{"_id": {"$oid": "6a8456c1ef0a19c343227d23"}, "test_id": "T1568", "benchmark": "general_meeting_minutes", "date": "2026-08-15", "tags": {"document-type": ["minutes"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["it", "fr", "de"], "layout": ["table"], "entry-type": ["person", "location"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["alexandra_binnenkade", "sven_lienhard", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "huggingface", "model": "thinkingmachines/Inkling:together", "dataclass": "MinutesPage", "temperature": 0.0, "role_description": "You are a historian with expertise in analyzing and summarizing historical meeting minutes", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "Please extract the metadata according to the given output format.\nName and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields.\nLose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\nBe aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \"visual splitting characters\" between name and address.\nFilename: {filename}\nPage: {page_number}", "results": {"text": "We need parse image table. Need extract entries 1-7 and totals at bottom. Need separate name and address, removing dashes that split them but preserve line breaks and internal dashes in address.\n\nLet's read table carefully.\n\nColumns: N\u00b0 D'ORDRE, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS (Ordinaire, de Priorit\u00e9, DE VOIX), NOMBRE DE VOIX? Actually columns: Ordinaire, de Priorit\u00e9? Wait \"ACTIONS\" with subcols \"Ordi- naires\" and \"de Prio- rit\u00e9\" and \"DE VOIX\". Then \"NOMBRE\" and \"SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\".\n\nData rows:\n1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8? Actually address line split: \"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\" maybe \"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\"? Need separate name and address. Name: \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\"?? Wait there is dash between name and address? The text in cell: \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\" Hmm need understand splitting characters. The instruction: \"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove 'visual splitting characters' between name and address.\"\n\nSo in row 1, the cell contains:\nMr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\n132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\n\nThus the dash after \"FEAU\" is the visual splitter between name and address? Actually name includes \"(Cabinet D. FEAU\" maybe that's part of name/organization? Let's parse: \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\" then dash then address \"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\". So name should be \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\" and address \"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\". Need remove the dash that splits them, but preserve line break. So name: \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU)\"? Wait there is opening parenthesis but no closing? In image maybe \"(Cabinet D. FEAU -\" then address. Actually might be \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU)\" as name, then address on next line. But we just need separate fields with line breaks preserved? The address field should contain the address lines with line breaks? The schema uses string, so we can include newline characters? Probably yes preserve linebreaks. Let's represent with \\n? But JSON can include actual newline escaped. We'll use \\n for clarity? Actually in JSON string we can embed \\n.\n\nLet's list all rows precisely.\n\nRow 1:\nNumber: 1\nActions Ordinaire: 179\nActions Priorit\u00e9: 520\nVoix: 699\nName/Address cell:\nLine1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\nLine2: 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\nSo name = \"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\"\nAddress = \"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\"\nBut need lose dashes between name and address. The dash after FEAU is removed. Also maybe there is a line break. So address starts on new line.\n\nRow 2:\nNumber: 2\nName/Address:\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\nWait need split name and address. The dash after BREHAM is splitter? Then \"La Tuilerie\" might be part of address? Actually \"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\" then address \"78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". Let's parse: Name \"Mr Marc BREHAM\", then splitter dash, then address \"La Tuilerie -\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\"? Or \"La Tuilerie\" is part of address? The instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address. Here there are dashes after BREHAM and after Tuilerie. Which one is the splitter? Typically format: Name - Address - maybe another line. Let's examine: \"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". This could be name \"Mr Marc BREHAM\", address \"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". But there is a dash between BREHAM and La Tuilerie (splitter), and another dash between Tuilerie and 78/St-Nom... which might be part of address? Actually address might be \"La Tuilerie\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\" with dash being line separator? But they said preserve linebreaks, lose dashes between name and address. The cell likely has line breaks:\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\nSo there is a line break after the second dash? In image, row 2 cell shows:\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\nThus the visual splitting dash is the first one after BREHAM? Or both? Let's think: They want separate name and address. The name is \"Mr Marc BREHAM\". The address is \"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". But there is also a dash after Tuilerie that might be a line separator replaced by dash in the table? Actually in other rows, they use \" - \" between name and address on same line, then address continues on next line without dash? Let's check row 3:\nCOMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\nHere there is no dash between name and address? Wait name is \"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\" then on next line \"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\". So no splitter dash, just line break.\n\nRow 4:\nSt\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\nSame.