{"_id": {"$oid": "6aa46730b5f42b6d26dc8cda"}, "test_id": "T1733", "benchmark": "general_meeting_minutes", "date": "2026-09-08", "tags": {"document-type": ["minutes"], "writing": ["typed", "handwritten"], "century": [20], "language": ["it", "fr", "de"], "layout": ["table"], "entry-type": ["person", "location"], "task": ["information-extraction"]}, "contributors": ["alexandra_binnenkade", "sven_lienhard", "sorin_marti"], "hidden": false, "config": {"provider": "openrouter", "model": "qwen/qwen3.8-flash", "dataclass": "MinutesPage", "temperature": 0.0, "role_description": "You are a historian with expertise in analyzing and summarizing historical meeting minutes", "prompt_file": "prompt.txt", "legacy_test": false}, "prompt": "Please extract the metadata according to the given output format.\nName and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields.\nLose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\nBe aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \"visual splitting characters\" between name and address.\nFilename: {filename}\nPage: {page_number}", "results": {"text": "{\"document\":\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\",\"page_number\":9,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"1\",\"name\":\"Monsieur BREAM Alain\",\"address\":\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Monsieur BREAM Marc\",\"address\":\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"3\",\"name\":\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\nFRANCE\\nCANNES\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"4\",\"name\":\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\",\"address\":\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"168\",\"actions_p\":\"822\",\"no_de_voix\":\"990\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"5\",\"name\":\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\",\"address\":\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"45\",\"actions_p\":\"355\",\"no_de_voix\":\"400\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"6\",\"name\":\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\nCAISES\",\"address\":\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"7\",\"name\":\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin)\\nSUISSE\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"601\",\"total_p\":\"2017\",\"total_voix\":\"2818\"}}", "model": "qwen/qwen3.8-flash", "provider": "openrouter", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"input_tokens": 3159, "output_tokens": 9176, "total_tokens": 12335, "cached_tokens": 512, "input_cost_usd": 0.00047384999999999994, "output_cost_usd": 0.00431272, "estimated_cost_usd": 0.0047865699999999995}, "duration": 101.84822392463684, "timestamp": "2026-09-08T12:24:35.651627", "parsed": {"document": "Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9", "page_number": 9, "entries": [{"number": "1", "name": "Monsieur BREAM Alain", "address": "45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\nFRANCE", "actions_o": "179", "actions_p": "520", "no_de_voix": "699", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "2", "name": "Monsieur BREAM Marc", "address": "la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\nFRANCE", "actions_o": "179", "actions_p": "520", "no_de_voix": "699", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "3", "name": "Monsieur MASSON Daniel", "address": "Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\nFRANCE\nCANNES", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "4", "name": "COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI", "address": "2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\nFRANCE", "actions_o": "168", "actions_p": "822", "no_de_voix": "990", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "5", "name": "SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS", "address": "11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\nFRANCE", "actions_o": "45", "actions_p": "355", "no_de_voix": "400", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "6", "name": "SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\nCAISES", "address": "11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\nFRANCE", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}, {"number": "7", "name": "Monsieur PANI Antonio", "address": "SESSA (Tessin)\nSUISSE", "actions_o": "10", "actions_p": "", "no_de_voix": "10", "signature_present": false, "signature": ""}], "total_actions": {"total_o": "601", "total_p": "2017", "total_voix": "2818"}}, "conversation_id": "8c37b9a1-5369-4a2a-93a2-822746d0876e", "score": {"fuzzy": 0.9489330772139078}, "raw_response": "{\"id\":\"gen-1788862974-CNaDnf1csFk2OWH6ePA3\",\"choices\":[{\"finish_reason\":\"stop\",\"index\":0,\"logprobs\":null,\"message\":{\"content\":\"{\\n  \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\",\\n  \\\"page_number\\\": 9,\\n  \\\"entries\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"1\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Monsieur BREAM Alain\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"2\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Monsieur BREAM Marc\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"179\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"520\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"699\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"3\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"4\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"168\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"822\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"990\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"5\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"45\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"355\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"400\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"6\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\\nCAISES\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"number\\\": \\\"7\\\",\\n      \\\"name\\\": \\\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\\\",\\n      \\\"address\\\": \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\\nSUISSE\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_o\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"actions_p\\\": \\\"\\\",\\n      \\\"no_de_voix\\\": \\\"10\\\",\\n      \\\"signature_present\\\": false,\\n      \\\"signature\\\": \\\"\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"total_actions\\\": {\\n    \\\"total_o\\\": \\\"601\\\",\\n    \\\"total_p\\\": \\\"2017\\\",\\n    \\\"total_voix\\\": \\\"2818\\\"\\n  }\\n}\",\"refusal\":null,\"role\":\"assistant\",\"annotations\":null,\"audio\":null,\"function_call\":null,\"tool_calls\":null,\"parsed\":{\"document\":\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\",\"page_number\":9,\"entries\":[{\"number\":\"1\",\"name\":\"Monsieur BREAM Alain\",\"address\":\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Monsieur BREAM Marc\",\"address\":\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"179\",\"actions_p\":\"520\",\"no_de_voix\":\"699\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"3\",\"name\":\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\",\"address\":\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\nFRANCE\\nCANNES\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"4\",\"name\":\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\",\"address\":\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"168\",\"actions_p\":\"822\",\"no_de_voix\":\"990\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"5\",\"name\":\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\",\"address\":\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"45\",\"actions_p\":\"355\",\"no_de_voix\":\"400\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"6\",\"name\":\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\nCAISES\",\"address\":\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\nFRANCE\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"},{\"number\":\"7\",\"name\":\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\",\"address\":\"SESSA (Tessin)\\nSUISSE\",\"actions_o\":\"10\",\"actions_p\":\"\",\"no_de_voix\":\"10\",\"signature_present\":false,\"signature\":\"\"}],\"total_actions\":{\"total_o\":\"601\",\"total_p\":\"2017\",\"total_voix\":\"2818\"}},\"reasoning\":\"We need answer user's request: extract metadata according to JSON schema. Need produce final JSON only likely. Need analyze image. Need include entries 1-7, document, page_number. Need split Name and Address from same field. Lose dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address.\\n\\nNeed understand table. Columns: N\u00b0 D'ORDRE, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS O, ACTIONS P, NOMBRE DE VOIX, SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES.\\n\\nRows:\\n1: Monsieur BREAM Alain? Actually \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\". Address line: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" next line \\\"FRANCE\\\". Actions O 179, P 520, Voix 699.\\nNeed split name/address: name = Monsieur BREHAM Alain; address = 45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE. Preserve dashes in address. Remove visual splitting characters between name and address? The table has line break between name and address, maybe dash? In row 1, name line no dash after? Address starts next row. No dash between name and address. Good.