{"_id": {"$oid": "6a671d25338dadb0be4e84bd"}, "test_id": "T1397", "benchmark": "blacklist_cards", "date": "2026-07-25", "tags": {"document-type": ["index-card"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["de"], "entry-type": ["company"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["lea_kasper", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k3", "dataclass": "Card", "temperature": 0.5, "role_description": "You are a Historian", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "You are a meticulous archivist extracting data from an index card image. Analyze the provided image and extract the following information. Return the data ONLY as a valid JSON object.\n\n- \"company\": The primary company name, usually in the top-left. Exclude the location.\n- \"location\": The city or town, often following the company name.\n- \"b_id\": The identifier code, usually in the top-right, starting with \"B.\".\n- \"date\": Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string.\n- \"information\": A list of text blocks from the main body of the card. Each block should be a separate string in the list. Maintain line breaks with \\\\n.\n\nHere is the required JSON format:\n{\n  \"company\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"location\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"b_id\": {\"transcription\": \"\"},\n  \"date\": \"\",\n  \"information\": [\n    {\"transcription\": \"\"}\n  ]\n}\n\nIf you cannot find a value for a field, leave its transcription value as an empty string. Do not add any explanatory text outside of the JSON object.", "results": {"text": "{\"company\":{\"transcription\":\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\"},\"location\":{\"transcription\":\"CARACAS\"},\"b_id\":{\"transcription\":\"B.51.322.GB.384.\"},\"date\":\"\",\"information\":[{\"transcription\":\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\"},{\"transcription\":\"gestrichen:\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\"}]}", "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k3", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 3725, "output_tokens": 2021, "total_tokens": 5746, "input_cost_usd": 0.011175000000000001, "output_cost_usd": 0.030314999999999998, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.04149}, "duration": 66.43367314338684, "timestamp": "2026-07-25T21:24:34.266717", "parsed": {"company": {"transcription": "H\u00e4uselmann Carlos"}, "location": {"transcription": "CARACAS"}, "b_id": {"transcription": "B.51.322.GB.384."}, "date": "", "information": [{"transcription": "Britische schwarze Liste\nAmendment 9, 1940."}, {"transcription": "gestrichen:\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)"}]}, "conversation_id": "61c5ce99-d6bc-460f-817d-494639e81431", "score": {"fuzzy": 1.0}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1785007412-OkwedexOu4pRywLIVgbN\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n  \\\"company\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\"},\\n  \\\"location\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"CARACAS\\\"},\\n  \\\"b_id\\\": {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\"},\\n  \\\"date\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n  \\\"information\\\": [\\n    {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"},\\n    {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"}\\n  ]\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"parsed\":{\"company\":{\"transcription\":\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\"},\"location\":{\"transcription\":\"CARACAS\"},\"b_id\":{\"transcription\":\"B.51.322.GB.384.\"},\"date\":\"\",\"information\":[{\"transcription\":\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\"},{\"transcription\":\"gestrichen:\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\"}]},\"reasoning\":\"The user wants me to extract data from an index card image. Let me analyze it carefully.\\n\\nTop-left: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos, CARACAS\\\"\\n- Company: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" (exclude location)\\n- Location: \\\"CARACAS\\\"\\n\\nTop-right: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\"\\n\\nMain body:\\n\\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n\\n\\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\n\\n\\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nDate: There's a date in the body \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" but the instructions say \\\"Any stamped dates on the card\\\". I don't see a stamped date. The \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" is typed in the body, not stamped. So date should be empty string. Let me reconsider - the instruction says \\\"Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string.\\\" There's no stamped date visible. So date = \\\"\\\".\\n\\nInformation blocks: The main body text. Each block separate string. Let me think about how to split. \\n\\nBlock 1: \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\nBlock 2: \\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\nBlock 3: \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nOr maybe block 2 and 3 together? \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is a heading, then the amendment line. The instruction says \\\"A list of text blocks from the main body of the card. Each block should be a separate string in the list. Maintain line breaks with \\\\n.