the address itself has linebreaks.\\nExample Row 23:\\nName: Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\nAddress: 1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES. (This is on two lines in the cell? No, looks like one line wrapped or two lines. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\" then \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" on next line. I should preserve the linebreak in the address if it exists.)\\nLet's look at Row 23 address: \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\"\\nRow 26 address: \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\nRow 28 address: \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\"\\n\\n**Mapping `actions_o` and `actions_p`:**\\nSchema: `actions_o`, `actions_p`.\\nHeaders: \\\"de priorit\u00e9\\\" (Left), \\\"ordinaires\\\" (Right).\\nStandard convention: O = Ordinaires, P = Priorit\u00e9.\\nSo `actions_o` = Right Column. `actions_p` = Left Column.\\n\\n**Total Actions:**\\n`total_o`: Sum of `actions_o` column (Right). Value at bottom: 933.\\n`total_p`: Sum of `actions_p` column (Left). Value at bottom: 2,554.\\n`total_voix`: Column \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\" is empty. I will output empty string.\\n\\n**Signatures:**\\nRow 22: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" (or similar).\\nRow 24: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check the bottom total text again.**\\n\\\"A REPORTER\\\"\\nBelow the columns: \\\"2,554 - 933\\\".\\nThe dash is likely a separator.\\nSo `total_p` = \\\"2,554\\\". `total_o` = \\\"933\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check Row 25 again.**\\nLeft column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a faint '1'.\\nRight column (Ordinaires): '10'.\\nSo `actions_p` = \\\"1\\\", `actions_o` = \\\"10\\\".\\n\\n**Let's check Row 21 again.**\\nRight column: '2'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 23 again.**\\nLeft column: '150'.\\nRight column: Empty.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 28 again.**\\nRight column: '32'.\\n\\n**Let's check Row 30 again.**\\nRight column: '1'.\\n\\n**Final check on \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\".**\\nIn Row 21, \\\"MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\" has a dash. This is part of the address. Preserve it.\\nThe instruction likely means if there was a dash *separating* the name field from the address field (like \\\"Name - Address\\\"), remove it. Here they are on separate lines, so no separator dash to remove.\\n\\n**Constructing the JSON:**\\n\\nDocument: \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\"\\nPage: 3\\n\\nEntries:\\n1.  **21**:\\n    *   number: \\\"21\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"2\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n2.  **22**:\\n    *   number: \\\"22\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" (Looking really closely at crop 2, the first letter is A, second is u/n, third is t. \\\"Aut\\\" or \\\"Ant\\\". Given \\\"Ant\\\" in other rows, maybe it's \\\"Ant\\\" written fast. But the loop looks like a 'u'. I'll transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" to be safe, or \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\" if I assume consistency. The prompt asks to extract. I see \\\"Aut\\\". Wait, looking at row 24, the 'n' is distinct. In row 22, it looks like a 'u'. I will write \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\".) Actually, looking at row 24 and 25, the signature is clearly \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Row 22 looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". I will stick to what I see.\\n\\n3.  **23**:\\n    *   number: \\\"23\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-BRUXELLES.\\\" (Note: \\\"IXELLES-\\\" is on one line, \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" on next. I should preserve linebreak. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\")\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"150\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n4.  **24**:\\n    *   number: \\\"24\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n5.  **25**:\\n    *   number: \\\"25\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: true\\n    *   signature: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n\\n6.  **26**:\\n    *   number: \\\"26\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n7.  **27**:\\n    *   number: \\\"27\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n8.  **28**:\\n    *   number: \\\"28\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"32\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n9.  **29**:\\n    *   number: \\\"29\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"10\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n10. **30**:\\n    *   number: \\\"30\\\"\\n    *   name: \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\"\\n    *   address: \\\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\\"\\n    *   actions_o: \\\"1\\\"\\n    *   actions_p: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   no_de_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n    *   signature_present: false\\n    *   signature: \\\"\\\"\\n\\n**Total Actions:**\\n*   total_o: \\\"933\\\" (Based on visual inspection of \\\"933\\\" and sum calculation 856+77=933).\\n*   total_p: \\\"2,554\\\"\\n*   total_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nOne detail: Row 23 address. \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\" and \\\"BRUXELLES.\\\" are on separate lines.\\nOne detail: Row 26 address. \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\" and \\\"d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\" are on separate lines.\\nOne detail: Row 28 address. \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\" and \\\"NICE (A-M)\\\" are on separate lines.\\n\\nI need to make sure I handle the \\\"REPORT\\\" row. The schema asks for \\\"entries\\\". The \\\"REPORT\\\" row is technically an entry in the table structure, carrying over totals.\\nShould I include it?\\nThe prompt says \\\"extract the metadata\\\". Usually, this implies the data rows. The \\\"REPORT\\\" row is a summary of previous pages.\\nHowever, it is a row in the table.\\nLet's look at the \\\"entries\\\" definition. It has \\\"number\\\". The REPORT row has no number.\\nI will exclude the \\\"REPORT\\\" row from the `entries` list because it doesn't have a sequence number like the others (21-30). It's a header/carry-over.\\nWait, looking at the image, \\\"REPORT\\\" is written in the Name column.\\nIf I include it:\\nnumber: \\\"\\\"\\nname: \\\"REPORT\\\"\\naddress: \\\"\\\"\\nactions_o: \\\"856\\\"\\nactions_p: \\\"2403\\\"\\n...\\nThe prompt asks to extract entries. Usually, this means the numbered items. I will stick to items 21-30.\\n\\nWait, looking at the totals at the bottom \\\"A REPORTER\\\". This is the new total to be carried to the next page.\\nThe \\\"REPORT\\\" at the top is the total from the previous page.\\nI will extract rows 21 through 30.\\n\\nOne final check on signatures.\\nRow 22: \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" vs \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 24: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\".\\nThe signature in 22 looks slightly different. The middle letter is very rounded, like a 'u'. \\\"Aut\\\".\\nThe signature in 24/25 has a sharper 'n'. \\\"Ant\\\".\\nI will transcribe \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\" for 22.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 25 actions.\\nLeft column (Priorit\u00e9): There is a vertical stroke. It aligns with the '1' in '150' above and '10' below (wait, 10 is in right column).\\nLet's look at the columns again.\\nRow 23: Left '150'.\\nRow 24: Right '10'.\\nRow 25: Left '1', Right '10'.\\nYes, Row 25 has entries in both columns.\\nLeft: 1. Right: 10.\\nSo `actions_p` = \\\"1\\\", `actions_o` = \\\"10\\\".\\n\\nOne final check on Row 21 actions.\\nRight column: '2'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 26 actions.\\nRight column: '1'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOne final check on Row 30 actions.\\nRight column: '1'.\\nLeft column: Empty.\\n\\nOkay, I'm ready.\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_23_Assembl\u00e9e_1951_Generalversammlung1_page_3\\\",\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 3,\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"21\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Bo\u00eete postale 41 \u00e0 MARRAKECH-MEDINA\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"22\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"24 Avenue Gambetta MONTROUGE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"23\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\\nBRUXELLES.\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"150\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"24\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"3, Av.Gaug\u00e9 VIROFLAY (S-et-O)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"25\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": true,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"26\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\\nd'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"27\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"195 rue de Grenelle PARIS\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"28\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\\nNICE (A-M)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"32\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"29\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"5, Avenue Weber GENEVE (Suisse)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"30\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"34, Bd Marbeau PARIS (16\u00b0)\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"933\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2,554\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\nWait, I should check the total_o value again.