\\n\\n2: Monsieur BREHAM Marc; address \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". O 179, P 520, Voix 699.\\n\\n3: Monsieur MASSON Daniel; address \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" next \\\"FRANCE       CANNES\\\". Hmm line has dash at end? \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line? Need preserve linebreaks. Address maybe \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? But visual: line 1: Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -; line 2: FRANCE      CANNES (CANNES far right). Could be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" or \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\"? Need preserve linebreaks. Since table cell has two lines: first address line with trailing dash, second line has FRANCE and CANNES separated by spaces. Should preserve linebreak between lines. For name/address split: name = Monsieur MASSON Daniel; address = Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES? But linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? They are same line separated by spaces, not linebreak. However table cell line: \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right on same row. Should we preserve as \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\" or maybe \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because address components? The instruction: preserve linebreaks. In image, no linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES, only horizontal spacing. So address = \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\". But maybe trailing dash between name and address? No.\\n\\n4: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI; address lines: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" next \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". O 168, P 822, Voix 990.\\n\\n5: SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS; address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". O 45, P 355, Voix 400.\\n\\n6: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-; address \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Here name contains hyphen at end due line wrap: \\\"FRAN-\\\" then address line starts \\\"CAISES\\\". Need remove visual splitting characters between name and address? The name is split across line with hyphen? Actually company name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" but table line break after FRAN- and next line CAISES is part of name? Wait column says Name and Address in same table field. Row 6: line1 \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" line2 \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" line3 \\\"FRANCE\\\". It seems \\\"FRAN-\\\" is end of line, \\\"CAISES\\\" begins address? But company name likely \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". The address is \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE\\\". However in table, \\\"CAISES\\\" appears on address line before address. Is it part of name continuation or address? Need infer. The name field may be split: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" and next line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". But \\\"CAISES\\\" is part of name, not address. The instruction says Name and Address are in same table field. Task extract separate. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\n\\nFor row 6, there is a hyphen at end of name line \\\"FRAN-\\\" and next line begins \\\"CAISES\\\". Is that a visual splitting character between name and address? It might be a line-wrap hyphen splitting the word FRANCAISES across lines. We need remove hyphen between name and address? But if \\\"CAISES\\\" is name continuation, not address. How to split? Need determine actual name/address.\\n\\nMaybe row 6 name: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-CAISES? Address: 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE. In the cell, line 1 is name, line 2 begins with CAISES then address. The hyphen at end of line 1 is a visual splitting character between name and address? Actually it's between name and address? The name line ends with FRAN- and address line begins CAISES. But CAISES belongs to name. If we remove dash between name and address and preserve linebreaks, we might output name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\" and address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\"? That would be wrong. Need handle hyphenated line break: remove hyphen and join? But instruction says lose any dashes between name and address, preserve linebreaks. Could mean if table uses a dash to separate name and address (e.g., name - address), remove that dash, not hyphens in addresses. For row 6, the dash at end of name line is likely a line break hyphen, not address separator. We should reconstruct name as \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" and address as \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But how to know? The line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" includes CAISES followed by address. Need split after CAISES. So name includes CAISES. Remove hyphen between FRAN and CAISES? Since visual splitting character? We can preserve linebreak? If name/address separate, name can be one line: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES. Address: 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE. That seems best.\\n\\nBut instruction: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\\" So if a dash separates name and address in the same line, remove it. For row 6, the hyphen at end of name line and continuation CAISES on next line: maybe remove hyphen and join name? It's not between name and address but between name parts. However we need separate name/address. We can output name with no hyphen? Need decide.\\n\\n7: Monsieur PANI Antonio; address \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" next \\\"SUISSE\\\". O 10, P blank, Voix 10.\\n\\nSignatures: all blank? signature_present false, signature empty string? Schema requires signature string. Could use \\\"\\\" for absent. Need entries with number string, name string, address string, actions_o string, actions_p string, no_de_voix string, signature_present bool, signature string.\\n\\nTotals: Need total actions O, P, Voix. Sum? Let's compute: O: 179+179+10+168+45+10+10 =? 179+179=358; +10=368; +168=536; +45=581; +10=591; +10=601. P: 520+520+0? blank for 3? +822+355+0? +0? = 520+520=1040; +822=1862; +355=2217. But row 3 P blank, row 6 P blank, row 7 P blank. Total P 2217. Voix: 699+699+10+990+400+10+10 = 699+699=1398; +10=1408; +990=2398; +400=2798; +10=2808; +10=2818. But note total O+P should equal Voix? 601+2217=2818 yes. So totals strings.\\n\\nNeed document: \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\". Page 9.\\n\\nNeed ensure JSON valid. Additional properties false. Need maybe include blank signature fields? Yes.\\n\\nNeed think about exact text, accents. Use French accents? Image has \\\"N\u00b0 D'ORDRE\\\", \\\"SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\\\". Names: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\" (BREAM? It says BREHAM). \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Marc\\\". \\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\". \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\". \\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\". \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" maybe. \\\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\\\".\\n\\nAddress details:\\n1: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Preserve dash. Maybe linebreak after address line. Need no dash between name and address? There is a dash after Charcot which is part of address. Good.\\n2: \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\\nFRANCE\\\".\\n3: \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\"? Could there be linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? In table cell, \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line but separated by spaces. Preserve linebreaks means only actual line breaks. So address line 1: \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" line 2: \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". However maybe address is \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? The dash at end of line 1 could be visual splitting character between name/address? No, it's within address. But if dash at end of line 1 before line break, maybe preserve? It might be part of address: \\\"av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". Could be a dash separating address line and country? The instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So preserve trailing dash. But if line break after dash, output includes dash before newline. Could be okay.\\n\\nBut maybe row 3 address should be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because CANNES is on same line as FRANCE but far right; table may have two columns? No, only one cell. In OCR, spaces not linebreak. Preserve linebreaks means if there is no linebreak, don't insert. So \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\".\\n\\n4: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\". There are spaces before FRANCE. Should we preserve linebreak and spaces? Probably trim? JSON string can include multiple spaces? Need maybe normalize? The instruction preserve linebreaks, not necessarily spaces. We can keep single spaces? In table: \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Could output \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\" with one space. That's okay. But preserve linebreaks only. Could include multiple spaces? Not necessary.