\n\nRow 5:\nSt\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\n\nRow 6:\nMr PANT Antonio\nSESSA (Tessin) Suisse\nHere name and address separated by line break, no dash.\n\nRow 7:\nMr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\nAvenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\nHere there is dash after Daniel, then \"Villa La Cava\" on same line, then next line address. So splitter is after Daniel. Address should be \"Villa La Cava\\nAvenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\". The dash between Daniel and Villa is removed. The dash in \"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\" is preserved.\n\nThus for row 2, likely name \"Mr Marc BREHAM\", address \"La Tuilerie\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". But there is a dash after Tuilerie in the cell: \"La Tuilerie -\". That might be a visual splitter for line break? Actually in the image, the cell might show:\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\nThe dash after Tuilerie could be at end of line indicating continuation? But they said preserve linebreaks, lose dashes between name and address. The dash after Tuilerie is within address? Let's examine consistency: In row 1, there is dash after FEAU then line break then address. In row 7, dash after Daniel then \"Villa La Cava\" then line break then address with dash. So the pattern is: Name - [part of address?] - then line break then rest of address. For row 7, \"Villa La Cava\" is part of address (the house/villa name), then line break, then street address. So the first dash separates name from address, and the second dash? Actually in row 7 there is only one dash: \"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\" then line break \"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\". So only one dash, between name and address start.\n\nThus for row 2, \"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\" then line break \"78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\". Here there are two dashes: one after BREHAM (name/address split), one after Tuilerie (maybe part of address? Or line separator?). But since \"La Tuilerie\" is likely part of address (like villa name), the dash after Tuilerie might be unnecessary visual split before line break? Actually they said \"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\" So we should remove the dash immediately following the name. Any other dashes within address should be preserved, but if there's a dash right before a line break that serves as visual splitting character? The instruction: \"only remove 'visual splitting characters' between name and address.\" So only the one separating name and address. Thus for row 2, remove dash after BREHAM. Keep \"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\"? But there is a line break after Tuilerie - maybe the", "model": "thinkingmachines/Inkling", "provider": "huggingface", "finish_reason": "length", "usage": {"input_tokens": 2650, "output_tokens": 2048, "total_tokens": 4698, "input_cost_usd": 0.00265, "output_cost_usd": 0.008294399999999999, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.010944399999999998}, "duration": 51.10115337371826, "timestamp": "2026-08-15T17:47:36.171957", "conversation_id": "94c3bd31-c5e5-4180-81e3-d68e0535b947", "score": {"fuzzy": 0.0}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"owKBJMX-6z2FuN-a2b9560ffaf5c990\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"length\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"We need parse image table. Need extract entries 1-7 and totals at bottom. Need separate name and address, removing dashes that split them but preserve line breaks and internal dashes in address.\\n\\nLet's read table carefully.\\n\\nColumns: N\u00b0 D'ORDRE, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS (Ordinaire, de Priorit\u00e9, DE VOIX), NOMBRE DE VOIX? Actually columns: Ordinaire, de Priorit\u00e9? Wait \\\"ACTIONS\\\" with subcols \\\"Ordi- naires\\\" and \\\"de Prio- rit\u00e9\\\" and \\\"DE VOIX\\\". Then \\\"NOMBRE\\\" and \\\"SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\\\".\\n\\nData rows:\\n1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8? Actually address line split: \\\"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" maybe \\\"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"? Need separate name and address. Name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\"?? Wait there is dash between name and address? The text in cell: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU - 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\" Hmm need understand splitting characters. The instruction: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove 'visual splitting characters' between name and address.\\\"\\n\\nSo in row 1, the cell contains:\\nMr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\n132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\n\\nThus the dash after \\\"FEAU\\\" is the visual splitter between name and address? Actually name includes \\\"(Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" maybe that's part of name/organization? Let's parse: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" then dash then address \\\"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". So name should be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\" and address \\\"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\". Need remove the dash that splits them, but preserve line break. So name: \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU)\\\"? Wait there is opening parenthesis but no closing? In image maybe \\\"(Cabinet D. FEAU -\\\" then address. Actually might be \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU)\\\" as name, then address on next line. But we just need separate fields with line breaks preserved? The address field should contain the address lines with line breaks? The schema uses string, so we can include newline characters? Probably yes preserve linebreaks. Let's represent with \\\\n? But JSON can include actual newline escaped. We'll use \\\\n for clarity? Actually in JSON string we can embed \\\\n.\\n\\nLet's list all rows precisely.