\\\"\\n\\nLooking at the layout, there seem to be distinct blocks:\\n1. \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n2. \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nHmm, but \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is underlined and on its own line, with the amendment below. They could be one block or separate. The spacing: there's a blank line between \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" and \\\"gestrichen:\\\". Then \\\"gestrichen:\\\" and \\\"Amendment 14...\\\" are close together. So maybe:\\n\\ninformation: [\\n  {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"},\\n  {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"}\\n]\\n\\nActually, looking more carefully, \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is underlined and appears to be a label for what follows. I'll group it with the line below. But it could also be three blocks. Let me think about typical archival transcription. The phrase \\\"gestrichen:\\\" means \\\"struck/deleted:\\\". It introduces the next line. So grouping makes sense.\\n\\nBut the prompt says \\\"Each block should be a separate string\\\". There are visually separated blocks by blank lines. Between \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" and \\\"gestrichen:\\\" there is a clear blank line. Between \\\"gestrichen:\\\" and \\\"Amendment 14\\\" there is no blank line (they are adjacent). So two blocks seems right.\\n\\nWait, let me look again. \\\"gestrichen:\\\" line, then \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\". These are consecutive lines with normal spacing. Yes, group them.\\n\\nActually, I want to reconsider whether to keep them separate. The example format just shows one entry. The safest is to capture text blocks as visually grouped. I'll go with two blocks. Hmm, but \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is short and underlined - it's a heading. The block structure:\\n\\nBlock A (top of body): \\n\\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n\\nBlock B:\\n\\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\n\\nBlock C:\\n\\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe spacing between B and C is similar to line spacing within A. So B and C form one logical block. I'll combine B and C.\\n\\nFinal decision: two information entries.\\n\\nWait, but actually it might be better to separate \\\"gestrichen:\\\" as its own because it's a distinct underlined heading. Let me reconsider the visual: \\n- \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\" (line 1)\\n- \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" (line 2)\\n- [blank]\\n- \\\"gestrichen:\\\" (underlined)\\n- \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe blank line separates the first group from the rest. The \\\"gestrichen:\\\" + amendment are together. I'll do two blocks.\\n\\nHmm, but consider that \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is an underlined word that labels the action, and the amendment line is the detail. They belong together. OK two blocks.\\n\\nCompany: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" \u2014 note it's a person's name (Carlos H\u00e4uselmann) but in these cards the \\\"company\\\" field is the primary name top-left. Exclude location \\\"CARACAS\\\". So company transcription: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\". Should I include the comma? The field says exclude the location. The comma separates name from location. I'll transcribe company as \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" (no trailing comma). \\n\\nLocation: \\\"CARACAS\\\".\\n\\nb_id: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" \u2014 should I include trailing period? The code starts with \\\"B.\\\" and the image shows \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" with a trailing period. I'll transcribe as shown: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Hmm, but typically the identifier is \\\"B.51.322.GB.384\\\". The trailing period might be part of the typed line. I'll keep it as seen but maybe without trailing period is cleaner. The instruction says \\\"identifier code, usually in the top-right, starting with B.\\\" I'll transcribe exactly: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Actually, including the final period is faithful. But many such extractions drop the trailing period. Let me keep it faithful to image: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Hmm. The trailing dot is likely just punctuation ending the line. I'll include it as transcribed since the task says meticulous archivist. Actually, I'll provide \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" \u2014 wait, let me reconsider. If it's an identifier, trailing period is not part of it. But the instruction is transcription. I'll keep the trailing period to be safe? It says \\\"starting with B.\\\" not ending. I think cleaner to include exactly what's there. I'll go with \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" including final period? Let me look: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Yes there's a period after 384 before the edge. I'll include it.\\n\\nHmm, decisions. I'll transcribe b_id as \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" with the trailing period since it's visible. Actually, I worry that the trailing period is a delimiter. Given \\\"GB.384.