\\n\\n5: \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\".\\n6: Need decide. If we output name: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" address: \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". This removes hyphen and linebreak between FRAN and CAISES? But instruction says preserve linebreaks. However linebreak was within name due cell wrap. Since name/address separate fields, we can join name parts. Is that violating? We need extract name and address separate. The name is split across lines with hyphen; to separate name/address, we must reconstruct. It says lose dashes between name and address, not between name parts. But if we remove hyphen between name parts, maybe okay? It says visual splitting characters between name and address. The hyphen at end of line might be visual splitting character between name and address? But CAISES is name, not address. Hmm.\\n\\nAlternative: name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\"? address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But that leaves CAISES in address, wrong. Also instruction says remove dashes between name and address: if name ends with dash and address begins CAISES, remove dash? name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\" address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Still wrong. But maybe the expected extraction from table treats first line as name, remaining as address, even if line wrap. Then row 6 address includes CAISES. But task says Name and Address are in same table field. Need extract them into separate fields. It might not require semantic correction, just split by first line? But examples? The column header says NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES. Usually first line name, subsequent lines address. For row 6, first line name (truncated), second line address? But \\\"CAISES\\\" is not address; it's continuation of name due line break. A historian would reconstruct. The instruction about dashes between name and address suggests there may be a dash separating name and address on same line? For row 6, the dash is at end of name line, maybe visual splitting character between name and address? But because line break, address starts CAISES? Hmm.\\n\\nLet's inspect row 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" then next line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". If the hyphen is a line-break hyphen, the full name is FRANCAISES. The address starts after CAISES. The visual splitting character between name and address is not dash but the word CAISES? We need separate. So output reconstructed.\\n\\nWhat about row 1: \\\"Monsieur BREAM Alain\\\" next line address. No dash between. Row 2 same. Row 3 same. Row 4 first line name, second line address. Row 5 first line name, second line address. Row 7 first line name, second line address.\\n\\nNeed maybe include signature blank. Could signature_present false and signature \\\"\\\" for all. But schema requires signature string. Yes.\\n\\nNeed ensure no extra text. Final JSON.\\n\\nDouble-check totals: Row 3 O=10, P blank, voix=10. Row 6 O=10, P blank, voix=10. Row 7 O=10, P blank, voix=10. P total 520+520+822+355=2217. O total 179+179+10+168+45+10+10=601. Voix total 699+699+10+990+400+10+10=2818. Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe actions_o for blank? For row 3 P blank: use \\\"\\\"? Schema type string, required. Could use empty string for blank. Or \\\"0\\\"? In table blank means 0? But total P doesn't include. For consistency maybe \\\"\\\" for blank. But if total O/P strings, maybe blank should be \\\"\\\" not \\\"0\\\". The schema doesn't specify. For actions_p row 3 blank, row 6 blank, row 7 blank. Could use \\\"\\\". But if total P is sum of numeric, blank as 0. Should we output \\\"0\\\"? Need think. The table has blank cells for P. In extraction, maybe preserve blank as empty string. But total actions require strings. For no_de_voix always numbers. For actions_o always numbers. For actions_p blank for some. Use \\\"\\\" to indicate blank. But maybe expected \\\"0\\\"? In previous tasks, likely empty if no value. But schema required string, can be empty. Need decide. If total O+P = total Voix, if P blank as \\\"\\\" still total 2217. If use \\\"0\\\", entries have 0. Which is more useful? The instruction: extract metadata. Blank cells maybe no value. I'd use \\\"\\\" for blank. But if JSON schema expects string, empty okay. Could also use \\\"0\\\" to represent no actions P. However table has 10 O and 10 Voix, P blank. Since O+P=Voix, P is effectively 0. But not written. Historian might record blank? Hmm.\\n\\nThe field actions_p: \\\"Actions P\\\". If blank, maybe empty string. But for totals, total_p numeric. I'd use \\\"\\\" for blank to preserve source. But some validators? required string, no minLength. okay.\\n\\nSignature: blank cells. Could signature_present false, signature \\\"\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed consider document name includes accent? \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\". Use exactly. Page number int 9.\\n\\nNeed maybe name/address linebreaks represented as \\\\n in JSON. Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 address line \\\"FRANCE       CANNES\\\" maybe should be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? Let's examine table: In row 3, cell has three lines? Row 3: line 1 \\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\". line 2 \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\". line 3 \\\"FRANCE\\\" (left) and \\\"CANNES\\\" (right). There is a horizontal line separating row 3 and row 4? Actually row 3 cell includes line 2 and line 3. The line 3 has FRANCE under left part and CANNES under right part. Could be two separate lines? The table row height may have two lines within cell: first line address, second line country and city. Since CANNES is on same baseline as FRANCE. So linebreak after address line, then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4 address line \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Could be \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\\\\nFRANCE\\\"? In image: line 1 \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" line 2 \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Same line. So no newline between. Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 1 address \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" and next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 2 address \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" and next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Name row 1: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\" maybe \\\"BREAM\\\"? Need zoom: It says B R E H A M? The image text: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\". Yes.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 5: \\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" maybe \\\"L'AURIERAS\\\". Yes.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" should we include hyphen in name? If reconstruct, no. But instruction says preserve dashes in addresses, not names? It says lose any dashes between name and address. If name has hyphen at end due line break, remove. But if company name officially includes hyphen? \\\"FRAN-CAISES\\\" line break, no. Use full \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". Could there be accent? \\\"FRAN\u00c7AISES\\\"? The image uppercase no cedilla? It says FRAN- then CAISES. Could be \\\"FRANCAISES\\\" without cedilla due typewriter. Use \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". But if preserving source, maybe \\\"FRAN-\\\"? Need decide. The task likely expects name/address split, not reconstruct? Let's think about expected data from similar extraction tasks. They want entries with name and address separate. \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\\"\\n\\nThis suggests in the table cell, name and address may be concatenated with a dash as separator, e.g., \\\"Name - Address\\\". Need remove that dash. Here row 1 address line includes \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" but that's address internal. Row 6 has \\\"FRAN-\\\" at end of name line and \\\"CAISES\\\" next line. Is the dash a visual splitting character between name and address? If they simply take first line as name and rest as address, row 6 name ends with dash. They might want remove dash between name and address: if name line ends with dash and next line address begins, remove dash. But then address begins \\\"CAISES 11 bis...\\\". That seems likely if automatic rule: split by line breaks, first line name, rest address, remove trailing dash from name if separator. But human historian should know CAISES part of name. The prompt says \\\"You are a historian with expertise...\\\" so likely semantic.\\n\\nCould there be a visual dash between name and address in row 6? The cell line 1: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" line 2: \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". If we treat line 2 as address, the dash at end of line 1 is a visual splitting character between name and address. Remove it: name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\", address \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But that is nonsensical. Maybe the intended extraction from this specific document might have known that the name is \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". The instruction about dashes between name/address is to avoid removing dashes in addresses like \\\"NEUILLY-S/SEINE\\\". It doesn't mention line-break hyphens. But we need handle.