\\n\\nRow 1:\\nNumber: 1\\nActions Ordinaire: 179\\nActions Priorit\u00e9: 520\\nVoix: 699\\nName/Address cell:\\nLine1: Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU -\\nLine2: 132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\nSo name = \\\"Mr Alain BREHAM (Cabinet D. FEAU\\\"\\nAddress = \\\"132 Boulevard Haussmann - 75 / PARIS 8\\\"\\nBut need lose dashes between name and address. The dash after FEAU is removed. Also maybe there is a line break. So address starts on new line.\\n\\nRow 2:\\nNumber: 2\\nName/Address:\\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\nWait need split name and address. The dash after BREHAM is splitter? Then \\\"La Tuilerie\\\" might be part of address? Actually \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\" then address \\\"78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". Let's parse: Name \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", then splitter dash, then address \\\"La Tuilerie -\\\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\"? Or \\\"La Tuilerie\\\" is part of address? The instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address. Here there are dashes after BREHAM and after Tuilerie. Which one is the splitter? Typically format: Name - Address - maybe another line. Let's examine: \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". This could be name \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". But there is a dash between BREHAM and La Tuilerie (splitter), and another dash between Tuilerie and 78/St-Nom... which might be part of address? Actually address might be \\\"La Tuilerie\\\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\" with dash being line separator? But they said preserve linebreaks, lose dashes between name and address. The cell likely has line breaks:\\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\nSo there is a line break after the second dash? In image, row 2 cell shows:\\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\nThus the visual splitting dash is the first one after BREHAM? Or both? Let's think: They want separate name and address. The name is \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\". The address is \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". But there is also a dash after Tuilerie that might be a line separator replaced by dash in the table? Actually in other rows, they use \\\" - \\\" between name and address on same line, then address continues on next line without dash? Let's check row 3:\\nCOMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\nHere there is no dash between name and address? Wait name is \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\" then on next line \\\"II bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\\". So no splitter dash, just line break.\\n\\nRow 4:\\nSt\u00e9 DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\nSame.\\n\\nRow 5:\\nSt\u00e9 de RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\nII bis rue Balzac - 75 / PARIS 8e\\n\\nRow 6:\\nMr PANT Antonio\\nSESSA (Tessin) Suisse\\nHere name and address separated by line break, no dash.\\n\\nRow 7:\\nMr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\nAvenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\nHere there is dash after Daniel, then \\\"Villa La Cava\\\" on same line, then next line address. So splitter is after Daniel. Address should be \\\"Villa La Cava\\\\nAvenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". The dash between Daniel and Villa is removed. The dash in \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\" is preserved.\\n\\nThus for row 2, likely name \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM\\\", address \\\"La Tuilerie\\\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". But there is a dash after Tuilerie in the cell: \\\"La Tuilerie -\\\". That might be a visual splitter for line break? Actually in the image, the cell might show:\\nMr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\n78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\nThe dash after Tuilerie could be at end of line indicating continuation? But they said preserve linebreaks, lose dashes between name and address. The dash after Tuilerie is within address? Let's examine consistency: In row 1, there is dash after FEAU then line break then address. In row 7, dash after Daniel then \\\"Villa La Cava\\\" then line break then address with dash. So the pattern is: Name - [part of address?] - then line break then rest of address. For row 7, \\\"Villa La Cava\\\" is part of address (the house/villa name), then line break, then street address. So the first dash separates name from address, and the second dash? Actually in row 7 there is only one dash: \\\"Mr MASSON Daniel - Villa La Cava\\\" then line break \\\"Avenue de la Cava - 06 / CANNES\\\". So only one dash, between name and address start.\\n\\nThus for row 2, \\\"Mr Marc BREHAM - La Tuilerie -\\\" then line break \\\"78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\". Here there are two dashes: one after BREHAM (name/address split), one after Tuilerie (maybe part of address? Or line separator?). But since \\\"La Tuilerie\\\" is likely part of address (like villa name), the dash after Tuilerie might be unnecessary visual split before line break? Actually they said \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" So we should remove the dash immediately following the name. Any other dashes within address should be preserved, but if there's a dash right before a line break that serves as visual splitting character? The instruction: \\\"only remove 'visual splitting characters' between name and address.\\\" So only the one separating name and address. Thus for row 2, remove dash after BREHAM. Keep \\\"La Tuilerie - 78/St-Nom la Bret\u00e8che\\\"? But there is a line break after Tuilerie - maybe the\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":[]},\"seed\":null}],\"created\":1786808829,\"model\":\"thinkingmachines/Inkling\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":\"default\",\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":2048,\"prompt_tokens\":2650,\"total_tokens\":4698,\"completion_tokens_details\":null,\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":null,\"cached_tokens\":0}},\"prompt\":[]}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.09287474552662595, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 23105, "total_output_tokens": 18377, "total_tokens": 41482, "input_cost_usd": 0.023105, "output_cost_usd": 0.07442684999999999, "total_cost_usd": 0.09753184999999999}}, "normalized_score": 9.287474552662594}