\\\" \u2014 the pattern is segments separated by dots, and a final dot. The code is \\\"B.51.322.GB.384\\\" and final period is sentence/line end. I'll use \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" to be faithful. Let me settle: include the trailing period. No \u2014 I'll drop it because identifiers don't end in period typically and the instruction emphasizes code starting with B. But faithful transcription... \\n\\nI'll go with exactly \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Actually the image clearly shows a period at the end (there's a dot after 384). Meticulous archivist = transcribe what's there. Keep trailing period.\\n\\nHold on, reconsider date. There is no stamped date. The typed \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" is part of information, not a stamp. The prompt: \\\"date\\\": Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string. There's no stamp, so \\\"\\\". Good.\\n\\nLet me finalize JSON.\\n\\ninformation entries:\\n1: \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n2: \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe schema allows information to be array of Entry. Good.\\n\\nNote the text \\\"(Venezuela)\\\" \u2014 in image it's \\\".(Venezuela)\\\" with no space. Transcribe faithfully: \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\". Good.\\n\\nAlso \\\"H\u00e4uselmann\\\" with \u00e4. Good.\\n\\nFinal output raw JSON only.\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"The user wants me to extract data from an index card image. Let me analyze it carefully.\\n\\nTop-left: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos, CARACAS\\\"\\n- Company: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" (exclude location)\\n- Location: \\\"CARACAS\\\"\\n\\nTop-right: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\"\\n\\nMain body:\\n\\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n\\n\\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\n\\n\\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nDate: There's a date in the body \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" but the instructions say \\\"Any stamped dates on the card\\\". I don't see a stamped date. The \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" is typed in the body, not stamped. So date should be empty string. Let me reconsider - the instruction says \\\"Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string.\\\" There's no stamped date visible. So date = \\\"\\\".\\n\\nInformation blocks: The main body text. Each block separate string. Let me think about how to split. \\n\\nBlock 1: \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\nBlock 2: \\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\nBlock 3: \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nOr maybe block 2 and 3 together? \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is a heading, then the amendment line. The instruction says \\\"A list of text blocks from the main body of the card. Each block should be a separate string in the list. Maintain line breaks with \\\\n.\\\"\\n\\nLooking at the layout, there seem to be distinct blocks:\\n1. \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n2. \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nHmm, but \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is underlined and on its own line, with the amendment below. They could be one block or separate. The spacing: there's a blank line between \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" and \\\"gestrichen:\\\". Then \\\"gestrichen:\\\" and \\\"Amendment 14...\\\" are close together. So maybe:\\n\\ninformation: [\\n  {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"},\\n  {\\\"transcription\\\": \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"}\\n]\\n\\nActually, looking more carefully, \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is underlined and appears to be a label for what follows. I'll group it with the line below. But it could also be three blocks. Let me think about typical archival transcription. The phrase \\\"gestrichen:\\\" means \\\"struck/deleted:\\\". It introduces the next line. So grouping makes sense.\\n\\nBut the prompt says \\\"Each block should be a separate string\\\". There are visually separated blocks by blank lines. Between \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" and \\\"gestrichen:\\\" there is a clear blank line. Between \\\"gestrichen:\\\" and \\\"Amendment 14\\\" there is no blank line (they are adjacent). So two blocks seems right.\\n\\nWait, let me look again. \\\"gestrichen:\\\" line, then \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\". These are consecutive lines with normal spacing. Yes, group them.\\n\\nActually, I want to reconsider whether to keep them separate. The example format just shows one entry. The safest is to capture text blocks as visually grouped. I'll go with two blocks. Hmm, but \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is short and underlined - it's a heading. The block structure:\\n\\nBlock A (top of body): \\n\\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n\\nBlock B:\\n\\\"gestrichen:\\\"\\n\\nBlock C:\\n\\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe spacing between B and C is similar to line spacing within A. So B and C form one logical block. I'll combine B and C.\\n\\nFinal decision: two information entries.