\\n\\nLet's consider if row 6 name in official shareholder list could be \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". Address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE\\\". Yes. So output that.\\n\\nWhat about row 3: Could address be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? The trailing dash after 06 may be a visual separator between address and country? The instruction says preserve dashes in addresses. But maybe it's a dash separating address line and country? It could be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\" with linebreak before CANNES? Actually line 2: \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right. It might be country and city on same line. The dash after 06 may be just line wrap? Maybe address is \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? Hmm. In French addresses, \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE CANNES\\\" weird. Maybe \\\"06\\\" is department number (Alpes-Maritimes), then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\" means country and city. The dash after 06 could separate address from country. But instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So keep.\\n\\nNeed maybe remove trailing spaces. JSON strings can have \\\\n. Use trimmed lines.\\n\\nLet's construct final JSON:\\n{\\n \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\",\\n \\\"page_number\\\": 9,\\n \\\"entries\\\": [\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"1\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"179\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"520\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"699\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"2\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur BREHAM Marc\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"179\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"520\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"699\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"3\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"4\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"168\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"822\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"990\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"5\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"45\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"355\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"400\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"6\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"7\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\\nSUISSE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"}\\n ],\\n \\\"total_actions\\\":{\\\"total_o\\\":\\\"601\\\",\\\"total_p\\\":\\\"2217\\\",\\\"total_voix\\\":\\\"2818\\\"}\\n}\\n\\nNeed ensure row 6 name maybe with hyphen? If we choose reconstructed, okay. But maybe expected to preserve linebreaks? We removed linebreak within name. But name/address separate fields, okay.\\n\\nCould row 6 name include \\\"FRAN-\\\"? The instruction says preserve linebreaks? It says lose dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. If name has linebreak, maybe preserve? But name field can contain linebreak? It says Name and Address in same table field, extract separate. Preserve linebreaks likely within address. For name, if line wrapped, maybe not preserve. But if we preserve linebreak in name: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\\nCAISES\\\"? That would be weird. But maybe they want preserve linebreaks in combined field? No, separate fields.\\n\\nCould address row 6 include \\\"CAISES\\\"? If they expect first line name, rest address, then address includes CAISES. But semantic extraction better.\\n\\nNeed maybe use \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-CAISES\\\"? No.\\n\\nLet's inspect line 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" then \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". The hyphen at end of line is a typographic line-break hyphen. In OCR, to reconstruct, remove hyphen and join. Yes.\\n\\nNeed maybe include accent on \\\"FRAN\u00c7AISES\\\"? The source uppercase likely no cedilla? It says FRAN- CAISES, no \u00c7. Use \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". If adding accent may be correction. But document uses uppercase French maybe \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". Keep source.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 5 \\\"SOCIETE\\\" no accent? Source \\\"SOCIETE\\\". Keep.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 4 \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 7 \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" maybe \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" and \\\"SUISSE\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe total actions includes A REPORTER row? At bottom \\\"A REPORTER\\\" no numbers. Ignore.\\n\\nNeed ensure JSON only, no markdown. final should be valid JSON.\\n\\nDouble-check schema: top-level properties document string, page_number integer, entries array of Entry, total_actions TotalActions. AdditionalProperties false. Entry required all. signature_present default false but required. Use false.\\n\\nPotential issue: \\\"actions_p\\\" empty string for blank. Could be considered invalid if expecting number? But type string. Good.\\n\\nAlternative: use \\\"0\\\" for blank P. Which is better for total? If entries have blank, total_p 2217. If use \\\"0\\\", total still 2217. But source blank. I think empty string preserves blank. However if downstream expects numeric string, empty may be less useful. But schema says string. The prompt: \\\"extract the metadata according to given output format.\\\" It doesn't say blank. In table, blank cells are empty. Use empty string.\\n\\nNeed maybe no_de_voix for row 3 is \\\"10\\\". Good.\\n\\nLet's consider if row 3 address should be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\". The instruction preserve linebreaks: In image, there is a linebreak after \\\"06 -\\\". Then \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" are on same line. But table cell may have two lines: line 1 address, line 2 country, line 3 city? Wait row 3 has 3 lines? Let's view: Row 3: number 3, name line. Then address line \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\". Next line \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right. The row height seems two lines after name? Actually there are horizontal lines: row 3 cell spans from line after number 3 to line before number 4. Within that, there are two text lines: line 1 Villa..., line 2 FRANCE CANNES. So yes.\\n\\nBut \\\"CANNES\\\" could be on a separate line visually? It is aligned right on same row, maybe table has two columns? No, no vertical line. It's same line. So \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\".\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 1 address line: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 2 address: \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" then \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\". There are spaces before FRANCE. Could preserve multiple spaces? Not necessary. But if strict, maybe output \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". JSON can include spaces. Should we preserve spaces? \\\"preserve linebreaks\\\" not spaces. Could normalize to single space. Fine.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 trailing dash before newline: \\\"06 -\\\". If we remove visual splitting characters between name and address, not relevant. But maybe the dash at end of line is a visual separator between address and country? It might be considered splitting character? It says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So keep.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 6: If we reconstruct name, we removed linebreak and hyphen. Could be considered not preserving linebreaks. But linebreak was within name due table, not between name/address. Hmm.\\n\\nCould output name with linebreak: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\\nCAISES\\\"? Then address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But then name includes CAISES on second line, address starts next. That preserves linebreaks in name field. But instruction says lose dashes between name and address, not within name. It doesn't say remove linebreaks within name. But separate fields: name can have linebreaks. However if name linebreak due cell wrap, maybe preserve? The prompt: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" This could mean when splitting, keep linebreaks that are within address (or name?) as they appear. If row 6 name spans two lines, preserve linebreak? But then name field would include linebreak and hyphen. But the hyphen at end of first name line is not between name and address? It's between name parts. Should preserve? Maybe yes. But the instruction specifically says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address. So do not remove hyphen in name? But if hyphen at end of line is a visual splitting character between name and address? It is at boundary if next line is address. But next line is not address. This is ambiguous.