\\nThe handwritten number is \\\"2,554 - 933\\\" (or 926).\\nIf I sum the visible numbers:\\nRight column (Ordinaires):\\nReport: 856\\n21: 2\\n22: 1\\n24: 10\\n25: 10\\n26: 1\\n27: 10\\n28: 32\\n29: 10\\n30: 1\\nSum of new entries: 2+1+10+10+1+10+32+10+1 = 77.\\nTotal: 856 + 77 = 933.\\nSo \\\"933\\\" is the mathematically correct sum. The handwriting looks like 933 (the last 3 is just looped). I will use \\\"933\\\".\\n\\nOne small detail: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\". There is a space after M. ? \\\"M.de\\\". It looks like \\\"M.de\\\". I will transcribe as seen.\\n\\\"M.LAUMAIN\\\". No space.\\n\\\"Suc.IHOEST\\\". No space.\\n\\\"M.MASSON\\\". No space.\\n\\\"M. PANI\\\". Space.\\n\\\"M. POUQUET\\\". Space.\\n\\\"Mme RAOULT\\\". Space.\\n\\\"Suc.RICHOMME\\\". No space.\\n\\\"Mme SAVAEY\\\". Space.\\n\\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY\\\". Space.\\n\\nI will try to be faithful to the spacing in the image.\\nRow 21: \\\"M.de la FONTAINE Lionel\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.de la\\\".\\nRow 22: \\\"M.LAUMAIN Robert\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.LAUMAIN\\\".\\nRow 23: \\\"Suc.IHOEST Paul (Mme)\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Suc.IHOEST\\\".\\nRow 24: \\\"M.MASSON Daniel\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M.MASSON\\\".\\nRow 25: \\\"M. PANI Antonio\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. PANI\\\".\\nRow 26: \\\"M. POUQUET Maurice\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. POUQUET\\\".\\nRow 27: \\\"Mme RAOULT Suzanne\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Mme RAOULT\\\".\\nRow 28: \\\"Suc.RICHOMME de POSSON (Mme)\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Suc.RICHOMME\\\".\\nRow 29: \\\"Mme SAVAEY M.L.\\\" -> Looks like \\\"Mme SAVAEY\\\".\\nRow 30: \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY Philippe\\\" -> Looks like \\\"M. SCHERESCHWESKY\\\".\\n\\nThe prompt says \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address\\\".\\nIn row 23, \\\"IXELLES-BRUXELLES\\\" has a dash. This is inside the address.\\nIn row 24, \\\"(S-et-O)\\\" has dashes. Inside address.\\nIn row 28, \\\"(A-M)\\\" has a dash. Inside address.\\nThe instruction likely refers to a separator like \\\"Name - Address\\\". Since they are on new lines, there are no such dashes.\\n\\nFinal check on Row 25 signature.\\nIt looks like \\\"Ant. Pavi\\\". Same as row 24.\\nFinal check on Row 22 signature.\\nIt looks like \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\". The 'u' is quite distinct compared to the 'n' in row 24. I'll stick with \\\"Aut. Pavi\\\".\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"no_de_voix\\\". The column is \\\"NOMBRE DE VOIX\\\". It is empty for all rows.\\nThe totals row has \\\"total_voix\\\". I will leave it empty.\\n\\nOne detail: \\\"actions_o\\\" and \\\"actions_p\\\".\\nI've mapped:\\nactions_o (Ordinaires) -> Right Column.\\nactions_p (Priorit\u00e9) -> Left Column.\\nThis is consistent with \\\"o\\\" and \\\"p\\\" and the headers.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 23 address linebreak.\\n\\\"1, rue J.B.Colyns IXELLES-\\\"\\n\\\"BRUXELLES.\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 26 address linebreak.\\n\\\"Essendi\u00e8ras, par St M\u00e9dard\\\"\\n\\\"d'Excisuil (Dordogne)\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nOne detail: Row 28 address linebreak.\\n\\\"37bis Promenade des Anglais\\\"\\n\\\"NICE (A-M)\\\"\\nI will include the newline character.\\n\\nThe \\\"REPORT\\\" row at the top.\\nI will not include it in `entries` as it has no number and is a carry-over.\\nThe \\\"A REPORTER\\\" row at the bottom.\\nI will not include it in `entries`. I will use its values for `total_actions`.\\n\\nThe values for `total_actions`:\\ntotal_o: \\\"933\\\"\\ntotal_p: \\\"2,554\\\"\\ntotal_voix: \\\"\\\"\\n\\nLooks good.\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1783072121,\"model\":\"qwen/qwen3.6-plus-04-02\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":null,\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":10205,\"prompt_tokens\":3122,\"total_tokens\":13327,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":9215,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":0,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.0209144,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.0209144,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.00101465,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.01989975}},\"provider\":\"Alibaba\"}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.8832671169865374, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 28004, "total_output_tokens": 59884, "total_tokens": 87888, "input_cost_usd": 0.009101300000000001, "output_cost_usd": 0.1167738, "total_cost_usd": 0.12587510000000002}}, "normalized_score": 88.32671169865374}