\\n\\nWait, but actually it might be better to separate \\\"gestrichen:\\\" as its own because it's a distinct underlined heading. Let me reconsider the visual: \\n- \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\" (line 1)\\n- \\\"Amendment 9, 1940.\\\" (line 2)\\n- [blank]\\n- \\\"gestrichen:\\\" (underlined)\\n- \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe blank line separates the first group from the rest. The \\\"gestrichen:\\\" + amendment are together. I'll do two blocks.\\n\\nHmm, but consider that \\\"gestrichen:\\\" is an underlined word that labels the action, and the amendment line is the detail. They belong together. OK two blocks.\\n\\nCompany: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" \u2014 note it's a person's name (Carlos H\u00e4uselmann) but in these cards the \\\"company\\\" field is the primary name top-left. Exclude location \\\"CARACAS\\\". So company transcription: \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\". Should I include the comma? The field says exclude the location. The comma separates name from location. I'll transcribe company as \\\"H\u00e4uselmann Carlos\\\" (no trailing comma). \\n\\nLocation: \\\"CARACAS\\\".\\n\\nb_id: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" \u2014 should I include trailing period? The code starts with \\\"B.\\\" and the image shows \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" with a trailing period. I'll transcribe as shown: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Hmm, but typically the identifier is \\\"B.51.322.GB.384\\\". The trailing period might be part of the typed line. I'll keep it as seen but maybe without trailing period is cleaner. The instruction says \\\"identifier code, usually in the top-right, starting with B.\\\" I'll transcribe exactly: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Actually, including the final period is faithful. But many such extractions drop the trailing period. Let me keep it faithful to image: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Hmm. The trailing dot is likely just punctuation ending the line. I'll include it as transcribed since the task says meticulous archivist. Actually, I'll provide \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" \u2014 wait, let me reconsider. If it's an identifier, trailing period is not part of it. But the instruction is transcription. I'll keep the trailing period to be safe? It says \\\"starting with B.\\\" not ending. I think cleaner to include exactly what's there. I'll go with \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" including final period? Let me look: \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Yes there's a period after 384 before the edge. I'll include it.\\n\\nHmm, decisions. I'll transcribe b_id as \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" with the trailing period since it's visible. Actually, I worry that the trailing period is a delimiter. Given \\\"GB.384.\\\" \u2014 the pattern is segments separated by dots, and a final dot. The code is \\\"B.51.322.GB.384\\\" and final period is sentence/line end. I'll use \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" to be faithful. Let me settle: include the trailing period. No \u2014 I'll drop it because identifiers don't end in period typically and the instruction emphasizes code starting with B. But faithful transcription... \\n\\nI'll go with exactly \\\"B.51.322.GB.384.\\\" Actually the image clearly shows a period at the end (there's a dot after 384). Meticulous archivist = transcribe what's there. Keep trailing period.\\n\\nHold on, reconsider date. There is no stamped date. The typed \\\"23.Nov.1944\\\" is part of information, not a stamp. The prompt: \\\"date\\\": Any stamped dates on the card in YYYY-MM-DD format. If no date is present, use an empty string. There's no stamp, so \\\"\\\". Good.\\n\\nLet me finalize JSON.\\n\\ninformation entries:\\n1: \\\"Britische schwarze Liste\\\\nAmendment 9, 1940.\\\"\\n2: \\\"gestrichen:\\\\nAmendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\"\\n\\nThe schema allows information to be array of Entry. Good.\\n\\nNote the text \\\"(Venezuela)\\\" \u2014 in image it's \\\".(Venezuela)\\\" with no space. Transcribe faithfully: \\\"Amendment 14, vom 23.Nov.1944.(Venezuela)\\\". Good.\\n\\nAlso \\\"H\u00e4uselmann\\\" with \u00e4. Good.\\n\\nFinal output raw JSON only.\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1785007412,\"model\":\"moonshotai/kimi-k3\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":\"fpv0_0d4e787e\",\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":2021,\"prompt_tokens\":3725,\"total_tokens\":5746,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":1887,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":0,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.04149,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.04149,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.011175,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.030315}},\"provider\":\"Moonshot AI\"}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.9364858267835295, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 123496, "total_output_tokens": 44761, "total_tokens": 168257, "input_cost_usd": 0.3704879999999999, "output_cost_usd": 0.6714149999999999, "total_cost_usd": 1.0419029999999998}}, "normalized_score": 93.64858267835295}