\\n\\nWhat would a human do? Extract metadata: name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". Because the hyphen is line-break. I think okay.\\n\\nNeed maybe include \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" as name and \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\" as address if following table layout. But that would be bad data. The prompt likely tests ability to separate name/address despite dashes. It may expect row 6 name includes \\\"FRAN-\\\"? Let's think of dataset. The document is a table of shareholders. The field \\\"NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE\\\" contains name and address in multiple lines. Usually first line is name, subsequent lines address. For row 6, first line is name but truncated; second line starts with continuation of name then address. The instruction says Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. This might be from a pipeline where they want to split by newline: first line name, rest address. But then row 6 fails. They added dash instruction for cases where name/address separated by dash on same line. But not line-wrap.\\n\\nMaybe the table field is actually one cell with lines:\\n- SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\n- CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\n- FRANCE\\nIf splitting first line as name, rest as address, address includes CAISES. But maybe \\\"CAISES\\\" is not part of name? Could the company name be \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" and address \\\"CAISES 11 bis...\\\"? No, CAISES not address. So human correction necessary.\\n\\nNeed maybe include name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\"? If they want preserve source exactly, but address wrong. The prompt says historian, so correct.\\n\\nLet's maybe output name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" and address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 name/address: Could \\\"CANNES\\\" be part of address line after FRANCE, maybe should be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because city often separate line. But source same line. Could preserve linebreak? There is no linebreak. But table cell may have \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line due formatting. If we output \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\", okay. If expected \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\", maybe fail? Need infer from instruction \\\"preserve linebreaks\\\". If there is a visual linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? In the image, they are on same horizontal line, but separated by large space. No. So not.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4: \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\" same line. Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe include \\\"A REPORTER\\\"? No, not an entry.\\n\\nLet's ensure final JSON no trailing commas. Use double quotes. Accents in document string and names? JSON supports UTF-8. Good.\\n\\nNow final.\",\"reasoning_details\":[{\"type\":\"reasoning.text\",\"text\":\"We need answer user's request: extract metadata according to JSON schema. Need produce final JSON only likely. Need analyze image. Need include entries 1-7, document, page_number. Need split Name and Address from same field. Lose dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address.\\n\\nNeed understand table. Columns: N\u00b0 D'ORDRE, NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES, ACTIONS O, ACTIONS P, NOMBRE DE VOIX, SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES.\\n\\nRows:\\n1: Monsieur BREAM Alain? Actually \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\". Address line: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" next line \\\"FRANCE\\\". Actions O 179, P 520, Voix 699.\\nNeed split name/address: name = Monsieur BREHAM Alain; address = 45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE. Preserve dashes in address. Remove visual splitting characters between name and address? The table has line break between name and address, maybe dash? In row 1, name line no dash after? Address starts next row. No dash between name and address. Good.\\n\\n2: Monsieur BREHAM Marc; address \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". O 179, P 520, Voix 699.\\n\\n3: Monsieur MASSON Daniel; address \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" next \\\"FRANCE       CANNES\\\". Hmm line has dash at end? \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line? Need preserve linebreaks. Address maybe \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? But visual: line 1: Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -; line 2: FRANCE      CANNES (CANNES far right). Could be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" or \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\"? Need preserve linebreaks. Since table cell has two lines: first address line with trailing dash, second line has FRANCE and CANNES separated by spaces. Should preserve linebreak between lines. For name/address split: name = Monsieur MASSON Daniel; address = Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES? But linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? They are same line separated by spaces, not linebreak. However table cell line: \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right on same row. Should we preserve as \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\" or maybe \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because address components? The instruction: preserve linebreaks. In image, no linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES, only horizontal spacing. So address = \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\". But maybe trailing dash between name and address? No.\\n\\n4: COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI; address lines: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" next \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". O 168, P 822, Voix 990.\\n\\n5: SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS; address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". O 45, P 355, Voix 400.\\n\\n6: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-; address \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Here name contains hyphen at end due line wrap: \\\"FRAN-\\\" then address line starts \\\"CAISES\\\". Need remove visual splitting characters between name and address? The name is split across line with hyphen? Actually company name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" but table line break after FRAN- and next line CAISES is part of name? Wait column says Name and Address in same table field. Row 6: line1 \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" line2 \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" line3 \\\"FRANCE\\\". It seems \\\"FRAN-\\\" is end of line, \\\"CAISES\\\" begins address? But company name likely \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". The address is \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE\\\". However in table, \\\"CAISES\\\" appears on address line before address. Is it part of name continuation or address? Need infer. The name field may be split: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" and next line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". But \\\"CAISES\\\" is part of name, not address. The instruction says Name and Address are in same table field. Task extract separate. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\n\\nFor row 6, there is a hyphen at end of name line \\\"FRAN-\\\" and next line begins \\\"CAISES\\\". Is that a visual splitting character between name and address? It might be a line-wrap hyphen splitting the word FRANCAISES across lines. We need remove hyphen between name and address? But if \\\"CAISES\\\" is name continuation, not address. How to split? Need determine actual name/address.\\n\\nMaybe row 6 name: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-CAISES? Address: 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE. In the cell, line 1 is name, line 2 begins with CAISES then address. The hyphen at end of line 1 is a visual splitting character between name and address? Actually it's between name and address? The name line ends with FRAN- and address line begins CAISES. But CAISES belongs to name. If we remove dash between name and address and preserve linebreaks, we might output name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\" and address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\"? That would be wrong. Need handle hyphenated line break: remove hyphen and join? But instruction says lose any dashes between name and address, preserve linebreaks. Could mean if table uses a dash to separate name and address (e.g., name - address), remove that dash, not hyphens in addresses. For row 6, the dash at end of name line is likely a line break hyphen, not address separator. We should reconstruct name as \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" and address as \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But how to know? The line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\" includes CAISES followed by address. Need split after CAISES. So name includes CAISES. Remove hyphen between FRAN and CAISES? Since visual splitting character? We can preserve linebreak? If name/address separate, name can be one line: SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES. Address: 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE. That seems best.\\n\\nBut instruction: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\\" So if a dash separates name and address in the same line, remove it. For row 6, the hyphen at end of name line and continuation CAISES on next line: maybe remove hyphen and join name? It's not between name and address but between name parts. However we need separate name/address. We can output name with no hyphen? Need decide.\\n\\n7: Monsieur PANI Antonio; address \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" next \\\"SUISSE\\\". O 10, P blank, Voix 10.\\n\\nSignatures: all blank? signature_present false, signature empty string? Schema requires signature string. Could use \\\"\\\" for absent. Need entries with number string, name string, address string, actions_o string, actions_p string, no_de_voix string, signature_present bool, signature string.\\n\\nTotals: Need total actions O, P, Voix. Sum? Let's compute: O: 179+179+10+168+45+10+10 =? 179+179=358; +10=368; +168=536; +45=581; +10=591; +10=601. P: 520+520+0? blank for 3? +822+355+0? +0? = 520+520=1040; +822=1862; +355=2217. But row 3 P blank, row 6 P blank, row 7 P blank. Total P 2217. Voix: 699+699+10+990+400+10+10 = 699+699=1398; +10=1408; +990=2398; +400=2798; +10=2808; +10=2818. But note total O+P should equal Voix? 601+2217=2818 yes. So totals strings.\\n\\nNeed document: \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\". Page 9.\\n\\nNeed ensure JSON valid. Additional properties false. Need maybe include blank signature fields? Yes.\\n\\nNeed think about exact text, accents. Use French accents? Image has \\\"N\u00b0 D'ORDRE\\\", \\\"SIGNATURE DES ACTIONNAIRES OU DES MANDATAIRES\\\". Names: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\" (BREAM? It says BREHAM). \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Marc\\\". \\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\". \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\". \\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\". \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" maybe. \\\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\\\".\\n\\nAddress details:\\n1: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Preserve dash. Maybe linebreak after address line. Need no dash between name and address? There is a dash after Charcot which is part of address. Good.\\n2: \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\\nFRANCE\\\".\\n3: \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\"? Could there be linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? In table cell, \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line but separated by spaces. Preserve linebreaks means only actual line breaks. So address line 1: \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" line 2: \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". However maybe address is \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? The dash at end of line 1 could be visual splitting character between name/address? No, it's within address. But if dash at end of line 1 before line break, maybe preserve? It might be part of address: \\\"av. de la Cava 06 -\\\" then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". Could be a dash separating address line and country? The instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So preserve trailing dash. But if line break after dash, output includes dash before newline. Could be okay.\\n\\nBut maybe row 3 address should be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because CANNES is on same line as FRANCE but far right; table may have two columns? No, only one cell. In OCR, spaces not linebreak. Preserve linebreaks means if there is no linebreak, don't insert. So \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\".\\n\\n4: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\". There are spaces before FRANCE. Should we preserve linebreak and spaces? Probably trim? JSON string can include multiple spaces? Need maybe normalize? The instruction preserve linebreaks, not necessarily spaces. We can keep single spaces? In table: \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Could output \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\" with one space. That's okay. But preserve linebreaks only. Could include multiple spaces? Not necessary.\\n\\n5: \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\".\\n6: Need decide. If we output name: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" address: \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". This removes hyphen and linebreak between FRAN and CAISES? But instruction says preserve linebreaks. However linebreak was within name due cell wrap. Since name/address separate fields, we can join name parts. Is that violating? We need extract name and address separate. The name is split across lines with hyphen; to separate name/address, we must reconstruct. It says lose dashes between name and address, not between name parts. But if we remove hyphen between name parts, maybe okay? It says visual splitting characters between name and address. The hyphen at end of line might be visual splitting character between name and address? But CAISES is name, not address. Hmm.\\n\\nAlternative: name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\"? address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But that leaves CAISES in address, wrong. Also instruction says remove dashes between name and address: if name ends with dash and address begins CAISES, remove dash? name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\" address = \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Still wrong. But maybe the expected extraction from table treats first line as name, remaining as address, even if line wrap. Then row 6 address includes CAISES. But task says Name and Address are in same table field. Need extract them into separate fields. It might not require semantic correction, just split by first line? But examples? The column header says NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE DES ACTIONNAIRES. Usually first line name, subsequent lines address. For row 6, first line name (truncated), second line address? But \\\"CAISES\\\" is not address; it's continuation of name due line break. A historian would reconstruct. The instruction about dashes between name and address suggests there may be a dash separating name and address on same line? For row 6, the dash is at end of name line, maybe visual splitting character between name and address? But because line break, address starts CAISES? Hmm.\\n\\nLet's inspect row 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" then next line \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". If the hyphen is a line-break hyphen, the full name is FRANCAISES. The address starts after CAISES. The visual splitting character between name and address is not dash but the word CAISES? We need separate. So output reconstructed.\\n\\nWhat about row 1: \\\"Monsieur BREAM Alain\\\" next line address. No dash between. Row 2 same. Row 3 same. Row 4 first line name, second line address. Row 5 first line name, second line address. Row 7 first line name, second line address.\\n\\nNeed maybe include signature blank. Could signature_present false and signature \\\"\\\" for all. But schema requires signature string. Yes.\\n\\nNeed ensure no extra text. Final JSON.\\n\\nDouble-check totals: Row 3 O=10, P blank, voix=10. Row 6 O=10, P blank, voix=10. Row 7 O=10, P blank, voix=10. P total 520+520+822+355=2217. O total 179+179+10+168+45+10+10=601. Voix total 699+699+10+990+400+10+10=2818. Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe actions_o for blank? For row 3 P blank: use \\\"\\\"? Schema type string, required. Could use empty string for blank. Or \\\"0\\\"? In table blank means 0? But total P doesn't include. For consistency maybe \\\"\\\" for blank. But if total O/P strings, maybe blank should be \\\"\\\" not \\\"0\\\". The schema doesn't specify. For actions_p row 3 blank, row 6 blank, row 7 blank. Could use \\\"\\\". But if total P is sum of numeric, blank as 0. Should we output \\\"0\\\"? Need think. The table has blank cells for P. In extraction, maybe preserve blank as empty string. But total actions require strings. For no_de_voix always numbers. For actions_o always numbers. For actions_p blank for some. Use \\\"\\\" to indicate blank. But maybe expected \\\"0\\\"? In previous tasks, likely empty if no value. But schema required string, can be empty. Need decide. If total O+P = total Voix, if P blank as \\\"\\\" still total 2217. If use \\\"0\\\", entries have 0. Which is more useful? The instruction: extract metadata. Blank cells maybe no value. I'd use \\\"\\\" for blank. But if JSON schema expects string, empty okay. Could also use \\\"0\\\" to represent no actions P. However table has 10 O and 10 Voix, P blank. Since O+P=Voix, P is effectively 0. But not written. Historian might record blank? Hmm.\\n\\nThe field actions_p: \\\"Actions P\\\". If blank, maybe empty string. But for totals, total_p numeric. I'd use \\\"\\\" for blank to preserve source. But some validators? required string, no minLength. okay.\\n\\nSignature: blank cells. Could signature_present false, signature \\\"\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed consider document name includes accent? \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\". Use exactly. Page number int 9.\\n\\nNeed maybe name/address linebreaks represented as \\\\n in JSON. Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 address line \\\"FRANCE       CANNES\\\" maybe should be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? Let's examine table: In row 3, cell has three lines? Row 3: line 1 \\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\". line 2 \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\". line 3 \\\"FRANCE\\\" (left) and \\\"CANNES\\\" (right). There is a horizontal line separating row 3 and row 4? Actually row 3 cell includes line 2 and line 3. The line 3 has FRANCE under left part and CANNES under right part. Could be two separate lines? The table row height may have two lines within cell: first line address, second line country and city. Since CANNES is on same baseline as FRANCE. So linebreak after address line, then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4 address line \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Could be \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL\\\\nFRANCE\\\"? In image: line 1 \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" line 2 \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". Same line. So no newline between. Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 1 address \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" and next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 2 address \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" and next \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Name row 1: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\" maybe \\\"BREAM\\\"? Need zoom: It says B R E H A M? The image text: \\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\". Yes.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 5: \\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\" maybe \\\"L'AURIERAS\\\". Yes.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" should we include hyphen in name? If reconstruct, no. But instruction says preserve dashes in addresses, not names? It says lose any dashes between name and address. If name has hyphen at end due line break, remove. But if company name officially includes hyphen? \\\"FRAN-CAISES\\\" line break, no. Use full \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". Could there be accent? \\\"FRAN\u00c7AISES\\\"? The image uppercase no cedilla? It says FRAN- then CAISES. Could be \\\"FRANCAISES\\\" without cedilla due typewriter. Use \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". But if preserving source, maybe \\\"FRAN-\\\"? Need decide. The task likely expects name/address split, not reconstruct? Let's think about expected data from similar extraction tasks. They want entries with name and address separate. \\\"Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. Be aware: Addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove \\\"visual splitting characters\\\" between name and address.\\\"\\n\\nThis suggests in the table cell, name and address may be concatenated with a dash as separator, e.g., \\\"Name - Address\\\". Need remove that dash. Here row 1 address line includes \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" but that's address internal. Row 6 has \\\"FRAN-\\\" at end of name line and \\\"CAISES\\\" next line. Is the dash a visual splitting character between name and address? If they simply take first line as name and rest as address, row 6 name ends with dash. They might want remove dash between name and address: if name line ends with dash and next line address begins, remove dash. But then address begins \\\"CAISES 11 bis...\\\". That seems likely if automatic rule: split by line breaks, first line name, rest address, remove trailing dash from name if separator. But human historian should know CAISES part of name. The prompt says \\\"You are a historian with expertise...\\\" so likely semantic.\\n\\nCould there be a visual dash between name and address in row 6? The cell line 1: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" line 2: \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". If we treat line 2 as address, the dash at end of line 1 is a visual splitting character between name and address. Remove it: name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN\\\", address \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But that is nonsensical. Maybe the intended extraction from this specific document might have known that the name is \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". The instruction about dashes between name/address is to avoid removing dashes in addresses like \\\"NEUILLY-S/SEINE\\\". It doesn't mention line-break hyphens. But we need handle.\\n\\nLet's consider if row 6 name in official shareholder list could be \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". Address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e FRANCE\\\". Yes. So output that.\\n\\nWhat about row 3: Could address be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? The trailing dash after 06 may be a visual separator between address and country? The instruction says preserve dashes in addresses. But maybe it's a dash separating address line and country? It could be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\" with linebreak before CANNES? Actually line 2: \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right. It might be country and city on same line. The dash after 06 may be just line wrap? Maybe address is \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\"? Hmm. In French addresses, \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 - FRANCE CANNES\\\" weird. Maybe \\\"06\\\" is department number (Alpes-Maritimes), then \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\" means country and city. The dash after 06 could separate address from country. But instruction says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So keep.\\n\\nNeed maybe remove trailing spaces. JSON strings can have \\\\n. Use trimmed lines.\\n\\nLet's construct final JSON:\\n{\\n \\\"document\\\": \\\"Se_18_Assembl\u00e9es_3_Bilanz1968_2_page_9\\\",\\n \\\"page_number\\\": 9,\\n \\\"entries\\\": [\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"1\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur BREHAM Alain\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"179\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"520\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"699\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"2\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur BREHAM Marc\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"179\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"520\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"699\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"3\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur MASSON Daniel\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE CANNES\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"4\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\\n93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"168\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"822\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"990\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"5\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"SOCIETE DES MINES DE L'AURIERAS\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"45\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"355\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"400\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"6\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"},\\n  {\\\"number\\\":\\\"7\\\",\\\"name\\\":\\\"Monsieur PANI Antonio\\\",\\\"address\\\":\\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\\nSUISSE\\\",\\\"actions_o\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"actions_p\\\":\\\"\\\",\\\"no_de_voix\\\":\\\"10\\\",\\\"signature_present\\\":false,\\\"signature\\\":\\\"\\\"}\\n ],\\n \\\"total_actions\\\":{\\\"total_o\\\":\\\"601\\\",\\\"total_p\\\":\\\"2217\\\",\\\"total_voix\\\":\\\"2818\\\"}\\n}\\n\\nNeed ensure row 6 name maybe with hyphen? If we choose reconstructed, okay. But maybe expected to preserve linebreaks? We removed linebreak within name. But name/address separate fields, okay.\\n\\nCould row 6 name include \\\"FRAN-\\\"? The instruction says preserve linebreaks? It says lose dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. If name has linebreak, maybe preserve? But name field can contain linebreak? It says Name and Address in same table field, extract separate. Preserve linebreaks likely within address. For name, if line wrapped, maybe not preserve. But if we preserve linebreak in name: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\\nCAISES\\\"? That would be weird. But maybe they want preserve linebreaks in combined field? No, separate fields.\\n\\nCould address row 6 include \\\"CAISES\\\"? If they expect first line name, rest address, then address includes CAISES. But semantic extraction better.\\n\\nNeed maybe use \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-CAISES\\\"? No.\\n\\nLet's inspect line 6: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" then \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\". The hyphen at end of line is a typographic line-break hyphen. In OCR, to reconstruct, remove hyphen and join. Yes.\\n\\nNeed maybe include accent on \\\"FRAN\u00c7AISES\\\"? The source uppercase likely no cedilla? It says FRAN- CAISES, no \u00c7. Use \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". If adding accent may be correction. But document uses uppercase French maybe \\\"FRANCAISES\\\". Keep source.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 5 \\\"SOCIETE\\\" no accent? Source \\\"SOCIETE\\\". Keep.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 4 \\\"COMPAGNIE CENTRALE SICLI\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe row 7 \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" maybe \\\"SESSA (Tessin)\\\" and \\\"SUISSE\\\". Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe total actions includes A REPORTER row? At bottom \\\"A REPORTER\\\" no numbers. Ignore.\\n\\nNeed ensure JSON only, no markdown. final should be valid JSON.\\n\\nDouble-check schema: top-level properties document string, page_number integer, entries array of Entry, total_actions TotalActions. AdditionalProperties false. Entry required all. signature_present default false but required. Use false.\\n\\nPotential issue: \\\"actions_p\\\" empty string for blank. Could be considered invalid if expecting number? But type string. Good.\\n\\nAlternative: use \\\"0\\\" for blank P. Which is better for total? If entries have blank, total_p 2217. If use \\\"0\\\", total still 2217. But source blank. I think empty string preserves blank. However if downstream expects numeric string, empty may be less useful. But schema says string. The prompt: \\\"extract the metadata according to given output format.\\\" It doesn't say blank. In table, blank cells are empty. Use empty string.\\n\\nNeed maybe no_de_voix for row 3 is \\\"10\\\". Good.\\n\\nLet's consider if row 3 address should be \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\\nFRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\". The instruction preserve linebreaks: In image, there is a linebreak after \\\"06 -\\\". Then \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" are on same line. But table cell may have two lines: line 1 address, line 2 country, line 3 city? Wait row 3 has 3 lines? Let's view: Row 3: number 3, name line. Then address line \\\"Villa la Cava, av. de la Cava 06 -\\\". Next line \\\"FRANCE\\\" left, \\\"CANNES\\\" right. The row height seems two lines after name? Actually there are horizontal lines: row 3 cell spans from line after number 3 to line before number 4. Within that, there are two text lines: line 1 Villa..., line 2 FRANCE CANNES. So yes.\\n\\nBut \\\"CANNES\\\" could be on a separate line visually? It is aligned right on same row, maybe table has two columns? No, no vertical line. It's same line. So \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\".\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 1 address line: \\\"45 bd Charcot - NEUILLY-S/SEINE (92)\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 2 address: \\\"la Tuilerie - ST NOM LA BRETECHE\\\" then \\\"FRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4: \\\"2/4 rue Blaise Pascal\\\" then \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\". There are spaces before FRANCE. Could preserve multiple spaces? Not necessary. But if strict, maybe output \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL       FRANCE\\\". JSON can include spaces. Should we preserve spaces? \\\"preserve linebreaks\\\" not spaces. Could normalize to single space. Fine.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 trailing dash before newline: \\\"06 -\\\". If we remove visual splitting characters between name and address, not relevant. But maybe the dash at end of line is a visual separator between address and country? It might be considered splitting character? It says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them. So keep.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 6: If we reconstruct name, we removed linebreak and hyphen. Could be considered not preserving linebreaks. But linebreak was within name due table, not between name/address. Hmm.\\n\\nCould output name with linebreak: \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\\nCAISES\\\"? Then address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". But then name includes CAISES on second line, address starts next. That preserves linebreaks in name field. But instruction says lose dashes between name and address, not within name. It doesn't say remove linebreaks within name. But separate fields: name can have linebreaks. However if name linebreak due cell wrap, maybe preserve? The prompt: \\\"Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks.\\\" This could mean when splitting, keep linebreaks that are within address (or name?) as they appear. If row 6 name spans two lines, preserve linebreak? But then name field would include linebreak and hyphen. But the hyphen at end of first name line is not between name and address? It's between name parts. Should preserve? Maybe yes. But the instruction specifically says addresses may contain multiple dashes; preserve them, only remove visual splitting characters between name and address. So do not remove hyphen in name? But if hyphen at end of line is a visual splitting character between name and address? It is at boundary if next line is address. But next line is not address. This is ambiguous.\\n\\nWhat would a human do? Extract metadata: name = \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\". Because the hyphen is line-break. I think okay.\\n\\nNeed maybe include \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" as name and \\\"CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\" as address if following table layout. But that would be bad data. The prompt likely tests ability to separate name/address despite dashes. It may expect row 6 name includes \\\"FRAN-\\\"? Let's think of dataset. The document is a table of shareholders. The field \\\"NOM, PR\u00c9NOMS ET DOMICILE\\\" contains name and address in multiple lines. Usually first line is name, subsequent lines address. For row 6, first line is name but truncated; second line starts with continuation of name then address. The instruction says Name and Address are in the same table field. Your task is to extract them into separate fields. Lose any dashes between name and address but preserve linebreaks. This might be from a pipeline where they want to split by newline: first line name, rest address. But then row 6 fails. They added dash instruction for cases where name/address separated by dash on same line. But not line-wrap.\\n\\nMaybe the table field is actually one cell with lines:\\n- SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\n- CAISES 11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\n- FRANCE\\nIf splitting first line as name, rest as address, address includes CAISES. But maybe \\\"CAISES\\\" is not part of name? Could the company name be \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\" and address \\\"CAISES 11 bis...\\\"? No, CAISES not address. So human correction necessary.\\n\\nNeed maybe include name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRAN-\\\"? If they want preserve source exactly, but address wrong. The prompt says historian, so correct.\\n\\nLet's maybe output name \\\"SOCIETE DE RECHERCHES MINIERES FRANCAISES\\\" and address \\\"11 bis rue Balzac PARIS 8e\\\\nFRANCE\\\". Good.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 3 name/address: Could \\\"CANNES\\\" be part of address line after FRANCE, maybe should be \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\" because city often separate line. But source same line. Could preserve linebreak? There is no linebreak. But table cell may have \\\"FRANCE\\\" and \\\"CANNES\\\" on same line due formatting. If we output \\\"FRANCE CANNES\\\", okay. If expected \\\"FRANCE\\\\nCANNES\\\", maybe fail? Need infer from instruction \\\"preserve linebreaks\\\". If there is a visual linebreak between FRANCE and CANNES? In the image, they are on same horizontal line, but separated by large space. No. So not.\\n\\nPotential issue: Row 4: \\\"93 - LE BLANC-MESNIL FRANCE\\\" same line. Good.\\n\\nNeed maybe include \\\"A REPORTER\\\"? No, not an entry.\\n\\nLet's ensure final JSON no trailing commas. Use double quotes. Accents in document string and names? JSON supports UTF-8. Good.\\n\\nNow final.\",\"format\":\"unknown\",\"index\":0}]},\"native_finish_reason\":\"stop\"}],\"created\":1788862974,\"model\":\"qwen/qwen3.8-flash\",\"object\":\"chat.completion\",\"service_tier\":null,\"system_fingerprint\":null,\"usage\":{\"completion_tokens\":9176,\"prompt_tokens\":3159,\"total_tokens\":12335,\"completion_tokens_details\":{\"accepted_prediction_tokens\":null,\"audio_tokens\":0,\"reasoning_tokens\":8372,\"rejected_prediction_tokens\":null,\"image_tokens\":0},\"prompt_tokens_details\":{\"audio_tokens\":0,\"cached_tokens\":512,\"cache_write_tokens\":0,\"video_tokens\":0},\"cost\":0.004717962,\"is_byok\":false,\"cost_details\":{\"upstream_inference_cost\":0.004717962,\"upstream_inference_prompt_cost\":0.000405242,\"upstream_inference_completions_cost\":0.00431272}},\"provider\":\"Alibaba\"}"}, "scoring": {"fuzzy": 0.8497827219493904, "cost_summary": {"total_input_tokens": 28387, "total_output_tokens": 124998, "total_tokens": 153385, "input_cost_usd": 0.0037871999999999997, "output_cost_usd": 0.05588958000000001, "total_cost_usd": 0.06300711}}, "pricing": {"bucket_date": "2026-09-08", "age_days": 0, "input_price_per_million": 0.15, "output_price_per_million": 0.47}, "timing": {"total_response_s": 1472.41, "mean_response_s": 163.6, "slowest_response_s": 318.04, "inputs_timed": 9, "inputs_stored": 9, "span_s": 216.42}, "normalized_score": 84.97827219493904}